Avoiding Hybrid Clauses Pitfalls: An Applied Framework
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper sets out a multi-dimensional approach that parties drafting a “hybrid clause” for their arbitration agreement can adopt, for purposes of maximizing enforceability, taking into account the multi-jurisdictional interplay between the seat Court, the governing law and the enforcement Court(s), as well as mandatory rules that can be present in the lex arbitrii, the governing law, and/or the law of the enforcement for a. This paper draws on both the co-authors’ practice experience, as well as first principles of party autonomy in light of mandatory rules, based predominantly on the scholarship of Briggs and Nygh.
Abstract
This paper sets out a multi-dimensional approach that parties drafting a “hybrid clause” for their arbitration agreement can adopt, for purposes of maximizing enforceability, taking into account the multi-jurisdictional interplay between the seat Court, the governing law and the enforcement Court(s), as well as mandatory rules that can be present in the lex arbitrii, the governing law, and/or the law of the enforcement for a. This paper draws on both the co-authors’ practice experience, as well as first principles of party autonomy in light of mandatory rules, based predominantly on the scholarship of Briggs and Nygh.
참고문헌 (28)
- Gary B. Born, "International Commercial Arbitration (Second Edition)" (2014), Kluwer Law International
- Adrian Briggs, "Agreements on Jurisdiction and Choice of Law" (2008), OUP
- Adeline Chong, "The Public Policy and Mandatory Rules of Third Countries in International Contracts", Journal of Private International Law, 2(1), pp.27~ (2006)
- Paul D. Friedland, "Arbitration Clauses for International Contracts" (2007), JurisNet
- "China – Yisheng V Invista" (2014)[URL]
- Jonathan Harris, "Contractual Freedom in the Conflict of Laws", Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20(2), pp.247~ (2000)
- Michael Hwang SC, "Selected Essays on International Arbitration", pp.551~563 (2013), Academy Publishing
- Christopher Lau, "Party Autonomy – A Turning Point?", Disp. Resol. Int'l, 4, pp.121~ (2010)
- "Swedish Court of Appeal upholds pathological hybrid arbitration clause" (2015)[URL]
- "HKL v Rizq International: Pathological Arbitration Clause Case Update" (2013)[URL]
- Peter Edward Nygh, "Autonomy in International Contracts" (1999), OUP
- Alan Redfern, "Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (Fifth Edition)" (2009), OUP
- Horatia Muir Watt, "“Party Autonomy” in International Contracts: From the Makings of a Myth to the Requirements of Global Governance", European Review of Contract Law, 6(3), pp.250~279 (2010)
- "Hybrid ICC/SIAC arbitration clause upheld in Singapore" (2009)[URL]
- "FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd and others", SGHCR, 12~ (2014)
- "HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd", SGHCR, 5~ (2013)
- "Insigma Technology Co Ltd v Alstom Technology Ltd", SGCA, 24~ (2009)
- "Sulamerica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors", EWCA Civ, 638~ (2012)
- "中华人民共和国浙江省宁波市中级人民法院民事裁定书", 浙甬仲确字第4号, ~ (2012)
- "中华人民共和国浙江省杭州市中级人民法院民事裁定书", 浙杭仲确字第7号, ~ (2011)
- "最高人民法院关于沧州东鸿包装材料有限公司诉法国DMT公司买卖合同纠纷一案仲裁条款效力的请示的复函", 民四他字第6号, ~ (2006)
- "Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China", Article 16 and 18, ~ (1994)
- Arbitration Law of People’s Republic of China, , Adopted at the Ninth Standing Committee Session of the Eighth National People's Congress (1994)
- "China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission CIETAC Arbitration Rules", ~ (2012)
- "China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Arbitration Rules", ~ (2004)
- "Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", ~ (1958)
- "International Chamber of Commerce, Rules of the Court of Arbitration", ~ (1975)
- (2006)[URL]