북한의 핵보유와 한반도 평화확보
North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons and Peace-keeping on the Korean Peninsula
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
To non-nuclear state South Korea, the denuclearization of North Korea would be one of its most important national issues. It is also a very important national security issue to Japan and China who are surrounding the Korean Peninsula, and the United States. If, in reality, North Korea becomes a nuclear state, the following astonishing changes regarding the security situation of the Korean Peninsula and its vicinity will occur: (1) non-nuclear state South Korea will become a hostage of nuclear state North Korea; (2) the asymmetry of military power between the two Koreas will make the gap more severe; (3) North Korea may blatantly threat nuclear attack against the U.S. and Japan; (4) The Korean Peninsula, Japan, and the U.S. will be “Within one war theater”, which means the all three nations will be within North Korea nuclear attack’s arms length; (5) South Korea, the U.S., and China will unite slowly in order to achieve a common goal, “North Korea’s denuclearization”; (6) “Nuclear state North Korea” means that more explosive compounds are going to be added to original Northeast warehouse, North Korea. There might be two ways to ensure the survival of South Korea from North Korea’s nuclear weapons. The first way is maintaining peace on the Korean peninsula by “the denuclearization of North Korea” with pulling all strings South Korea can. The second way is to “create a balance of terror”, which is blocking North Korea from using its nuclear weapons. To “the denuclearization of North Korea”, four ways are being discussed: (1) By dialogue and negotiation; (2) By highly strengthening sanctions on North Korea; (3) By Preemptive attack; (4) By qualitative change of North Korean regime or by removal of the regime. Likewise, “to create a balance of terror”, four ways are being discussed; (1) Relocating the U.S. nuclear umbrella; (2) Strengthening and improving the US combined defense system; (3) Strengthening South Korea and China’s strategic cooperation; (4) Developing South Korea’s own nuclear weapons.
Abstract
To non-nuclear state South Korea, the denuclearization of North Korea would be one of its most important national issues. It is also a very important national security issue to Japan and China who are surrounding the Korean Peninsula, and the United States. If, in reality, North Korea becomes a nuclear state, the following astonishing changes regarding the security situation of the Korean Peninsula and its vicinity will occur: (1) non-nuclear state South Korea will become a hostage of nuclear state North Korea; (2) the asymmetry of military power between the two Koreas will make the gap more severe; (3) North Korea may blatantly threat nuclear attack against the U.S. and Japan; (4) The Korean Peninsula, Japan, and the U.S. will be “Within one war theater”, which means the all three nations will be within North Korea nuclear attack’s arms length; (5) South Korea, the U.S., and China will unite slowly in order to achieve a common goal, “North Korea’s denuclearization”; (6) “Nuclear state North Korea” means that more explosive compounds are going to be added to original Northeast warehouse, North Korea. There might be two ways to ensure the survival of South Korea from North Korea’s nuclear weapons. The first way is maintaining peace on the Korean peninsula by “the denuclearization of North Korea” with pulling all strings South Korea can. The second way is to “create a balance of terror”, which is blocking North Korea from using its nuclear weapons. To “the denuclearization of North Korea”, four ways are being discussed: (1) By dialogue and negotiation; (2) By highly strengthening sanctions on North Korea; (3) By Preemptive attack; (4) By qualitative change of North Korean regime or by removal of the regime. Likewise, “to create a balance of terror”, four ways are being discussed; (1) Relocating the U.S. nuclear umbrella; (2) Strengthening and improving the US combined defense system; (3) Strengthening South Korea and China’s strategic cooperation; (4) Developing South Korea’s own nuclear weapons.
