Revising the Korean Arbitration Act From a Civil Law Jurisdiction Perspective: The Example of the French Arbitration Reform
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In France, arbitration, both domestic and international, has recently been subjected to a major reform. This article discusses the content of the 2011 reform and its aftermath, while putting into perspective the current arbitration act in South Korea, an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction that contemplates reforming its own law. The two legal systems are characterized by their concern for efficiency and rationalization of the arbitration proceedings, through the codification of essential principles previously established by case law and through the promotion of the independence of this ADR vis-à-vis state courts. The efficiency consideration is strengthened at every stage of the proceedings: from the arbitration agreement often considered valid and rarely challenged, through the proceedings for annulment, recognition and enforcement of the award, up to the judicial assistance of the French supporting judge towards the actual arbitral proceedings.
Abstract
In France, arbitration, both domestic and international, has recently been subjected to a major reform. This article discusses the content of the 2011 reform and its aftermath, while putting into perspective the current arbitration act in South Korea, an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction that contemplates reforming its own law. The two legal systems are characterized by their concern for efficiency and rationalization of the arbitration proceedings, through the codification of essential principles previously established by case law and through the promotion of the independence of this ADR vis-à-vis state courts. The efficiency consideration is strengthened at every stage of the proceedings: from the arbitration agreement often considered valid and rarely challenged, through the proceedings for annulment, recognition and enforcement of the award, up to the judicial assistance of the French supporting judge towards the actual arbitral proceedings.
참고문헌 (31)
- S. Bollée, "Le droit français de l’arbitrage international après le décret n° 2011-48 du 13 janvier 2011", Revue critique de droit international privé, pp.553~ (2011)
- Y. Broussolle, "Réforme de l’arbitrage : le décret du 13 janvier 2011", Petites Affiches, (68), pp.15~ (2011)
- Th. Clay, "Simplification de la transaction et de l’arbitrage", JCP éd. G, (6), pp.800~ (2014)
- J. El Ahdab, "The 2011 French Arbitration act : Smooth move towards more efficiency, autonomy & attractiveness", The Institute for Transnational arbitration, 25(2), pp.5~ (2011)
- Ph. Fouchard, "Vers une réforme du droit français de l'arbitrage? - Quelques questions et suggestions", Rev. arb, (Issue 2,), pp.199~208 (1992)
- E. Gaillard, "La jurisprudence de la Cour de cassation en matière d’arbitrage international", Rev. arb, (4), pp.700~ (2007)
- E. Gaillard, "L’ordre juridique arbitral : réalité, utilité et spécificité", à paraitre dans la Revue de droit de Mcgill, 55
- E. Gaillard, "comm. after Cass. Civ. 1re, 21 mai 1997, Jaguar, Rev. arb", 537~ (1997)
- E. Gaillard, "Paris renforce son droit de l’arbitrage", La Tribune, 27~ (2011)
- F. Hastings, "Nouvelles améliorations pour l’arbitrage des litiges de l’entreprise", La Tribune, 22~ (2011)
- M. Henry, "Les obligations d'indépendance et d'information de l'arbitre à la lumière de la jurisprudence récente", Rev. arb, (Issue), pp.193~224 (1999)
- B. Hughes, "Towards a uniform approach to confidentiality in arbitration: a role for the new IBA Rules", IBA Arbitration Newsletter, 43~ (2012)
- B. Le Bars, "Paris se donne les moyens d’une grande place d’arbitrage", l’AGEFI HEBDO, ~ (2011)
- Gyooho Lee, "Euro-Korean perspectives on the Use of Arbitration ADR Mechanisms for Solving Intellectual Property Disputes", LCIA Arbitration International, 30(1), pp.91~106 (2014)
- B. L’Hoir, "La Chancellerie replace l’arbitrage français au premier", Droit et Communauté, 5~ (2011)
- L. Kang, "Korea", The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review (2014)
- E. Kleiman, "La réforme du droit de l’arbitrage, sous le double signe de la lisibilité et de l’efficacité", Gazette du Palais, (27), pp.9~ (2011)
- G. L. Kim, "The development of arbitration law and practice in the Republic of Korea", International Arbitration Law Review, 6(Issue 4), pp.134~ (2003)
- K. Kim, "South Korea", Arbitration Guide IBA Arbitration Committee, 3~ (2012)
- K. Kim, "From backstage into the spotlight: the rise of international arbitration in Korea", spec, 4~
- P. Mayer, "Arbitrage : entrée en vigueur d’une procédure plus efficace", Droit et Patrimoine, (203) (2011)
- C. Nourissat, "Le nouveau droit français de l’arbitrage (décret n°2011-48 du 13 janvier 2011 portant réforme de l’arbitrage)", Procédures, (3), pp.3~ (2011)
- G. Notté, "Réforme de l’arbitrage", La Semaine Juridique, Entreprise et affaires, (3), pp.17~ (2011)
- N. Rontchevsky, "L’arbitrage dans les baux commerciaux depuis la loi NRE", Dalloz, AJDI, 270~ (2002)
- A. Ross, "Seoul gets a hearing centre", GAR, ~ (2013)
- Y. S. Lee, "Korean Arbitration and ROC arbitration awards", spec., 2~
- Ch. Seraglini, "Droit de l’arbitrage interne et international", pp.161~ (2013), Montchrétien LGDJ
- D. Thomson, "Seoul centre hosts first case", GAR, 13 (2013)
- D. Thomson, "Seoul court rejects Lone Star enforcement", GAR, 6 (2013)
- D. Thomson, "Seoul court recognizes award that can’t be executed", GAR, 23 (2014)
- Y. Seok Lee, "Know How - Commercial Arbitration –Korea", GAR, 9 (2013)