The use of imageless navigation to quantify cutting error in total knee arthroplasty
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves implant alignment by providing feedback on resection parameters based on femoral and tibial cutting guide positions. However, saw blade thickness, deflection, and cutting guide motion may lead to final bone cuts differing from planned resections, potentially contributing to suboptimal component alignment. We used an imageless navigation device to intraoperatively quantify the magnitude of error between planned and actual resections, hypothesizing final bone cuts will differ from planned alignment. A retrospective study including 60 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA using a novel imageless navigation device was conducted. Device measurements of resection parameters were obtained via attachment of optical trackers to femoral and tibial cutting guides prior to resection. Following resection, optical trackers were placed directly on the bone cut surface and measurements were recorded. Cutting guide and bone resection measurements of both femoral and tibial varus/valgus, femoral flexion, tibial slope angles, and both femoral and tibial medial and lateral resection depths were compared using a Student's t -test. Femoral cutting guide position differed from the actual cut by an average 0.6 ± 0.5° ( p = 0.85) in the varus/valgus angle and 1.0 ± 1.0° ( p = 0.003) in the flexion/extension angle. The difference between planned and actual cut measurements for medial and lateral femoral resection depth was 1.1 ± 1.1 mm ( p = 0.32) and 1.2 ± 1.0 mm ( p = 0.067), respectively. Planned cut measurements based on tibial guide position differed from the actual cut by an average of 0.9 ± 0.8° ( p = 0.63) in the varus/valgus angle and 1.1 ± 1.0° ( p = 0.95) in slope angle. Measurement of medial and lateral tibial resection depth differed by an average of 0.1 ± 1.8 mm ( p = 0.78) and 0.2 ± 2.1 mm ( p = 0.85), respectively. Significant discrepancies between planned and actual femoral bone resection were demonstrated for flexion/extension angle, likely the result of cutting error. Our data highlights the importance of cut verification postresection to confirm planned resections are achieved, and suggests imageless navigation may be a source of feedback that would allow surgeons to intraoperatively adjust resections to achieve optimal implant alignment.
Abstract
Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves implant alignment by providing feedback on resection parameters based on femoral and tibial cutting guide positions. However, saw blade thickness, deflection, and cutting guide motion may lead to final bone cuts differing from planned resections, potentially contributing to suboptimal component alignment. We used an imageless navigation device to intraoperatively quantify the magnitude of error between planned and actual resections, hypothesizing final bone cuts will differ from planned alignment. A retrospective study including 60 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA using a novel imageless navigation device was conducted. Device measurements of resection parameters were obtained via attachment of optical trackers to femoral and tibial cutting guides prior to resection. Following resection, optical trackers were placed directly on the bone cut surface and measurements were recorded. Cutting guide and bone resection measurements of both femoral and tibial varus/valgus, femoral flexion, tibial slope angles, and both femoral and tibial medial and lateral resection depths were compared using a Student's t -test. Femoral cutting guide position differed from the actual cut by an average 0.6 ± 0.5° ( p = 0.85) in the varus/valgus angle and 1.0 ± 1.0° ( p = 0.003) in the flexion/extension angle. The difference between planned and actual cut measurements for medial and lateral femoral resection depth was 1.1 ± 1.1 mm ( p = 0.32) and 1.2 ± 1.0 mm ( p = 0.067), respectively. Planned cut measurements based on tibial guide position differed from the actual cut by an average of 0.9 ± 0.8° ( p = 0.63) in the varus/valgus angle and 1.1 ± 1.0° ( p = 0.95) in slope angle. Measurement of medial and lateral tibial resection depth differed by an average of 0.1 ± 1.8 mm ( p = 0.78) and 0.2 ± 2.1 mm ( p = 0.85), respectively. Significant discrepancies between planned and actual femoral bone resection were demonstrated for flexion/extension angle, likely the result of cutting error. Our data highlights the importance of cut verification postresection to confirm planned resections are achieved, and suggests imageless navigation may be a source of feedback that would allow surgeons to intraoperatively adjust resections to achieve optimal implant alignment.
