Arbitrability of Patent Disputes in Korea: Focusing on Comparisons with U.S. legislation and case
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
General lawsuits can be chosen as a method of resolving patent disputes. However, a significant amount of time and money is wasted on litigation until the dispute is resolved. The Intellectual Property Framework Act in Korea requires the government to simplify litigation procedures and improve litigation systems to resolve intellectual property disputes quickly and fairly. As a result, accurate and timely resolution of patent disputes is given importance by the Korean government. Interest in arbitration as an alternative method of dispute resolution is growing. Although dispute resolution through arbitration is effective, the issue of resolving patent disputes through arbitration can lead to the arbitrability of patent disputes. It is therefore necessary to examine arbitrability of patent contracts and validity disputes. Korea has made efforts to reflect the model arbitration law of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law for quick judicial resolution of patent disputes. Korea has also strengthened related systems for alternative resolutions. However, improving the arbitration system will necessitate a thorough examination of the systems and practices of the United States which is the country in the forefront of intellectual property. This paper examines the arbitrability of Korea's patent dispute and makes recommendations for more efficient dispute resolution system changes.
Abstract
General lawsuits can be chosen as a method of resolving patent disputes. However, a significant amount of time and money is wasted on litigation until the dispute is resolved. The Intellectual Property Framework Act in Korea requires the government to simplify litigation procedures and improve litigation systems to resolve intellectual property disputes quickly and fairly. As a result, accurate and timely resolution of patent disputes is given importance by the Korean government. Interest in arbitration as an alternative method of dispute resolution is growing. Although dispute resolution through arbitration is effective, the issue of resolving patent disputes through arbitration can lead to the arbitrability of patent disputes. It is therefore necessary to examine arbitrability of patent contracts and validity disputes. Korea has made efforts to reflect the model arbitration law of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law for quick judicial resolution of patent disputes. Korea has also strengthened related systems for alternative resolutions. However, improving the arbitration system will necessitate a thorough examination of the systems and practices of the United States which is the country in the forefront of intellectual property. This paper examines the arbitrability of Korea's patent dispute and makes recommendations for more efficient dispute resolution system changes.
참고문헌 (17)
- 안원모, "무효사유가 존재하는 특허권의 행사와 권리남용의 항변", 산업재산권, (27), pp.209~260 (2008), 한국지식재산학회
- "The Basics of US Patent Litigation" (2002)[URL]
- Cook, Trevor, "International Intellectual Property Arbitration" (2010), Kluwer Law International
- Emini, Alessandra, "Patent Arbitration: The Underutilized Process for Resolving International Patent Disputes in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries", Arb. L. Rev, 9 (2017)
- Hashiguchi, Mizuki, "Unraveling the Conundrums of Running Royalties in Cross-Border Patent License Agreements", les Nouvelles - Journal of the Licensing Executives Society, LII(1) (2017)
- Korean Supreme Court Denies Refundment of Paid Royalties for Invalidated Patent, "Kang, Ilseok", FirstLaw IP, ~, pp.FirstLaw IP News. Issue No. 2014-04 (2014)
- Kang, Kijoong, "National Patent Litigation — South Korea", les Nouvelles - Journal of the Licensing Executives Society, LIII(4) (2018)
- 강수미, "지적재산권분쟁에 있어서 중재의 대상적격", 민사소송, 14(1), pp.127~155 (2010), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김갑유, "The Procedural Benefits of Arbitrating Patent Disputes", 중재연구, 26(3), pp.51~66 (2016), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- Merges, Robert P., "Transnational Intellectual Property Law, Text and Cases" (2018), Edward Elgar Publishing
- Miller, Charles E., "New Procedural Rights for IP Owners and the Promotion of Judicial Economy and Efficiency through the use of Arbitration in Civil Actions against the USPTO", NYIPLA BULLETIN (2007)
- Royalties Accrued prior to Patent Invalidation Held Recoverable, "Park, Hyoun Ja", FirstLaw IP, ~, pp.FirstLaw IP News. Issue No. 2019-02 (2019)
- Smith, M.A., "Arbitration of Patent Infringement and Validity Issues Worldwide", HARV. J.L. & TECH, 19 (2006)
- 석광현, "중재법의 개정방향- 국제상사중재의 측면을 중심으로 -", 서울대학교 법학, 53(3), pp.533~588 (2012), 법학연구소
- Yang, Hui Jin, "The Legal 500" (2020)
- 윤선희, "ADR에서의 지적재산권분쟁", 중재연구, 13(1), pp.125~167 (2003), 한국중재학회
- 윤선희, "특허권 중재가능성에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 22(1), pp.111~130 (2012), 한국중재학회[DOI]