본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중재인의 공정성과 독립성에 관한 연구

A Study on the Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

An arbitrator's duty shall be independence and impartiality such as a judge who has procedurally absolute position. Independence is the freedom from others, impartiality is the status of having no-partial condition. Although these show relevance between independence and impartiality, in actuality, it is not easy to prove them. Therefore, arbitrator has to prove his or her position by opening the public of reality and by having an obligation of notification. Each country which applies Arbitration rules or Arbitration act stays the same as Korean Commercial Arbitration Board does. Hence, each country has the moral principles in order to establish a standard of judgement for essential factors and requests preferentially the impartiality and the publicity. In reality, court of justice in England excludes arbitrator who has the close relation to a person concerned. Justice in France cancelled an authorization of arbitrator because of having the economic interest to the person concerned. And also, In United States, Federal Court reverses an arbitration judgment without giving any partiality to a person concerned because of not opening a public about the relationship between arbitrator and a person concerned. Therefore, decision basis of the independence and the impartiality is standardized by the economic interest of a person concerned, professional relation, society connection, relationship between arbitrator and arbitration representative in the same case while in process of arbitration, arbitrator's nationality If arbitrator does not keep the independence and the impartiality by a position of judge, he or she has to make responsible. this duty is divided by two things: civil case and crime case. and if arbitrator does break this responsibility, he or she will get the cancellation of judge and compensation of damage. However, Korea is placed in the real circumstance without judge precedent and moral principles including the independence and impartiality. In order to getting the good reputation of international arbitration institution, this country will have to enact principles of the independence and impartiality for arbitrator.

Abstract

An arbitrator's duty shall be independence and impartiality such as a judge who has procedurally absolute position. Independence is the freedom from others, impartiality is the status of having no-partial condition. Although these show relevance between independence and impartiality, in actuality, it is not easy to prove them. Therefore, arbitrator has to prove his or her position by opening the public of reality and by having an obligation of notification. Each country which applies Arbitration rules or Arbitration act stays the same as Korean Commercial Arbitration Board does. Hence, each country has the moral principles in order to establish a standard of judgement for essential factors and requests preferentially the impartiality and the publicity. In reality, court of justice in England excludes arbitrator who has the close relation to a person concerned. Justice in France cancelled an authorization of arbitrator because of having the economic interest to the person concerned. And also, In United States, Federal Court reverses an arbitration judgment without giving any partiality to a person concerned because of not opening a public about the relationship between arbitrator and a person concerned. Therefore, decision basis of the independence and the impartiality is standardized by the economic interest of a person concerned, professional relation, society connection, relationship between arbitrator and arbitration representative in the same case while in process of arbitration, arbitrator's nationality If arbitrator does not keep the independence and the impartiality by a position of judge, he or she has to make responsible. this duty is divided by two things: civil case and crime case. and if arbitrator does break this responsibility, he or she will get the cancellation of judge and compensation of damage. However, Korea is placed in the real circumstance without judge precedent and moral principles including the independence and impartiality. In order to getting the good reputation of international arbitration institution, this country will have to enact principles of the independence and impartiality for arbitrator.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 김경배, "국제무역분쟁과 ADR" (2005), 무역경영사
  2. 목영준, "상사중재법론", pp.134~ (2000), 박영사
  3. 목영준, "중재인의 권한,책임 및 면책", 중재논총 (2002), 대한상사중재원
  4. 백윤재, "대한상사중재원 중재규칙상 중재인의 선정과 권한에 관한 소고", 중재, (318) (2005), 대한상사중재원
  5. 윤병철, "국제중재에서 중재인의 선임", 중재, (319) (2006), 대한상사중재원
  6. 임양운, "중재인의 형사적 책임", 중재논총, 91(03) (1991), 대한상사중재원
  7. 장복희, "중재인의 윤리", 중재, (306) (2002), 대한상사중재원
  8. 조무제, "판례에서 보는 중재법", 중재, (319) (2006), 대한상사중재원
  9. Alan Redfern, "Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" (1991), Sweet & Maxwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)