참고문헌 (36)
- 국방부, "전시작전통제권 전환 시기 조정에 대한 올바른 이해", ~ (2010)
- 국방부, "국방개혁 2020(안)", 성우회원초청 정책설명회, ~ (2005)
- 김태우, "북핵을 넘어 통일로" (2012), 명인문화사
- 남만권, "북핵문제와 한반도 안보" (2008), KIDA Press
- 매일경제신문사, "미․중 사이에서 고뇌하는 한국의 외교․안보: 연미화중으로 푼다", ~ (2011)
- 미래한국, "대한민국도 핵을 개발해야 한다", 안보심포지움11-1, pp.3~ (2011)
- 북한 핵 보유 고수 전략의 도전과 대응, "박형중", 통일연구원, ~ (2010)
- 박휘락, "북한 핵에 대한 대응방안 모색: 선제행동(preemptive actions) 검토의 필요성을 중심으로", 국방정책연구, 27(2)통권 : 92, pp.101~131 (2011), 한국국방연구원
- 북한 핵의 국제정치와 한국의 대북 핵전략, "배정호", 통일연구원, ~ (2011)
- 신성호, "핵비확산체제의 위기와 한국" (2010), 도서출판 오름
- 북한핵 대응책은 무엇인가: G2시대 생존전략, "세종대학교", ~ (2011)
- 평화와 공동번영의 신동북아시대 모색, "세종연구소", ~ (2011)
- 송대성, "북한 제3차 핵실험이후 대응전략", 천안함 폭침 3주기 과제와 북 핵위기의 대응 (2013), 자유민주학회
- 송대성, "북핵문제와 전시작전통제권 전환 문제, In 북핵문제와 전작권 전환(한미연합사 해체) 어떻게 할 것인가?", 한국선진화포럼 특별토론회 (2013), 한국선진화포럼
- 송대성, "이스라엘 국가안보: 지혜, 경험, 그리고 교훈, In 정보환경변화와 국가정보 발전전략", 2011 한국국가정보학회 학술회의, 2011, ~[DOI]
- 윤정원, "오바마 정부 출범 이후 북핵문제와 우리의 대응책", 전략연구, 16(46)통권 : 46, pp.112~144 (2009), 한국전략문제연구소
- 북한의 정상국가화 지원방안 연구, "이교덕", ~ (2010)
- 북한에 대한 강압: 성과와 전략, "이동선", 한국전략문제연구소, ~, pp.KRIS 수시보고서 2012-1 (2012)
- 김영호, "한미동맹 로드맵" (2008), 세종연구소
- 북한 핵과 DIME 구상, "전경만", 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2010)
- 미국의 대한 핵우산정책에 관한 연구, "전성훈", 통일연구원, ~ (2012)
- "김정은 세습후계체제의 특성과 대내외 정책 전망", 戰略硏究, 18(2)통권 : 52 (2011), 한국전략문제연구소
- 한국위기관리연구소, "전작권 전환, 이대로 가야 하나?", 2010 한미국방정책 토론회 (2010)
- 북한의 3차 핵실험 전후 대책, "한국전략문제연구소", ~ (2011)
- 북한의 핵전략과 한국의 전략적 선택, "한국전략문제연구소", ~ (2013)
- 북한 핵문제의 전망과 대응책: 정책결정모델(Decision Making Model)을 이용한 전략분석, "홍우택", 통일연구원, ~ (2012)
- 대북한 핵협상 전략구상방향, "홍우택", 통일연구원, ~ (2011)
- Defense White Paper, "Ministry of National Defense", ~ (2012)
- Acton, James M, "Deterrence During Disarmament: Deep Nuclear Reductions and International Security" (2011)
- Blum, William, "Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower" (2005), Common Courage Press
- Peace and Stability in Asia Pacific Region: Assessment of the Security Architecture, "Gera, Maj Gen YK", United Service Institution of India, ~ (2011)
- Goldstein, Joshua S, "International Relations" (1996), HarperCollins Publishers Inc
- The Japan Times, "East Asian Strategic Review 2009", ~
- Ogilvie-White, Tanya, "On Nuclear Deterrence", IISS, ~ (2011)
- Perry, William, J, "Review of the United States Policy toward North Korea: Findings and Recommendations", ~ (1999)
- Przystup, James J, "Dealing with the Twin Dangers of Proliferation and Instability", presented at the Korean Research Institute for Strategy (KRIS) Symposium on “The Strategic Balance in Northeast Asia and North Korea’s Nuclear Armament.” (2009)