일제강점기의 조선 불교미술 조사와 복원- 한국 불교미술 연구의 출발점 -
The Investigation and Restoration of Joseon Buddhist Art during the Japanese Occupation Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
일제강점기에 이뤄진 조선 불교미술에 대한 조사와 복원, 이에 기반을 둔 문화유산에 대한 인식틀과 미술사적 기반은 오늘날 불교미술 연구에도 여전히 영향을 준다. 당시 보수된 사원과 불상들은 현재까지 우리 불교미술사에서 거론되는 중요한 사료이자 우리 미술사의 정전(正典, canon) 역할을 했다. 이 논문은 일제시대에 복원된 불교미술의 사진 자료를 검토하여 당시 이뤄진 조사와 복원 과정을 확인함으로써 한국 불교미술 연구의 첫 단계가 어떻게 형성되었고, 오늘날의 학문적 토대에 미친 영향이 무엇인지를 알아보려는 연구의 일환이다.
Abstract
Imperial Japan made their scholars investigate historic remains of the Joseon dynasty and repaired the ruined Buddhist temples and images of Buddha by using their own methods. These tasks can be defined as the achievement of the "technological modernization" of historic remains by using their latest techniques which represented the pride of the imperial Japan. The restoration and repair by the Japanese was performed according to their own principles, and there was no space for the participation of the Joseon people. Imperial Japan "made" the restoration of the historic remains, and the colonial Joseon "viewed" the restored historic remains as arts. The Joseon people could not raise any questions about the restoration by the Japanese. They had no objection against the paradigms constructed by the Japanese. These paradigms became the basis for the study of the Buddhist art of Joseon. After the investigation and repair of the historic remains, Japan published photographs. These photographs reveal to us about under what conditions our cultural properties were laid. Except for some temples or Seowon(書院) that were painted in Jingyeongsansuhwa(眞景山水畵) and some ancient maps, there were no visual materials, which tell us about the conditions of the historic remains before the Japanese investigations. Therefore, photographs of the Buddhist relics produced by the Japanese are the meeting point of the pre-modern and modern periods of Joseon. These photographs are the fundamental materials to understand how cultural properties of Joseon, particualy Buddhist art, had changed over time. The History of Joseon Art published by Sekino Tadashi(關野貞) includes most of the Buddhist temples and sculptures, which were investigated and restored during the Japanese occupation period. Accordingly, these photographs have been accepted as the primary canon since the liberation of Joseon from Japan. Therefore, in order to construct our scholarly foundation based on the objective knowledge, we have to examine how our cultural heritages were modified or distorted in their forms by the Japanese scholars and imperial government during the Japanese occupation period. Joseon Gojeok Dobo(『朝鮮古蹟圖譜』), Joseon Misul Daegwan(『朝鮮美術大觀』), and Gyeongju Namsanui Buljeok(『慶州南山の佛蹟』) contain many photographs of the historical remains before and after the restoration. These publications produced in the Japanese occupation era are the earliest catalogues, which were compiled according to the chronological order. They are also the essence of modern technology of using "photography."Most of the images of Buddha, which we now regard as the original forms, actually went through the process of repair by the Japanese. In spite of their inevitable modifications in their forms, we continue our studies based on the assumption that these relics feature the original forms. Japanese-published books on the historical remains of Joseon reveal where the interests of imperial Japan were located. These books were effective in educating the Joseon people of the paradigms constructed by the Japanese. The Joseon people began to open their eyes to "art," "cultural heritage," and "historic remains" as they were instructed by the Japanese. The Joseon people did not understand the Buddhist historical remains and art with their "current" meanings and contexts, but "made them as the heritage of the past, which had no connection with the present." To them, these historical remains meant merely the objects, which required conservation, restoration, and protection. To most of the Joseon people, their cultural heritage was turned into the object of a modern "taste". Korean researchers have kept using the cultural paradigms constructed by the Japanese.