참고문헌 (32)
- Feng JE, "Total knee arthroplasty : improving outcomes with a multidisciplinary approach", J Multidiscip Healthc, 11, pp.63~73 (2018)
- Steinhaus ME, "Total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis : support for a foregone conclusion?", HSS J, 13(2), pp.207~210 (2017)
- Yau WP, "Cutting errors in total knee replacement : assessment by computer assisted surgery", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 16(7), pp.670~673 (2008)
- Longstaff LM, "Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function", J Arthroplasty, 24(4), pp.570~578 (2009)
- Choong PF, "Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 24(4), pp.560~569 (2009)
- Stucinskas J, "Moderate varus", valgus malalignment after total knee arthroplasty has little effect on knee function or muscle strength, 2015, pp.86(6), 728~733
- Kim YH, "The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis", Int Orthop, 38(2), pp.379~385 (2014)
- Sikorski JM, "Alignment in total knee replacement", J Bone Jt Surg Br, 90(9), pp.1121~1127 (2008)
- Jeffery RS, "Coronal alignment after total knee replacement", J Bone Jt Surg Br, 73(5), pp.709~714 (1991)
- Helmy N, "Accuracy of patient specific cutting blocks in total knee arthroplasty", Biomed Res Int, 2014, pp.562919~ (2014)
- Plaskos C, "Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 17(6), pp.698~705 (2002)
- Otani T, "Cutting errors in preparation of femoral components in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 8(5), pp.503~510 (1993)
- Nakahara H, "Cutting error of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty by use of a navigation system", J Arthroplasty, 27(6), pp.1119~1122 (2012)
- Mont MA, "Intramedullary goniometer can improve alignment in knee arthroplasty surgery", J Arthroplasty, 12(3), pp.332~336 (1997)
- Minns R, "Surgical instrument design for the accurate cutting of bone for implant fixation", Clin Mater, 10(4), pp.207~212 (1992)
- Parisi TJ, "Coronal alignment in tka: traditional principles versus new concepts", Reconstr Rev (2018)[DOI]
- Bonner TJ, "The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years", J Bone Jt Surg Br, 93(9), pp.1217~1222 (2011)
- Cherian JJ, "Mechanical, anatomical, and kinematic axis in TKA : concepts and practical applications", Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 7(2), pp.89~95 (2014)
- Werner FW, "The effect of valgus", varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements, 2005, pp.38(2), 349~355
- Elloy MA, "Accuracy of intramedullary alignment in total knee replacement", J Biomed Eng, 14(5), pp.363~370 (1992)
- Toksvig-Larsen S, "Surface characteristics following tibial preparation during total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 9(1), pp.63~66 (1994)
- Foley KA, "Improving accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric comparison of a new surgical navigation tool, Intellijoint KNEE, with computed tomography imaging" (2019), Intellijoint Surgical, Inc
- Hsu RW, "Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty: the outcomes at mid-term follow-up", Medicine (Baltimore), 98(47), pp.e18083~ (2019)
- Winemaker MJ, "Perfect balance in total knee arthroplasty : the elusive compromise", J Arthroplasty, 17(1), pp.2~10 (2002)
- Chua KH, "Navigated total knee arthroplasty : is it error-free?", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(3), pp.643~649 (2014)
- Catani F, "Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty", J Bone Jt Surg Am, 90(4), pp.765~771 (2008)
- Koh YG, "Effect of sagittal femoral component alignment on biomechanics after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty", J Orthop Surg Res, 14(1), pp.400~ (2019)
- Brooks P, "Seven cuts to the perfect total knee", Orthopedics (2009)[DOI]
- Laskin RS, "Computer-assisted navigation in TKA : where we are and where we are going", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 452, pp.127~131 (2006)
- Lee D, "Osteoporosis affects component positioning in computer navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty", Knee, 19(3), pp.203~207 (2012)
- Schnurr C, "How much tibial resection is required in total knee arthroplasty?", Int Orthop, 35(7), pp.989~994 (2011)
- Haas SB, "Posterior stabilized knee arthroplasty : an assessment of bone resection", Knee, 7(1), pp.25~29 (2000)