국제 지식재산권 분쟁해결을 위한 중재의 활성화 방안 - 국내 ADR 기관의 발전방안을 중심으로-
Promoting an Arbitration System for International Dispute Resolution in Intellectual Property Rights Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As intellectual property rights are perceived as the key element of creating added values and securing competitiveness, the result of intellectual property rights disputes play an important role in the success of companies. As seen from above strong points of an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) system in Chapter III, intellectual property rights disputes increasingly tend to be resolved by ADR rather than litigation. Discussions about and operation of ADR are already being actively carried out in many countries, and major ADR institutions have been acquiring experience in a variety of intellectual property rights disputes. To enhance the use and recognition of ADR as the way of resolving the Intellectual Property Rights disputes in Korea, this study suggested the following three ways. First, domestic ADR institutions, the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) will need to establish cooperative systems with prominent overseas institutions to lead the disputing parties to fair resolutions as well as to instill trust in international arbitration institutions. Second, they will need to contribute to the promotion of arbitration systems throughout society by developing and applying a variety of arbitration systems as well as securing a pool of professionals. Finally, the arbitration rules will need to be continuously improved to deal with disputes promptly and reinforce privacy protection.
Abstract
As intellectual property rights are perceived as the key element of creating added values and securing competitiveness, the result of intellectual property rights disputes play an important role in the success of companies. As seen from above strong points of an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) system in Chapter III, intellectual property rights disputes increasingly tend to be resolved by ADR rather than litigation. Discussions about and operation of ADR are already being actively carried out in many countries, and major ADR institutions have been acquiring experience in a variety of intellectual property rights disputes. To enhance the use and recognition of ADR as the way of resolving the Intellectual Property Rights disputes in Korea, this study suggested the following three ways. First, domestic ADR institutions, the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) will need to establish cooperative systems with prominent overseas institutions to lead the disputing parties to fair resolutions as well as to instill trust in international arbitration institutions. Second, they will need to contribute to the promotion of arbitration systems throughout society by developing and applying a variety of arbitration systems as well as securing a pool of professionals. Finally, the arbitration rules will need to be continuously improved to deal with disputes promptly and reinforce privacy protection.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강수미, "지적재산권분쟁에 있어서 중재의 대상적격", 민사소송, 14(1), pp.127~155 (2010), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김용길, "知識財産權紛爭의 裁判外 解決制度에 관한 硏究 - 調停과 仲裁를 中心으로 -", 중재연구, 19(1), pp.67~98 (2009), 한국중재학회
- 김상찬, "지적재산권 분쟁의 ADR에 의한 해결", 법학연구, (47), pp.95~121 (2012), 한국법학회
- 김연호, "대한상사중재원의 국제중재 현황과 발전방향", 중재, (317) (2005), 대한상사중재원
- 김태훈, "대한상사중재원(KCAB) 중재규칙의 최근 개정내용에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 22(1), pp.3~22 (2012), 한국중재학회
- 대한상사중재원, "상사분쟁과 중재절차 해설", ~ (2004)
- 박범철, "신속절차에 관한 아시아 4개국의 국제중재규칙 비교 연구 - CIETAC, HKIAC, SIAC, KCAB를 중심으로 -", 중재연구, 23(1), pp.177~200 (2013), 한국중재학회
- 박영길, "동북아 지적재산권분쟁해결을 위한 ADR센터 필요성에 관하여", 지식재산연구, 4(33) (2009), 한국지식재산연구원
- 박종삼, "전자상거래 시장에서 지적재산권 분쟁에 대한 ADR 제도의 운용방안에 관한 연구", 유통경영학회지, 15(4), pp.79~91 (2012), 한국유통경영학회
- 손경한, "국제지적재산분쟁의 중재", 중재연구, 17(2), pp.71~100 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 오석웅, "지적재산권분쟁과 중재제도", 스포츠와 법, 14(2), pp.203~224 (2011), 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회
- 우광명, "지적재산권분쟁에 대한 ADR의 적응성", 무역학회지, 33(2), pp.265~290 (2008), 한국무역학회
- 윤선희, "일본에서의 지적재산 관련 조정·중재제도", 법조, 53(6), pp.187~209 (2004), 법조협회
- 윤선희, "ADR에서의 지적재산권분쟁", 중재연구, 13(1), pp.125~167 (2003), 한국중재학회
- 이상정, "ADR을 통한 지적재산권분쟁 해결의 현황과 개선책", 비교사법, 13(1), pp.161~182 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
- 이재곤, "지적재산권의 국제적 규제체제", 법학연구, 18(1), pp.293~319 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이헌희, "한중일 3국의 중재제도의 조화를 위한 소고 - 특허권 중재를 중심으로 -", 중재연구, 23(1), pp.153~175 (2013), 한국중재학회
- 장성원, "ADR을 통한 지적재산권 국제분쟁해결에 관한 연구 : 국제중재를 중심으로", 석사, 테크노경영, pp.2006
- 정효진, "높아진 지식재산권 장벽", 동아일보 2009.10.8자, ~ (2009)
- 채명석, "막대한 특허분쟁 소송비 내느니 차라리 美 시장 포기", 아시아경제 2008.2.20자, ~ (2008)
- 최송자, "지적재산권분쟁의 중재적격에 관한 연구-한국과 중국을 중심으로-", 중재연구, 21(2), pp.27~46 (2011), 한국중재학회
- 하홍준, "지적재산권 중재제도 도입 및 실시방안에 관한 연구", 특허청, ~ (2009)
- 한국지식재산연구원, "ADR(대안적 분쟁해결), 글로벌 지식재산분쟁 해결을 위한 현명한 선택", IP Policy 지식재산정책, 13 (2013)
- 함영주, "분쟁해결방법론" (2010), 진원사
- "American Arbitration Association, Annual Report", ~ (2004)
- Danny Ciraco, "Forget the Mechanics and Bring in the Gardeners", University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal, 47 (2000)
- Obert, "Intellectual Property Roundtable: A Discussion of IP and ADR", Dispute Resolution Journal of the American Arbitration Association, 60(1) (2005)
- Paradise, Gregg A., "Arbitration of Patent Infringement Disputes: Encouraging the Use of Arbitration Though Evidence Rules Reform", Fordham L. Rev, 64, pp.247~ (1995)
- School of International Arbitration, "International Arbitration Survey: Choices in International Arbitration" (2010), Queen Mary, University of London