중재인 선정과 법원의 역할에 관한 연구
Appointment of Arbitrators and the Role of the Court
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The expanded role of courts in arbitral procedures is said to have certain detrimental effects on the cost-effective approach to arbitration. This is the case when the court is appointing an arbitrator, pursuant to the specific domestic legal regime. The danger of decisions, especially those with expanded role of courts can create delays and hurdles. Even with contradictory viewpoints, the role of the court should complement the arbitral tribunal and not impede the functioning of arbitration independent of the judicial system. In this paper, two recent cases in Korean Supreme Court are reviewed, trying to find the proper implications on further arbitration practices especially in the stage of arbitrator appointment. Even though the proper appointment of arbitrators is essential to the existence of valid arbitration proceedings, appointment of arbitrators by the courts should constitute an administrative power, and not a judicial power. The cases reviewed make clear that the court must play a facilitative role in international commercial arbitration by assisting the parties in appointing the arbitral tribunal, the court intervention must be kept to a minimum.
Abstract
The expanded role of courts in arbitral procedures is said to have certain detrimental effects on the cost-effective approach to arbitration. This is the case when the court is appointing an arbitrator, pursuant to the specific domestic legal regime. The danger of decisions, especially those with expanded role of courts can create delays and hurdles. Even with contradictory viewpoints, the role of the court should complement the arbitral tribunal and not impede the functioning of arbitration independent of the judicial system. In this paper, two recent cases in Korean Supreme Court are reviewed, trying to find the proper implications on further arbitration practices especially in the stage of arbitrator appointment. Even though the proper appointment of arbitrators is essential to the existence of valid arbitration proceedings, appointment of arbitrators by the courts should constitute an administrative power, and not a judicial power. The cases reviewed make clear that the court must play a facilitative role in international commercial arbitration by assisting the parties in appointing the arbitral tribunal, the court intervention must be kept to a minimum.
참고문헌 (19)
- 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2000), 박영사
- 양병회, "주석 중재법" (2005), 대한상사중재원
- 장문철, "현대 중재법의 이해" (2000), 세창출판사
- "대법원 2009년 4월 15일 선고, 2007그154 결정", ~ (2009)
- "대법원 2009년 10월 14일 선고, 2009마1395 결정", ~ (2009)
- 강수미, "다수당사자중재에 있어서 중재인 선정방법", 중재연구, 18(2), pp.79~102 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 김용일, "국제상사중재에서 중재인 선정에 관한 비교연구", 통상정보연구, 8(3), pp.215~235 (2006), 한국통상정보학회
- 오원석, "ICC仲裁에서 仲裁人 選定과 確認에관한 硏究", 중재연구, 17(2), pp.23~41 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 오창석, "상사중재에 있어서의 중재인에 대한 시피사유와 중재인의 고지의무", 상사판례연구, 19(1), pp.353~388 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 이주원, "남북상사중재에 있어 중재인선정방식에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 18(1), pp.147~165 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 조정곤, "상사중재에서의 중재인선정과 전략게임", 중재학회지, 3(1) (1993), 한국중재학회
- 최혁준, "중재판정부 구성에 관한 비교연구-외국중재규칙을 중심으로 -", 중재연구, 16(1), pp.187~217 (2006), 한국중재학회
- Iguchi, Naoki, "ADR Client Strategies in Asia Leading Lawyers on Navigating the Negotiation Process, Advising Multinational Clients, and Understanding the Key Laws Governing ADR in this Region", Arbitration Laws and Trends in Japan (2009)
- Okekeifere, Andrew I., "Appointment and Challenge of Arbitrators under the UNICITRAL Model Law : Part 1: Agenda for Improvement", International Arbitration Law Review, 2(5) (1999)
- Sen, Aniruddha, "The Role of the Court in the Appointment of Arbitrators - an Analysis with Reference to the Supreme Court of India's Decision in S.B.P. v. Patel Engineering", Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law & Arbitration, 10 (2006)
- Stone, Katherine V.W., "Arbitration Law" (2003), Foundation Press New York
- United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, "UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 With amendments as adopted in 2006, United Nations, Vienna", ~ (2006)
- 近藤昌昭, "仲裁法 コンメンタール", ~ (2004)
- 小島武司, "注釋と論点 仲裁法" (2007), 靑林書院