본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of an Accelerometer-Based Portable Navigation System, Patient-Specific Instrumentation, and Conventional Instrumentation for Femoral Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

5

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: The KneeAlign2 (KA2, OrthoAlign Inc.) accelerometer-based portable navigation system and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI; Signature, ZimmerBiomet) are widely used for ideal femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there has been no comparative study of the KA2 system, PSI, and conventional intramedullary instrumentation (CON). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy in achieving proper femoral component alignment and clinical features by using the KA2 navigation system, PSI, and CON. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively compared the accuracy of femoral component alignment of 34 TKAs performed with the KA2 system for implantation of the femoral component, 32 TKAs with PSI, and 33 TKAs with CON. Results: In the coronal plane, use of the KA2 system was more likely to result in optimal femoral component alignment than the CON and PSI (p<0.01). In the sagittal plane, use of the KA2 system was more likely to result in optimal component alignment than PSI, but the difference between the KA2 and CON was insignificant. Conclusions: The portable accelerometer-based KA2 navigation system enabled ideal femoral implantation in the coronal and sagittal planes, as compared to the PSI or CON.

Abstract

Purpose: The KneeAlign2 (KA2, OrthoAlign Inc.) accelerometer-based portable navigation system and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI; Signature, ZimmerBiomet) are widely used for ideal femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there has been no comparative study of the KA2 system, PSI, and conventional intramedullary instrumentation (CON). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy in achieving proper femoral component alignment and clinical features by using the KA2 navigation system, PSI, and CON. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively compared the accuracy of femoral component alignment of 34 TKAs performed with the KA2 system for implantation of the femoral component, 32 TKAs with PSI, and 33 TKAs with CON. Results: In the coronal plane, use of the KA2 system was more likely to result in optimal femoral component alignment than the CON and PSI (p<0.01). In the sagittal plane, use of the KA2 system was more likely to result in optimal component alignment than PSI, but the difference between the KA2 and CON was insignificant. Conclusions: The portable accelerometer-based KA2 navigation system enabled ideal femoral implantation in the coronal and sagittal planes, as compared to the PSI or CON.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Matsuda S, "Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.127~133 (2013)
  2. Ritter MA, "The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, pp.1588~1596 (2011)
  3. Kim SJ, "Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment", J Arthroplasty, 20(7 Suppl 3), pp.123~131 (2005)
  4. 문영완, "Clinical Outcome of IM-Guided Total Knee Arthroplasty with Inappropriate Femoral Resection in Coronal Plane", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 25(1), pp.19~24 (2013), 대한슬관절학회
  5. Rosenberger RE, "Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 16, pp.249~257 (2008)
  6. Church JS, "Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, pp.481~485 (2007)
  7. Duwelius PJ, "The effects of femoral intramedullary reaming on pulmonary function in a sheep lung model", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 79, pp.194~202 (1997)
  8. Mizu-uchi H, "The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90, pp.1025~1031 (2008)
  9. Barrett WP, "Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 26, pp.1273~1284 (2011)
  10. Mason JB, "Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery", J Arthroplasty, 22, pp.1097~1106 (2007)
  11. Yamagami R, "Myositis ossificans after navigated knee surgery : a report of two cases and literature review", Knee, 23, pp.561~564 (2016)
  12. Nam D, "Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty : a comparison of radiographic results", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.255~261 (2013)
  13. Thienpont E, "A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement", Bone Joint J, 96, pp.1052~1061 (2014)
  14. Ng VY, "Comparison of custom to standard TKA instrumentation with computed tomography", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22, pp.1833~1842 (2014)
  15. Anderl W, "Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24, pp.102~111 (2016)
  16. Victor J, "Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty : a prospective randomized controlled trial", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, pp.263~271 (2014)
  17. Stronach BM, "Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty provides no improvement in component alignment", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.1705~1708 (2014)
  18. Steinhaus ME, "Handheld navigation device and patient-specific cutting guides result in similar coronal alignment for primary total knee arthroplasty : a retrospective matched cohort study", HSS J, 12, pp.224~234 (2016)
  19. Nadler SB, "Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults", Surgery, 51, pp.224~232 (1962)
  20. Huang EH, "Accuracy of a handheld accelerometer-based navigation system for femoral and tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.1906~1910 (2015)
  21. Yan CH, "Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty : a randomized controlled trial", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 23, pp.3637~3645 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

The Accuracy of Alignment Determined by Patient-Specific Instrumentation System in Total Knee Arthroplasty김광균, 이도경, Jiyoon Eom, Jungsung Kim, Sohui Lim대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2019 · 제31권 제1호Comparison of Precision between Optical and Electromagnetic Navigation Systems in Total Knee Arthroplasty박시환, 서정탁, 이승준, 조희명대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2014 · 제26권 제4호Effects of Femoral Lateral Bowing on Coronal Alignment and Component Position after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Conventional and Navigation­-Assisted Surgery이창락, Chang-Wan Kim대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2018 · 제30권 제1호Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Instrument김광균, 원예연, Stephen M. Howell연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2020 · 제61권 제3호Reliability and Validity of the Femorotibial Mechanical Axis Angle in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Navigation versus Weight Bearing or Supine Whole Leg Radiographs박용범, 이한준, Jung­Won Lim, Min­Ku Song, Seong Hwan Kim대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2018 · 제30권 제4호The use of imageless navigation to quantify cutting error in total knee arthroplastyLamb Iain R., Marwin Scott E., Meftah Morteza, Muir Jeffrey M., Schwarzkopf Ran, Zabat Michelle A.대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2021 · 제33권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)