참고문헌 (40)
- "中外日報", ~
- "東亞日報", ~
- "韓國建築調査報告", 6 (1904)
- "朝鮮古蹟圖譜", ~
- 강인욱, "日帝强占期 咸鏡北道 先史時代유적의 조사와 인식", 한국상고사학보, 61(61), pp.5~34 (2008), 한국상고사학회
- 姜仁旭, "鳥居龍藏의 한국선사시대 조사와 그영향", 동북아시아문화학회 2009년 국제학술대회논문집 (2009)
- 강희정, "일본미술사 성립기의 인도미술 인식 - 메이지(明治)기에서 다이쇼(大正)기를 중심으로 -", 인문논총, (60), pp.173~205 (2008), 인문학연구원
- 關野貞, "조선미술사" (2003), 東文選
- 구조선총독부건물시측 및 철거보고서 상, "국립중앙박물관", 국립중앙박물관, ~ (1997)
- 權相老, "新羅의佛敎文化", 朝光, 1(1) (1935)
- 기노시타나가히로, "오카쿠라덴신과 미술사", 미술사논단, 9 (1999)
- 기타자와노리아키, "美術 개념의 형성과 리얼리즘의 轉位: 메이지·다이쇼期의 ‘미술’ 인식에 대하여", 미술사논단, 2 (1995)
- 金春實, "忠南 連山 開泰寺 石造三尊佛考-本像과 右脇侍 菩薩像이 後代의 模作일 가능성에 대하여-", 백제연구총서, 4 (1994)
- 高木博志, "일본 미술사와 조선미술사의 성립, 국사의 신화를 넘어서" (2004), 휴머니스트
- 文明大, "開泰寺 石丈六三尊佛立像의 硏究-毘盧舍那丈六三尊佛像과 관련하여-", 美術資料, 29 (1981)
- 朴洪國, "掘佛寺址四面石佛의造成時期", 신라학연구, 5 (2001)
- 베네딕트앤더슨, "상상의 공동체" (1992), 나남
- 佐藤道信, "근대 일본미술사의 형성과 그 연구 동향", 미술사논단, 10 (2000)
- 신숙정, "우리나라 신석기 문화 연구 경향-1945년까지", 한국상고사학보 (1993)
- 李成市, "黑板勝美를 통해 본 식민지와 역사학", 한국문화, 23 (1999)
- 이순자, "일제 강점기 고적 조사 사업 연구" (2009), 경인문화사
- 이지원, "1930년대 民族主義系列의 古蹟保存運動", 東方學志, 77 (1993)
- 이지원, "1920~30년대 日帝의 朝鮮文化 支配 政策", 歷史敎育, 75 (2000)
- 정인성, "일제강점기 ‘慶州古蹟保存會’와 모로가 히데오(諸鹿央雄)", 대구사학, 95, pp.1~39 (2009), 대구사학회
- 최남주선생탄생100주년기념사업회, "石堂崔南柱先生", 석당최남주선생100주년기념자료집, ~ (2005)
- 최석영, "한국 박물관의 근대적 유산" (2001), 서경
- 홍선표, "한국미술사 인식틀의 비판과 새로운 모색", 미술사논단, 9 (2000)
- 홍선표, "한국회화사' 재구축의 과제근대적 학문의 틀을 넘어서", 미술사학연구, 241(241), pp.105~125 (2004), 한국미술사학회
- 黃壽永, "黃壽永全集2: 한국의 불상(하)" (1998), 혜안
- 韓國慶州における新羅時代の遺蹟, 東洋協會調査部學術報告, "關野貞", 東洋協會, ~ (1909)
- 關野貞, "朝鮮藝術之硏究", ~ (1910)
- 關野貞, "韓國藝術の變遷について" (1910), 韓紅葉
- 高木博志, "近代天皇制の文化史的硏究" (1995), 校倉書房
- 大坂金太郞, "趣味の慶州" (1931), 慶州古蹟保存會
- 藤田亮策, "朝鮮に於げる古蹟の調査及び保存の沿革", 朝鮮, ~ (1931)
- 瀨繁明, "明治期における〈文化財〉保護政策と關野貞-美術史から考古學へ展開", 日本における美術史學の成立と展開 (2001), 東京國立文化財硏究所
- 朝鮮總督府, "慶州南山の佛蹟", 朝鮮寶物古蹟圖錄2 (1940), 朝鮮總督府
- 佐藤道信, "明治國家と近代美術" (1999), 吉川弘文館
- 中村亮平, "朝鮮慶州之美術" (1929), 藝術堂
- 靑井哲人, "法隆寺と世界建築史", 日本における美術史學の成立と展開 (2001), 東京國立文化財硏究所
