물질문화의 고고학적 이해와 미술사
Archaeological Understanding of Material Culture and Art History
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article attempts to examine various archaeological approaches hitherto developed for a better interpretation of material culture with reviewing the main paradigm shifts in archaeology, for example, Antiqurianism, Culture-Historical approach, Processual approach, Post-Processual approach. In particular, it is discussed that material culture could be understood as playing an active role in diverse social change rather than a mere record to reflect the past human behaviour, which has been suggested in recent post-processual approaches. Concomitantly, it is explored to how archaeology could suggest a new perspective on the research of the past and the present material culture, based upon a close investigation on various theoretical views with their limits. For example, Marxism and its influence enable us to understand any social change in reference to ideology, power, and hegemony. It is, however, suspicious that there is any essential reality masked by ideology in material culture. It is also stressed that structuralism provides us with a platform to grasp the meaning of material culture and related social action. In spite of its huge impact on archaeological interpretation, it is unlikely that some of the main methodological premise such as binary opposition and arbitrariness should be adopted into the interpretation very carefully. As a result, it is emphasised that archaeology could contribute to a new and better understanding of material culture by way of frequent interchange with other disciplines such as philosophy, sociology and art history as well as systemisation and sophistication of the existing approaches. In addition, classification system of material culture including typology and style is critically reviewed, focusing on how it could be grasped in life world of the period. It is also argued that as an alternative, material culture needs to be comprehended in terms of category and categorisation.
Abstract
This article attempts to examine various archaeological approaches hitherto developed for a better interpretation of material culture with reviewing the main paradigm shifts in archaeology, for example, Antiqurianism, Culture-Historical approach, Processual approach, Post-Processual approach. In particular, it is discussed that material culture could be understood as playing an active role in diverse social change rather than a mere record to reflect the past human behaviour, which has been suggested in recent post-processual approaches. Concomitantly, it is explored to how archaeology could suggest a new perspective on the research of the past and the present material culture, based upon a close investigation on various theoretical views with their limits. For example, Marxism and its influence enable us to understand any social change in reference to ideology, power, and hegemony. It is, however, suspicious that there is any essential reality masked by ideology in material culture. It is also stressed that structuralism provides us with a platform to grasp the meaning of material culture and related social action. In spite of its huge impact on archaeological interpretation, it is unlikely that some of the main methodological premise such as binary opposition and arbitrariness should be adopted into the interpretation very carefully. As a result, it is emphasised that archaeology could contribute to a new and better understanding of material culture by way of frequent interchange with other disciplines such as philosophy, sociology and art history as well as systemisation and sophistication of the existing approaches. In addition, classification system of material culture including typology and style is critically reviewed, focusing on how it could be grasped in life world of the period. It is also argued that as an alternative, material culture needs to be comprehended in terms of category and categorisation.
참고문헌 (42)
- 권택영, "도난당한 편지에 대한 세미나 in: 자크 라캉: 욕망이론", pp.96~134 (1993), 문예출판사
- 김종일, "고고학의 철학적 토대", 한국고고학보, 52, pp.5~33 (2004), 한국고고학회
- 김종일, "경관고고학의 이론적 특징과 적용 가능성", 한국고고학보, (58), pp.110~145 (2006), 한국고고학회
- 김종일, "고고학적 범주화의 철학적 탐구", 고고학, 7(1), pp.51~68 (2008), 서울경기고고학회
- 이남인, "현상학과 해석학" (2004), 서울대학교 출판부
- Adams, W. Y., "Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Binford, Lewis, "An Archaeological Perspective" (1972), Seminar Press
- Bourdieu, Pierre, "Outline of theory of Practice" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Childe, V. Gordon, "Piecing together" (1956), Routledge
- Dietler, Michael, "Habitus, Techniques, Style in: in The Archaeology of Social Boundaries", pp.232~264 (1998), Smithsonian Institution Press
- Ford, James A., "Comment on A.C. Spaulding, Statistical techniques for the discovery of artefact types", American Antiquity, 19, pp.390~391 (1954)
- Ford, James A., "In favor of simple typology", American Antiquity, 27, pp.113~114 (1961)
- Giddens, Anthony, "The Constitution of Society: outline of the theory of Structuration" (1984), Polity Press
- Gräslund, Bo., "The Birth of Prehistoric Chronology" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Hegmon, Michelle, "Archaeological Research on style", Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, pp.517~536 (1992)
- Hegmon, Michelle, "Technologies, Style, and Social Practice: Archaeological Approaches in: The Archaeology of Social Boundaries", pp.264~279 (1998), Smithsonian Institution Press
- Heidegger, Martin, "Being and Time" (1976), Blackwell
- Hodder, Ian, "Reading the past", pp.2~ (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Hodder, Ian, "The Domestication of Europe" (1990), Blackwell
- Hodder, Ian, "Theory and Practice in Archaeology" (1992), Routledge
- Ingold, Tim, "The Perception of the Environment" (2000), Routledge
- Johnson, Mathew, "Archaeological Theory" (1999), Archaeological Theory
- Jones, Si?n, "Archaeology of Ethnicity" (1997), Routledge
- Kehoe, Alice Beck, "The Land of Prehistory" (1998), Routledge
- Kim, Jong-Il, "ormation and Change in Individual Identity between the Bell Beaker Culture and the Early Bronze Age in Bavaria" (2005), Archaeopress
- Lacan, Jacques. E´ crits, "A selection", Routledge
- Montelius, Oscar, "Die typologische Methode. Die ältere kulturperioden im Orient und in Europa I" (1903), Stockholm
- O’Brien, Michael J., "Applying Evolutionary Archaeology: A Systematic Approach", pp.2000, Kluwer Academic
- Sackett, James R., "The Meaning of Style: a General Model", American Antiquity, 42, pp.369~380 (1977)
- Sackett, James R., "Approaches to Style in Lithic Archaeology", Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, pp.59~112 (1982)
- Shanks, Michael, "Ideology, Symbolic Power and Ritual Communication: a Reinterpretation of Neolithic Mortuary Practice in: Symbolic and Structural Archaeology", pp.129~154 (1982), Cambridge University Press
- Shanks, Michael, "Reconstructing Archaeology" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Shanks, Michael, "Social Theory and Archaeology" (1987), Polity
- Spaulding, Albert C., "Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artefact Types", American Antiquity, 18, pp.305~313 (1953)
- Thomas, Julian, "Time, Culture & Identity" (1996), Routledge
- Tilley, Christopher, "Metaphor and Material Culture" (1999), Blackwell
- Tilley, Christopher, "A Phenomenology of Landscape" (1994), Berg
- Tilley, Christopher, "Michel Foucault: Towards Archaeology of Archaeology", pp.281~347 (1990), Blackwell
- Trigger, Bruce, "A History of Archaeological thought" (1989), Cambridge University Press
- Watson, Patty Jo, "Explanation in Archaeology" (1971), Columbia University Press
- Wobst, H. Martin, "Stylistic behaviour and information exchange in: in For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin", Anthropological paper, 61, pp.317~342 (1977)
- Wiessner, Polly, "Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points", American Antiquity, 49, pp.253~276 (1983)