No difference in long‑term functional outcomes or survivorship after total knee arthroplasty with or without computer navigation: a 17‑year survivorship analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The literature comparing the long-term outcomes and survivorship of computer navigation-assisted and conventional total knee replacement (TKR) is sparse. Moreover, of the available comparative studies with followup duration of more than 10 years, the results seem to be conflicting. The purpose of this long-term study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, and implant survivorship, of TKR performed with and without computer navigation. Methods: We retrospectively compared the results of 49 computer-navigated TKRs and 139 conventional TKRs. The mean age of the patients was 67.9 (range 52–81) years for the navigation group and 67.1 (range 50–80) years for the conventional TKR group. The mean duration of follow-up for the conventional and navigation TKR groups was 12.9 and 13.2 years, respectively. Clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations of the patients were performed at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-operatively, and at 1-year intervals thereafter. Results: There were no significant differences in the post-operative Knee Society knee and function score between the two groups. The mean overall deviation from neutral alignment and the radiological outliers were significantly higher in the conventional TKR group. The overall survival rates at 17 years were 92.9% for the navigation group and 95.6% for the conventional TKR group (p = 0.62). Conclusions: Navigated TKR resulted in fewer radiological outliers; however, this did not translate to better long-term functional outcomes or implant survival.
Abstract
Background: The literature comparing the long-term outcomes and survivorship of computer navigation-assisted and conventional total knee replacement (TKR) is sparse. Moreover, of the available comparative studies with followup duration of more than 10 years, the results seem to be conflicting. The purpose of this long-term study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, and implant survivorship, of TKR performed with and without computer navigation. Methods: We retrospectively compared the results of 49 computer-navigated TKRs and 139 conventional TKRs. The mean age of the patients was 67.9 (range 52–81) years for the navigation group and 67.1 (range 50–80) years for the conventional TKR group. The mean duration of follow-up for the conventional and navigation TKR groups was 12.9 and 13.2 years, respectively. Clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations of the patients were performed at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-operatively, and at 1-year intervals thereafter. Results: There were no significant differences in the post-operative Knee Society knee and function score between the two groups. The mean overall deviation from neutral alignment and the radiological outliers were significantly higher in the conventional TKR group. The overall survival rates at 17 years were 92.9% for the navigation group and 95.6% for the conventional TKR group (p = 0.62). Conclusions: Navigated TKR resulted in fewer radiological outliers; however, this did not translate to better long-term functional outcomes or implant survival.
참고문헌 (33)
- Weng YJ, "Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 24(5), pp.668~673 (2009)[DOI]
- Bäthis H, "Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique", J Bone Jt Surg Br, 86(5), pp.682~687 (2004)[DOI]
- Haaker RG, "Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 433, pp.152~159 (2005)[DOI]
- Anderson KC, "Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods", J Arthroplasty, 20(7), pp.132~138 (2005)[DOI]
- Keyes BJ, "Evaluation of limb alignment, component positioning, and function in primary total knee arthroplasty using a pinless navigation technique compared with conventional methods", J Knee Surg, 26(02), pp.127~132 (2013)
- Jones CW, "Current role of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 33(7), pp.1989~1993 (2018)[DOI]
- Kim YH, "Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial", J Bone Jt Surg Am, 94(22), pp.2017~2024 (2012)[DOI]
- Baumbach JA, "10-year survival of navigated versus conventional TKAs: a retrospective study", Orthopedics, 39(3 Suppl), pp.S72~S76 (2016)[DOI]
- Kim YH, "The clinical outcome of computernavigated compared with conventional knee arthroplasty in the same patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, long-term study", J Bone Jt Surg Am, 99(12), pp.989~996 (2017)[DOI]
- Cheng T, "Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty", J Surg Res, 171(2), pp.590~600 (2011)[DOI]
- de Steiger RN, "Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age", J Bone Jt Surg Am, 97(8), pp.635~642 (2015)[DOI]
- Ritter MA, "Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 299, pp.153~156 (1994)
- Berend ME, "Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 428, pp.26~34 (2004)[DOI]
- Insall JN, "Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 248, pp.13~14 (1989)
- Ewald FC, "The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 248, pp.9~12 (1989)
- Choong PF, "Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 24(4), pp.560~569 (2009)[DOI]
- Ensini A, "Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 457, pp.156~162 (2007)[DOI]
- Burnett RS, "Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(1), pp.264~276 (2013)[DOI]
- Cheng T, "Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 20(7), pp.1307~1322 (2012)[DOI]
- Huang T-W, "Total knee arthroplasty with use of computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional guiding systems in the same patient:radiographic results in Asian patients", JBJS, 93(13), pp.1197~1202 (2011)[DOI]
- Mason JB, "Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery", J Arthroplasty, 22(8), pp.1097~1106 (2007)[DOI]
- Bauwens K, "Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis", J Bone Jt Surg Am, 89(2), pp.261~269 (2007)[DOI]
- Mielke RK, "Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation—preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique", Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 139(2), pp.109~116 (2001)[DOI]
- Jenny JY, "Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case–control comparative study with classical instrumentation", Comput Aided Surg, 6(4), pp.217~220 (2001)[DOI]
- Brin YS, "Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies", Int Orthop, 35(3), pp.331~339 (2011)[DOI]
- Hetaimish BM, "Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 27(6), pp.1177~1182 (2012)[DOI]
- Fu Y, "Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 20(6), pp.1075~1082 (2012)[DOI]
- Rhee SJ, "A comparison of long-term outcomes of computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", JBJS, 101(20), pp.1875~1885 (2019)[DOI]
- "Australian_Orthopaedic_Association_National_Joint_Replacement_Registry_(AOANJRR): Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty Annual Report 2020"[URL]
- "National_Joint_Registry_17th_Annual_Report_2020"[URL]
- Antonios JK, "Trends in computer navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis of patient and hospital factors", Arthroplast Today, 5(1), pp.88~95 (2019)[DOI]
- Bottros J, "The use of navigation in total knee arthroplasty for patients with extra-articular deformity", J Arthroplasty, 23(1), pp.74~78 (2008)[DOI]
- Lee C-Y, "The benefits of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty on coronal alignment with marked femoral bowing in Asian patients", J Orthop Surg Res, 9(1), pp.122~ (2014)[DOI]