북방 다문천의 보탑 도상 해석- 도상 형성 원인과 원·고려 이전의 양상 -
Analysis of Stupa Icons of Vaiśravaṇa –The causes of icon development and patterns before the Yuan and Koryo Dynasties–
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
사천왕상 중 북방 다문천이 어떤 연유로 보탑을 받들게 되었는지, 그리고 그 보탑은 동시대 실제 불탑과 특징이 일치하는지에 관해 의문을 가진다. 이 글에서는 북방 다문천을 그들의 수호신으로 삼고 있는 중앙아시아의 호탄에서 이러한 도상이 처음 형성되었을 것이라고 보고, 호탄국의 문헌사료와 회화에 주목한다. 아울러 사천왕상 보탑(寶塔)의 변화양상과 불탑(佛塔)의 상관관계를 중국 남북조시대와 통일신라의 북방 다문천을 중심으로 살펴본다.
Abstract
When we see the statues of the Four Heavenly Kings, we look for the statue hold a stupa in its hand. Then, without hesitation, we regard the statue with a stupa as Vai´sravana. However, the earliest sutra stating that the statue holding a stupa is Vai´sravana is Tuoluonijijing (Dharani’s collections of sutra) translated into Chinese in 653. For this reason, it is generally believed that the configuration of Vai´sravana into a statue with a stupa in its hand was based on Tuoluonijijing. However, this view is questionable because there were a large number of Vai´sravana statues holding a stupa before the translation of Tuoluonijijing into Chinese in 653 and that in comparison with extant statues of the Four Heavenly Kings, there are few agreements with the contents of Tuoluonijijing except the notion that ‘Vai´sravana holds a stupa.’Then, what is the origin of the formula Vai´sravana=stupa? This study was started from the question of through what process the concept Vai´sravana=stupa, which had never been mentioned in early Buddhist literature, was developed and settled as an icon of Buddhist art. As mentioned earlier, this formula was valid only until the Yuan and Koryo Dynasties. In order to find the answer to the question, the author paid attention to Khotan in Central Asia, which worships Vai´sravana as their ancestral god and guardian deity. Since early times, Khotan enshrined Vai´sravana as the guardian deity of the country. Vai´sravana appearing in the history books of Khotan did numerous works for the kingdom of Khotan. When Khotan was submerged, Vai´sravana brought the land out of water, and it also protected the precious stupa that had risen out of the ground. In our estimation, for these reasons, Khotan might have created a large number of Vai´sravana statues holding a stupa and established the icon Vai´sravana=stupa in Central Asia. Another question is whether the stupa held by Vai´sravana is the same as an actual Buddhist stupa in form. The stupa of Vai´sravana is a single‐story pagoda of unique shape in which a single‐story body is placed on overturned lotus and is topped with multiple‐layered umbrella. What is notable is that the body is single‐story and an arch‐type niche is made on each of the four sides. This type of stupa originated from the Central Asian region and was popular during the period of the Northern and Southern Dynasties in China. The stupa held by Vai´sravana statues in Central Asia and East Asia maintained its basic single‐story shape for a long period, and as a result, stupas in Vai´sravana were often different from actual Buddhist pagodas in the same period. The appearance of the Four Heavenly Kings statues like their face and armor changed from age to age but, interestingly, the shape of stupa was conservative, changing more slowly than real Buddhist pagodas. In Buddhist art, ‘icon’ is understood as ‘the expression of contents or teachings in sutras using visual images.’ Because the meaning of an icon expressed in image can be grasped properly only based on the knowledge of the contents and belief of Buddhist scripture, the correct understanding of sutras has been regarded as essential for Buddhist art research. However, we should not overlook the extremely common‐sense fact that ‘icons’ depicted in sutras have to be created by someone, and the icon Vai´sravana=stupa is a representative example showing the process clearly.
