성희롱에 대한 법적 규제와 여성주체의 문제: 하버마스와 포스트모더니즘의 비판
The Legal Regulation of Sexual Harassment and Women as Subjects: Addressing the Perspectives of Habermas and Postmodernism
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
This paper deals with the issues when feminists take law as a strategic way to address sexual harassment. In particular, it focuses on how women as subjects are created if protective law is taken to tackle sexual harassment. Firstly of all, by relying on MacKinnon’s feminist jurisprudence which lays a foundation to provide sexual harassment policies, it is addressed what sexual harassment law aims at so that it provides a basis for a further criticism of sexual harassment law. This criticism can be found in the theories of Habermas and postmodernism. From the view of Habermas's dicourse theory, sexual harassment law may distort the autonomy of women as subjects although it originally aims at gender equality. According to postmodern feminism, sexual harassment law tends to provide women with a fixed idea of a sexually pure and vulnerable victim. Ironically, this is the stereotypes of gender identity of men and women that sexual harassment law originally tries to correct. Concerning these problems, this paper suggests that, rather than law legal approaches, more flexible and contextualized approaches to sexual harassment should be adopted as a way to prohibit sexual harassment.
참고문헌 (22)
- J. Conaghan, "Feminist Theory and Legal Strategy" (1993), Blackwell
- D. Cornell, "The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography & Sexual Harassment", pp.21~ (1995), Routledge
- J. L. Cohen, "Regulating Intimacy: A New Legal Paradigm", pp.2~ (2002), Princeton University Press
- C. A. MacKinnon, "Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination", pp.1~ (1979), Yale University Press
- C. A. MacKinnon, "Only Words", pp.45~ (1993), Harvard University Press
- C. Smart, "Feminism and the Power of Law", pp.8~ (1998), Routledge
- J. Habermas, "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd", pp.522~ (1981)
- J. Habermas, "사실성과 타당성", pp.467~486 (2000), 나남
- F. Kübler, "Verrechtlichung von Wirtschaft, Arbeit und sozialer Solidarität" (1984)
- 박은정, "여성 보호입법의 문제를 “평등과 보호의 긴장”의 문제로 해석하는 법철학 의 문제들", pp.239~240 (2007), 박영사
- 이상돈, "법문학", pp.271~341 (2005), 박영사
- K. M. York, "Defining Sexual Harassment in Workplaces: A Policy-capturing Approach", Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), pp.831~ (1989)
- J. L. Dolkart, "Hostile Environment Harassment: Equality, Objectivity and the Shaping of Legal Standards", Emory Law Journal, 43(1), pp.151~244 (1994)
- E. D. Ermarth, "Postmodernism in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (1998), Routledge
- J. Butler, "Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of ‘Postmodernism’ in Feminists Theorize the Political", pp.9~ (1992), Routledge
- A. P. Harris, "Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory", Stanford Law Review, 42(3), pp.581~616 (1990)
- G. M. Gomes, "Prohibiting Sexual Harassment in the European Union: An Unfinished Public Policy Agenda", Employee Relations, 26(3), pp.296~ (2004)
- H. Barnett, "Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence", pp.173~176 (1998), Cavendish Publishing
- K. M. Franke, "What’s Wrong with Sexual Harassment", Stanford Law Review, 49(4), pp.691~ (1997)
- K. Browne, "Title VII as Censorship: Hostile-Environment Harassment and the First Amendment", Ohio State Law Journal, 52(2), pp.488~ (1991)
- D. Cornell, "At the Heart of Freedom", pp.197~ (1998), Princeton University Press
- Beco, "National Human Rights Institutions in Europe", Human Rights Law Review, 7(2), pp.341~370 (2007)