Third Party Funding in International Arbitration and its most current Development in Asia-Issue of Security for Costs and its main Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Third-party funding in international and domestic disputes is a fast-growing trend and it is increasingly used by large, solvent companies that simply wish to share risk in their finance. On January 10, 2017, the Civil Law Amendment Bill was passed in Singapore and on June 2017 an “Arbitration and Mediation Legislation (Third Party Funding) Bill” in Hong-Kong had a third-party funding to finance the international arbitration and other dispute resolutions expressly approved. This arbitral tribunal’s expanding discretion over critical interim measure of security cost was in issue. In Essar v. Norscot (2016), the arbitrator found that the additional third-party funding costs were recoverable as “other costs of the parties.” In here, the decision showed the issue of a tribunal’s power over cost measures could spread out to be reviewed and broadened through the legislative process. A recent investor-state arbitration case of ICSID, RSM Production Corporation v. Saint Lucia, covered the express awarding of security for costs where a claimant was funded by a third-party funder. It seems inevitable that the volume of third-party funding industry will grow more as time goes on. The next step would be to formulate guidelines on how to determine criteria against which an application for security for costs is measured.
Abstract
Third-party funding in international and domestic disputes is a fast-growing trend and it is increasingly used by large, solvent companies that simply wish to share risk in their finance. On January 10, 2017, the Civil Law Amendment Bill was passed in Singapore and on June 2017 an “Arbitration and Mediation Legislation (Third Party Funding) Bill” in Hong-Kong had a third-party funding to finance the international arbitration and other dispute resolutions expressly approved. This arbitral tribunal’s expanding discretion over critical interim measure of security cost was in issue. In Essar v. Norscot (2016), the arbitrator found that the additional third-party funding costs were recoverable as “other costs of the parties.” In here, the decision showed the issue of a tribunal’s power over cost measures could spread out to be reviewed and broadened through the legislative process. A recent investor-state arbitration case of ICSID, RSM Production Corporation v. Saint Lucia, covered the express awarding of security for costs where a claimant was funded by a third-party funder. It seems inevitable that the volume of third-party funding industry will grow more as time goes on. The next step would be to formulate guidelines on how to determine criteria against which an application for security for costs is measured.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김대중, "Third Party Funding in Investor State Arbitration", 동아법학, (62), pp.461~498 (2014), 법학연구소
- 김세진, "국제 중재의 제 3자 펀딩 입법의 의의 및 시사점: 싱가포르, 홍콩 입법 중심으로", 석사, pp.2018
- SGCA 57 판결의 분석 -, "중재연구", 2018, 131~152, pp.한국중재학회, http:
- 안건형, "국제투자중재에서 제3자 자금조달 제도의 주요 법적 쟁점", 중재연구, 23(2), pp.55~79 (2013), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 안건형, "클레임을 대상으로 하는 제3자 자금조달 제도 -경영학분야와 법학분야의 新융합파생상품을 중심으로-", 무역학회지, 38(1), pp.233~255 (2013), 한국무역학회
- 최혁준, "중재판정부 구성에 관한 비교연구-외국중재규칙을 중심으로 -", 중재연구, 16(1), pp.187~217 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 한나희, "중재가능성에 대한 미국연방법원의 해석", 중재연구, 28(4), pp.111~129 (2018), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- "Emmanuel Chua and Herbert Smith Freehills"[URL]
- A. Trusz, Jennifer, "Third Party funding in International Arbitration andConflict of Interests: The case for amending arbitration rules to require disclosure", Alternatives to High Cost Litigation, 32, pp.101~ (2014)
- Bonnel, M, "Australia-Case Note on Third Party Funding", Global Arbitration Review, 3(1) (2008)
- "Third-party funding in international arbitration lessons from litigation?" (2014)[URL]
- Gary B Born, "International Commercial Arbitration", pp.2495~ (2014), Kluwer Law International
- Gayner, Oliver, "Singapore and Hong Kong International Arbitration Meets Third Party Funding", Fordham International Law Journal, 40(3) (2017)
- "ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force on Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration" (2018)[URL]
- Jonas Von Goeler, "Third Party Funding in International Arbitration and its Impact on Procedure", pp.353~ (2016), Wolters Kluwer
- Kelsie Massini, "Risk Versus Reward: The Increasing Use of Third-party Funders in International Arbitration and The Awarding of security for costs", Arbitration Law Review, 7 (2015)
- Lisa Bench Nieuwveld, "Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration" (2017), Wolters Kluwer
- Maria Choi, "Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: A Case for Protecting Communication made in order to finance Arbitration", Georgetown Journal Legal ethics, 29 (2016)
- "Landmark decision awards security for costs against third-party funder in excess of funder's Commitment" (2017)[URL]
- "The Law Society of Singapore Guidance Note 10.1.1 Third-Party Funding" (2017)[URL]
- "Third-party funding: Snapshots from around the globe" (2012)[URL]
- William KIRTLEY, "Should An Arbitral Tribunal Order Security for Costs When an Impecunious Claimant Is Relyin upon Third-Party Funding?", Journal of International Arbitration, 30(1) (2013)
- "Essar Oilfields Service Ltd. v. Norscot Rig Mangement Pvt Limited, Case No. CL-201600188", ~ (2016)
- "RSM production Corporation v. Saint Lucia (ICSID Case No. ARB", 12, ~
- "Re Vanguard Energy Pte Ltd 「2015」 SGHC 156", ~