Evaluation of Peak-Fitting Software for Magnesium Quantification through k0-Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The selection and effective utilization of peak-fitting software for conventional gamma-ray spectrumanalysis is significant for accurate determination of the mass fraction of elements, particularly in complexpeak regions. Majority of the peak-fitting programs can derive similar peak characteristics for singletpeaks, but very few programs can deconvolute multi-peaks in a complex region. The deconvolution ofmulti-peaks requires special peak-fitting functions, such as left and right-skew distributions. In the thisstudy, 843.76 keV (27Mg) peak area from the complex region (840 keVe850 keV) determined andcompared using four different peak-fitting programs, namely, GammaVision, Genie2000, HyperLab, andHyperGam. The 843.76 keV peak interfered with 841.63 keV (152mEu) and 846.81 keV (56Mn). The totalMg concentration was determined through k0-instrumental neutron activation analysis by applying theisotopic interference correction factor 27Al(n,p)27Mg through the simultaneous determination of Alconcentration. HyperLab and HyperGam peak-fitting programs reported consistent peak areas, andresultant concentrations agreed with the certified values of matrix-certified reference materials.
Abstract
The selection and effective utilization of peak-fitting software for conventional gamma-ray spectrumanalysis is significant for accurate determination of the mass fraction of elements, particularly in complexpeak regions. Majority of the peak-fitting programs can derive similar peak characteristics for singletpeaks, but very few programs can deconvolute multi-peaks in a complex region. The deconvolution ofmulti-peaks requires special peak-fitting functions, such as left and right-skew distributions. In the thisstudy, 843.76 keV (27Mg) peak area from the complex region (840 keVe850 keV) determined andcompared using four different peak-fitting programs, namely, GammaVision, Genie2000, HyperLab, andHyperGam. The 843.76 keV peak interfered with 841.63 keV (152mEu) and 846.81 keV (56Mn). The totalMg concentration was determined through k0-instrumental neutron activation analysis by applying theisotopic interference correction factor 27Al(n,p)27Mg through the simultaneous determination of Alconcentration. HyperLab and HyperGam peak-fitting programs reported consistent peak areas, andresultant concentrations agreed with the certified values of matrix-certified reference materials.
참고문헌 (24)
- J. -D. Wilhelm, "Magnesium basics", Clin. Kidney J, 5, pp.3~14 (2012)[DOI]
- L. J. Dominguez, "Magnesium and hypertension in old age", Nutrients, 13, pp.139~ (2021)
- R. R. Greenberg, "Neutron activation analysis : a primary method of measurement", Spectrochim. Acta B, 66(3-4), pp.193~241 (2011)
- R. Jacimovic, "k0-NAA quality assessment by analysis of different certified reference materials using the KAYZERO", SOLCOI software, 2003, pp.257(3), 659~663
- H. Cho, "Application of the INAA methods for KRISS infant formula CRM analysis : standardization of INAA at KRISS", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 322, pp.1537~1547 (2019)
- F. De Corte, "The K0-Standardization Method : a Move to the Optimization of Neutron Activation Analysis", pp.1987
- G. Kennedy, "Measurement of some primary nuclear interferences in neutron activation analysis with a SLOWPOKE reactor", Can. J. Chem, 64, pp.790~792 (1986)
- "k0 Database" (2020)[URL]
- Vade Mecum for K0-Users, "F. De Corte", DSM Research, ~ (1994)
- "User's Manual for reactor neutron activation analysis (NAA) using the k0standardization method", Kayzero for Windows (KayWin®) Version 3.30, ~ (2017)
- M. Blaauw, "The 1995 IAEA intercomparison of g-ray spectrum analysis software", Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 387, pp.416~432 (1997)
- 박병건, "NEW DEVELOPMENT OF HYPERGAM AND ITS TEST OF PERFORMANCE FOR γ-RAY SPECTRUM ANALYSIS", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 44(7), pp.781~790 (2012), 한국원자력학회
- A. Simonits, "HyperLab : a new concept in gammaray spectrum analysis", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 257, pp.589~595 (2003)
- J. M. Los Arcos, "The 2002 IAEA test spectra for low-level g-ray spectrometry software", Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 536, pp.189~195 (2005)
- C. A. Kalfas, "SPECTRW : a software package for nuclear and atomic spectroscopy", Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 830, pp.265~274 (2016)
- L. Szentmiklosi, "Fitting special peak shapes of prompt gamma spectra", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 315, pp.663~670 (2018)
- "HyperLab User's Manual for Gamma Spectroscopy Software" (2014)[URL]
- R. Acharya, "Performance of digital gamma ray spectrometer for loss free counting and its application to NAA using short-lived radionuclides", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 302, pp.1333~1337 (2014)
- C. S. Park, "Status of developing HPGe g-ray spectrum analysis code HYPERGAM", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 50, pp.389~393 (2008)
- "GammaVision Gamma Spectroscopy Software User's Manual" (2016)[URL]
- "Genie2000 Basic Spectroscopy Software User's Manual" (2006)[URL]
- H. Cho, "Application of k0-INAA method in preliminary characterization of KRISS urban airborne particulate matter certified reference material", Appl. Sci, 10(19), pp.6649~ (2020)
- K. B. Dasari, "Chemical composition of Asian dust in Daejeon, Korea, during the spring season", ACS Earth Space Chem, 4(8), pp.1227~1236 (2020)
- R. Jacimovic, "Error in k0-NAA measurement due to temporal variation in the neutron flux in TRIGA Mark II reactor", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 294(1), pp.155~161 (2012)
