AAA와 KCAB 조정제도의 비교와 시사점
Comparison and Suggestions of Mediation System between AAA and KCAB
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Mediation, which is part of ADR, is a method used to settle disputes amicably by employing a third party who is in a neutral position. Utilization and attention on meditation are increasing in place of litigation and arbitration owing to its effectiveness in terms of time, cost, and effectiveness in achieving an amicable settlement. As to Korea, mediation at the civil level was employed by the KCAB in July 2012 but its utilization was in ABC stage compared to mediation at the governmental and judicial levels. Based on this situation, this study reviewed the guideline and system of the KCAB through a comparison of the management system between the KCAB and AAA where mediation was in good use. This study further suggests solutions as to the development of an international commercial mediation system First, the KCAB rule is needed to create a mediation language, mediation place, mediator internationalization, and so on. Second, a system backup is necessary to ensure the enforceability and effectiveness of mediation. Third, a unified mediation law in Korea is desirable for the harmonization of mediations at civil, governmental, and judicial levels. The unified mediation law, if it is made, may lead to an international base where this requirement exists. Fourth, advertising the merits of mediation to the public is necessary. Fifth, securing specialized mediators and relevant training are essential. If the above requirements are implemented, Korea would advance in international commercial disputes.
Abstract
Mediation, which is part of ADR, is a method used to settle disputes amicably by employing a third party who is in a neutral position. Utilization and attention on meditation are increasing in place of litigation and arbitration owing to its effectiveness in terms of time, cost, and effectiveness in achieving an amicable settlement. As to Korea, mediation at the civil level was employed by the KCAB in July 2012 but its utilization was in ABC stage compared to mediation at the governmental and judicial levels. Based on this situation, this study reviewed the guideline and system of the KCAB through a comparison of the management system between the KCAB and AAA where mediation was in good use. This study further suggests solutions as to the development of an international commercial mediation system First, the KCAB rule is needed to create a mediation language, mediation place, mediator internationalization, and so on. Second, a system backup is necessary to ensure the enforceability and effectiveness of mediation. Third, a unified mediation law in Korea is desirable for the harmonization of mediations at civil, governmental, and judicial levels. The unified mediation law, if it is made, may lead to an international base where this requirement exists. Fourth, advertising the merits of mediation to the public is necessary. Fifth, securing specialized mediators and relevant training are essential. If the above requirements are implemented, Korea would advance in international commercial disputes.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김경배, "조정합의 성립의 결정요인에 관한 실증적 연구", 박사, 무역학, pp.2001
- 김광수, "UNCITRAL 모델 국제상사조정법 제정에 관한 입법동향", 계간중재, (303) (2002), 대한상사중재원
- 김광수, "UNCITRAL 모델 국제상사조정법에 관한 연구", 계간중재, (308) (2003), 대한상사중재원
- 행정형 ADR의 효력에 관한 국내외 제도분석, "김민중", 법원행정처, ~ (2010)
- 김상찬, "온라인 ADR을 통한 전자상거래 분쟁해결제도에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 20(1), pp.67~85 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 김연, "법원이 관여하지 않는 특별 조정절차의 검토", 민사소송, 14(1), pp.33~84 (2010), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김지호, "대한상사중재원의 조정규칙 시행에 즈음하여", 계간중재, (337) (2012), 대한상사중재원
- UNCITRAL 국제상사조정모델법의 개요 : 국제규범의 현황과 전망, "김태병", 법원행정처, ~ (2005)
- 박노형, "조정의 선진화 및 활성화 소고", 계간중재, (329) (2009), 대한상사중재원
- 신군재, "무역분쟁해결을 위한 한？중？CPR 조정규칙비교에 관한 연구", 관세학회지, 6(2), pp.307~326 (2005), 한국관세학회
- 신군재, "협상, 조정 및 중재의 유용성 비교", 계간중재, (봄) (2004), 대한상사중재원
- 이강빈, "국제상사조정 및 중재제도 개선에 관한 UNCITRAL 논의동향", 중재연구, 10 (2000), 한국중재학회
- 이강빈, "상사분쟁 조정제도에 관한 국제적 논의", 문화산업연구, (창간) (2001), 한국문화산업학회
- 이로리, "‘Mediation’과 ‘Conciliation’의 개념에 관한 비교법적 연구", 중재연구, 19(2), pp.27~47 (2009), 한국중재학회
- 오원석, "국제분쟁해결센터(ICDR)의 ‘긴급구제’제도(‘emergency relief’ system)에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 21(1), pp.239~258 (2011), 한국중재학회
- 유병현, "ADR의 발전과 법원외 조정의 효력", 법조, 53(6), pp.27~72 (2004), 법조협회
- 윤선희, "지적재산권분쟁과 ADR : 仲裁ㆍ調停을 중심으로", 지식재산 21, (80) (2003), 특허청
- 전병서, "조정절차에 대한 국제적 동향", 변호사, 35 (2005), 서울지방변호사회
- 정선주, "조정제도 활성화를 위한 조정절차의 개선방안-전자거래분쟁조정 절차를 중심으로", 서강법학, 7 (2005), 서강대학교 법학연구소
- 정선주, "법과전문대학원체제에서 ADR의 활성화를 위한 제언", 중재, (325) (2008)
- 최승환, "국제경제 분쟁해결제도로서의 조정", 경희법학, 31 (1996)
- 최옥환, "민간형 조정의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구 : 민사조정을 중심으로", 박사, 민사법, pp.2010
- 최장호, "우리나라 알선ㆍ조정상의 문제점과 그 개선방향", 무역학회지, 27(4) (2002), 한국무역학회
- 함영주, "우리나라 민간분쟁해결기관 구축시의 유의점– 미국 민간분쟁해결기관의 운영경험을 기초로 –", 민사소송, 15(2), pp.9~53 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회
- AAA, "Handbook on Mediation", JurisNet, LLC, ~ (2010)
- Alfini, James J, "Mediation Theory and Practice" (2006), LexisNexis
- Anonymous, "ICDR Named Largest International Commercial Arbitration Institution", Dispute Resolution Journal, 57(3) (2002)
- Born, Gary, "International Arbitration : Case and Materials" (2011), Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
- Born, Gary, "International Commercial Arbitration" (2009), Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
- Coffman, Jennifer, "The American Arbitration Association's Commitment to Diversity", Dispute Resolution Journal, 7(1) (2008)
- Kovach, Kimberlee K., "Mediation : Principles And Practice" (2004), West, a Thomson Business
- NCCUSL, "Uniform Mediation Act - 2001", Pepperdine Dispute Resolution law Journal, 3(3) (2003)
- Pappas, Brian A, "Med-Arb : The Best of both Worlds May to be Too good to be True (A Response to Wiseman)", Dispute Resolution Magazine, Spring, ~ (2013)
- Private Justice, "How civil litigation is becoming a private institution : The rise of private dispute centers", Southwestern University Law Review, 621 (1994)
- Tweeddale, Andrew, "Arbitration of Commercial Disputes : International and English Law and Practice" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Wendy Trachte-Huber, E., "Mediation And Negotiation Reaching Agreement in Law and Business" (2007), LexisNexis