The Rule of Law and the Human Rights of Women
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is no wonder that there is still some vulnerable groups in society such as women even in the modern era of the rule of law. Even the vulnerability of women gets worse in some areas of law as well as in reality. The reason for this is the ideal of justice and the conception of the rule of law have not been fully figured out. As mentioned in Aristotle and Rawls, distributive which deals with proportionate aspects of return should be considered as well as rectificatory justice. Okin, Cornell, and Butler’s arguments are also in line with distributive justice. On the rule of law, modern legal scholars, including Fuller, Raz, and Tamanaha have demonstrated how much valuable the rule of law is in every aspect of law and society. The value of law was especially well presented in three themes of the rule of law, suggested by Tamanaha. But the rule of law still has limitations as seem in Tamanaha and Raz. Probably, the limitations of the rule of law could be resolved within the ideal of justice and substantial rule of law. Because the conception and application of the formal rule of law have some limitations despite the valuable nature of the formal rule of law, as seen in Tamanaha’s arguments, Cornell, and Butler, it should be remanded In this way, the human rights of women, specially in sexual harassment and patriarchy in family law could be properly resolved in law and society even though it might take time. In case of sexual harassment, the law on sexual harassment could contribute in to eliminating the problem through the formal rule of law. But nevertheless the underlying serious problem of sexual harassment, happening everyday life of people, could find proper solution through the substantive rule of law and the ideal of distributive justice.
Abstract
It is no wonder that there is still some vulnerable groups in society such as women even in the modern era of the rule of law. Even the vulnerability of women gets worse in some areas of law as well as in reality. The reason for this is the ideal of justice and the conception of the rule of law have not been fully figured out. As mentioned in Aristotle and Rawls, distributive which deals with proportionate aspects of return should be considered as well as rectificatory justice. Okin, Cornell, and Butler’s arguments are also in line with distributive justice. On the rule of law, modern legal scholars, including Fuller, Raz, and Tamanaha have demonstrated how much valuable the rule of law is in every aspect of law and society. The value of law was especially well presented in three themes of the rule of law, suggested by Tamanaha. But the rule of law still has limitations as seem in Tamanaha and Raz. Probably, the limitations of the rule of law could be resolved within the ideal of justice and substantial rule of law. Because the conception and application of the formal rule of law have some limitations despite the valuable nature of the formal rule of law, as seen in Tamanaha’s arguments, Cornell, and Butler, it should be remanded In this way, the human rights of women, specially in sexual harassment and patriarchy in family law could be properly resolved in law and society even though it might take time. In case of sexual harassment, the law on sexual harassment could contribute in to eliminating the problem through the formal rule of law. But nevertheless the underlying serious problem of sexual harassment, happening everyday life of people, could find proper solution through the substantive rule of law and the ideal of distributive justice.
참고문헌 (36)
- 차선자, "표현의 자유와 성희롱 - 대상이 특정되지 않은 성적언동을 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 35(1), pp.279~313 (2015), 법학연구소
- 조주현, "대학내 교수성희롱의 성차별적 특징: 세 대학 사례를 중심으로", 젠더와 문화, 1(1), pp.219~258 (2008), 여성학연구소[DOI]
- 강동욱, "직장내 성희롱에 대한 국가인권위원회의 결정과 법원의 판단의 비교고찰", 한양법학, (35), pp.541~562 (2011), 한양법학회
- Kang, In-Young, "Review on Feminine Interpretation and Application of the Concept in Sexual Harassment: with Focus on the Decisions of National Human Rights Commission of Korea", Ewha Journal of Gender and Law, 4(1) (2012)
- 김엘림, "교수의 성희롱에 관한 법적 분쟁", 법학논집, 20(3), pp.281~320 (2016), 법학연구소
- 남윤삼, "미국 성명법에서 자녀의 성(姓) 결정과 이름부여에 대한 논쟁", 법학논총, 28(3), pp.105~146 (2016), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이영애, "대학 내 성희롱·성폭력 피해 실태에 관한 연구 -중·소도시 대학생들에 대한 시계열연구", 피해자학연구, 20(2), pp.31~54 (2012), 한국피해자학회
- 위선주, "자녀의 성‧본 변경을 통해 본 부계가족의 정상성과 어머니의 지위", 젠더와 문화, 6(1), pp.43~81 (2013), 여성학연구소
- Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics" (1999), Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
- Baer, Susan, "Dignity or Equality? Responses to Workplace Harassment in Europe, Germany, and U. S. Law" (2012), Yale University Press
- Bennett, Mark, "Hart and Raz on the Non-Instrumental Moral Value of the Rule of Law: A Reconsideration", Law & Philosophy, 30(5) (2011)
- Butler, Judith, "Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity" (2006), Routledge
- Cornell, Drucilla, "Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice" (1992), Routledge
- Foucault, Michel, "The History of Sexuality: An Introduction Volume I (Reissue)" (1990), Vintage
- Lon L. Fuller, "The Morality of Law" (1969), Yale University Press
- Lon L. Fuller, "Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart", Harvard Law Review, 71(4) (1958)
- Irigaray, Luce, "The Irigaray Reader" (1991), Blackwell
- MacKinnon, Catharine, "Directions in Sexual Harassment Law" (2012), Yale University Press
- Murphy, Colleen, "Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law", Law and Philosophy, 24(3) (2005)
- Okin, Susan Moller, "Justice, Gender and the Family Law" (1989), Basic Books, Inc
- Rawls, John, "A Theory of Justice" (1999), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
- Raz, Joseph, "The Authority of Law" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Sellers, Mortimer, "On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory Brian Z. Tamanaha", Law and History Review, 25(1) (2007)
- Tamanaha, Brian Z., "On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Wall, Edmund, "Sexual Harassment" (2000), Prometheus Books
- "The Supreme Court of Korea 1998. 2. 10. 95Da39533", ~ (1998)
- "The Supreme Court of Korea 2008. 7. 10. 2007Du22498", ~ (2008)
- "The Supreme Court of Korea 2016. 1. 31. 2015Do15669", ~ (2016)
- "Alexander vs. Yale University, 459 F. Supp. 1 (1977)", ~ (1977)
- "Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998)", ~ (1998)
- "Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (1993)", ~ (1993)
- "Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 US 57 (1986)", ~ (1986)
- "Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989)", ~ (1989)
- "Ribero vs. Monahan, 524 A.2d 586 (1987)", ~ (1987)
- G.R.C. Davis, "Magna Carta" (1963), British Museum