참고문헌 (69)
- "金剛頂瑜伽護摩儀軌", ~
- "金光明經", ~
- "大唐西域記", ~
- "大樓炭經", ~
- "大方等大集經", ~
- "蓮華面經", ~
- "續高僧傳", ~
- "十二天供儀軌", ~
- "阿育王經", ~
- "阿薄俱元帥大將上佛陀羅尼經修行儀軌", ~
- "集神州三寶感通錄", ~
- "千手觀音造次第法儀軌", ~
- "陀羅尼集經", ~
- 賈應逸, "于불교도상의地神", 중앙아시아의역사와문화, ~ (2007)
- 국립문화재연구소, "경주나원리오층석탑사리장엄", ~ (1998)
- 김상현, "7세기 후반 신라불교의 정법치국론", 신라문화, (30), pp.91~115 (2007), 신라문화연구소
- 김선경, "말법시대(末法時代)의 석굴: 영유(靈裕)와 대주성굴(大住聖窟)", 미술사와 시각문화, (5), pp.250~285 (2006), 미술사와 시각문화학회
- 남동신, "新羅中古期佛敎治國策과皇龍寺", 新羅文化祭學術發表會論文集, 22 (2001)
- 황룡사 유적발굴조사보고서I, "문화재연구소", 문화재관리국, ~ (1984)
- 박은경, "사천왕상 배치형식의 변화 원리와 조선시대 사천왕 명칭", 美術史論壇, (30), pp.271~300 (2010), 한국미술연구소
- 소현숙, "法隆寺 獻納寶物 甲寅銘金銅光背 硏究 -장엄의장을 통한 연원과 제작국 고증-", 한국고대사연구, (54), pp.503~550 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 소현숙, "북향당 석굴 북동의 전륜성왕 상징", 미술사학연구, 255(255), pp.167~196 (2007), 한국미술사학회[DOI]
- 이주형, "발우(鉢盂)의 유전(流轉) ― 인도 불교미술의 불발(佛鉢) 경배 ―", 중앙아시아연구, 12, pp.97~128 (2007), 중앙아시아학회
- 임영애, "송광사 사천왕상 - 발굴자료의 종합적 연구" (2006), 아세아문화사
- 임영애, "무장형사천왕상의연원再考-간다라및서역을중심으로-", 강좌미술사, 11 (1998)
- 임영애, "조선시대 사천왕상 존명의 변화", 미술사학연구, 265(265), pp.73~104 (2010), 한국미술사학회
- 주경미, "묵서지편의 석탑부재 및 사리장엄 관련 용어" (2009), (재)불교문화재연구소
- 주경미, "중국의 아육왕탑 전승 연구", 동양고전연구, (28), pp.369~408 (2007), 동양고전학회
- 주경미, "탑형 사리장엄구 - 건축 이미지의 공예적 변용", 미술사와 시각문화, (5), pp.224~249 (2006), 미술사와 시각문화학회
- 주경미, "중국 고대 불사리장엄 연구" (2003), 일지사
- 官大中, "龍門石窟藝術" (2002), 人民出版社
- 李擧網, "隋神德寺遺址出土舍利石函上的天王圖像", 陝西歷史博物館官刊, 12 (2005)
- 村田治郞, "支那の佛塔" (1940), 富山房
- 玄奘著, "大唐西域記校注", 中外交通史籍叢刊 (1990), 中華書局
- 岡田健, "東寺毘沙門天像-羅城門安置說と造立年代に關する考察", 美術硏究, 371 (1999)
- 橋本凝胤, "佛敎敎理上より見たる四天王の一考察", 夢殿, 16 (1936)
- 宮治昭, "兜跋毘沙門天の成立をめぐつて-對立と交流んにいよる圖像の成立", 國際交流美術史硏究會第10回シンボジウム (1991)
- 宮治昭, "インドの四天王と毘沙門天", 日本の美術, 8(315) (1992), 毘沙門天像
- 宮治昭, "佛像學入門" (2004), 春秋社
- 金岡秀友, "金光明經の硏究" (1980), 大東出版社
- 大橋一章, "法隆寺美術論爭の視點" (1998), グラフ社
- 臺信祐爾, "敦煌の四天王像", 東京國立博物館紀要, 27 (1991)
- 瀧精一, "燉煌出唐畵毘沙門天圖に就いて", 國華, 33(389) (1922)
- 賴富本宏, "密敎佛の硏究" (1990), 法藏館
- 北進一, "毘沙門天像の變遷 In 世界美術全集東洋編15 中央アジア" (2002), 小學館
- 寺本婉雅, "于國佛敎史の硏究" (1974), 國書刊行會
- 山崎元一, "于建國傳說の一考察", 山本博士還曆記念論文集 (1972), 山川出版社
- 松本榮一, "兜跋毘沙門天圖", 敦煌畵の硏究 (1939), 東方文化學院東京硏究所
- 松本榮一, "兜跋毘沙門天像の起源", 國華, 40, pp.482~ (1930)
- 松浦正昭, "毘沙門天の起源とその佛敎的受容", 日本の美術, 8(315) (1992), 毘沙門天像
- 神田雅章, "城門樓上の毗沙門天について", 美術史學, 16 (1994)
- 岩田茂樹, "法隆寺金堂四天王像の諸問題 In 國寶法隆寺金堂展" (2008), 朝日新聞社
- 熊谷宣夫, "中央アジア壁畵毘沙門天像", 大和文華, 19 (1956)
- 源豊宗, "兜跋毘沙門天像の起源", 佛敎美術, 15 (1930)
- 陸載和, "感恩寺址東·西三層石塔出土舍利容器における四天王像に關する一試論", 박사, pp.2008
- 田邊勝美, "毘沙門天の源流" (2006), 山喜房佛書林
- 町田甲一, "法隆寺の夢殿本尊求世觀音立像と金堂四天王像について", 上代彫刻史の硏究 (1977), 吉川弘文館
- 佐佐木剛三, "兜跋毘沙門天像についての一考察", 美術史, 38(10) (1960)
- 淸水紀枝, "『感通錄』に見える中國の阿育王塔と舍利の關係", 奈良美術硏究, 7 (2008)
- 村田治郞, "中華における阿育王塔の成立", 事迹と美術, 390 (1968)
- "四天王像", 日本の美術, 5 (1986)
- Stein, Aurel, "Ancient Khotan : Detailed Report of Archaeological Explorations in Chinese Turkestan" (1907), Clarendon Press
- Baumer,Christoph, "Dandan Oilik Revisited : New findings a Century Later", Oriental Art, 45(2) (1999)
- Williams, Joanna, "The Iconography of Khotanese Paintings", East & West, 23 (1973)
- Brough, John, "Legend of Khotan and Nepal", BSOAS, 12(2) (1948)
- Tsiang, Katherine R, "Miraculous Flying Stupas in Qingzhou Sculpture", Orientations, 11 (2000)
- Granoff, P, "Tobatsu Bishamon : Three Japanese statues in the United States and an Outlines of the Rise of This Gult in East Asia", East & West, 20(1) (1970)
- WW Rockhill, "The Life of the Buddha and the Early History of His Order" (1982), Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.
- Yamazaki Gen’ichi, "The Legend of the Foundation of Khotan", The Memoirs of the Toyo Bunko, 48 (1990)
