교원능력개발평가의 운영타당도, 결과만족도, 피드백수용도 및 교사자기개발동기 간의 관계
The Relationship among the Operation Validity, Result Satisfaction, Feedback Acceptance and Teacher Self-development Motivation
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 중학교 교사 교원능력개발평가 운영타당도, 결과만족도, 피드백수용도, 교사자기개발동기 간의 관계를 알아보는 데 목적이 있다. 이 연구를 위하여 서울, 인천, 경기도에 소재한 중학교 교사들을 대상으로 하여 총 81개 학교에 1,200부의 설문조사를 시행하였으며, 중다회귀분석과 구조방정식모형분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 교원능력개발평가의 운영타당도, 결과만족도가 교사자기개발동기에 미치는 영향관계에서 피드백수용도가 매개 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 교원능력개발평가의 결과만족도가 피드백수용도에 미치는 영향, 피드백수용도가 교사자기개발동기에 미치는 영향 및 운영타당도가 피드백수용도에 미치는 영향이 다른 잠재변수들 간의 인과관계에 비해 상대적으로 크며, 통계적 유의수준 하에서 의미가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 운영타당도, 결과만족도, 피드백수용도, 교사자기개발동기간의 직·간접적 효과를 분석한 결과 운영타당도와 결과만족도가 피드백수용도를 통해 교사자기개발동기에 미치는 간접효과 있는 것으로 파악되었다. 운영타당도, 결과만족도가 교사자기개발동기에 직접적으로 미치는 효과보다 피드백수용도를 통해 간접적으로 미치는 효과가 유의한 것으로 보아 피드백수용도가 교사자기개발동기를 설명하는 중요한 매개변인 이라는 것으로 해석할 수 있다.
Abstract
This study aimed to find out the relationship of the operation validity, the result satisfaction, the feedback acceptance, and the teacher's self-development motive on middle school teachers' Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development(hereafter TEPD). To achieve these goals, research questions such as the following were set. The results of study through these procedures are summarized as follows: First, judging from analyzed results about parameter roles of feedback acceptance level in the effect relationship of the TEPD's management validity and result satisfaction level on the teacher's self-development motive, the feedback acceptance level could play parameter roles in it. Second, through the analysis of structure relationships among the management validity, the result satisfaction, the feedback acceptance, and the teacher's self-development motive in the TEPD, the effect that the TEPD's result satisfaction had on middle school teachers' feedback acceptance, the effect that the feedback acceptance had on the teacher's self-development motive, and the effect that the TEPD's management validity had the feedback acceptance were relatively greater, compared with the cause-and-effect relationship among other latent variables, which can be interpreted that there was a meaning under statistical significance level. Third, looking results of direct or indirect effects among the TEPD's management validity, the TEPD's result satisfaction, the feedback acceptance, and the teacher's self-development motive, it was grasped that they had an indirect effect on the teacher's self-development motive through the management validity and the result satisfaction. To sum it up, it could be identified that the feedback acceptance was an important parameter variable which could have an effect on the teacher's self-development motive and examining the ways to reinforce the feedback acceptance, there were the active participation in school's decision-making, the accurate understanding on the TEPD, the production of reliable results by the continuous education for students and parents.
참고문헌 (50)
- 고수일, "피드백수용도의결정요인", 인적자원개발연구, 6(2), pp.21~44 (2004)
- 高在天, "학교중심 교사연수 프로그램의 평가 준거 설정 연구", 박사, 초등교육, pp.1997
- 교육과학기술부, "교원능력개발평가 매뉴얼", ~ (2012)
- 김갑성, "교원 다면평가의 효과성 검토 - 교원능력개발평가를 중심으로", 한국교육개발원, 5(1), pp.25~28 (2008)
- 김성희, "초등학교 조직풍토와 교사 자기개발 욕구에 관한 연구", 석사, 초등교육행정, pp.2003
- 김영철, "교원 다면평가제도의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구", 석사, 정책학, pp.2006
- 김정진, "다면평가 특성에 따른 평가결과 수용도 결정요인과 결과", 대한경영학회지, 21(1), pp.391~416 (2008), 대한경영학회
- 박원우, "관리자 능력에 대한 본인, 상사, 부하평가의 특성과 그들 간의 관계 : 다면평가의 효과적 실시를 위한 기초적 실증연구", 인사조직 연구, 8(1), pp.51~104 (2000)
- 양승삼, "교원능력개발평가 정책형성과정에서 나타난 갈등연구", 박사, 교육행정, pp.2009
- 이덕로, "인사고과의 특성이 피고과자의 고과결과 수용에 미치는 영향", 경영학연구, 29(1), pp.245~270 (2000)
- 이병환, "교사 다면평가제 적용 방안 탐색", 교육행정학연구, 22(2), pp.163~186 (2004), 한국교육행정학회
- 이상희, "다면평가제도의 효과성에 관한 연구", 석사, 경영학, pp.2001
- 이윤식, "학교경영과 자율장학" (2004), 교육과학사
- 전제상, "다원적 교원평가제의 일원화 가능성 및 방안 탐색", 한국교원교육연구, 26(2), pp.387~410 (2009), 한국교원교육학회
- 조하나, "교원능력개발평가와 초등교사의 교직 전문성간의 관계 연구", 석사, 교육행정및고등교육, pp.2010
- 홍성철, "다면평가제도의 수용성 및 효과성에 관한 연구 : 육군 장교의 인식을 중심으로", 석사, 행정학, pp.2005
- 홍종성, "다면평가시스템의 특성 및 목적에 대한 인식이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 박사, 인사·조직·전략, pp.2004
- 황요성, "다면평가제도의 개인수용성 결정요인과 개선효과에 관한 연구", 박사, 인사조직, pp.2007
- Atwater, L. E., "An upward feedback field experiment", Personnel and Human Decision Process, 50, pp.179~211 (2000)
- Atwater, L. E., "Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback", Human Resource Management, 41(2), pp.193~208 (2002)
- Austin, W., "Moral evaluation in intimate relationships, In Equity and justice in social behavior", pp.217~260 (1982)
- Baker, T. B., "Towards a model of the new employment relationship Aligning the needs of individual and organization", Leadership andOrganization Development Journal, 30(3), pp.197~223 (2009)
- Bailey, C., "360 degree feedback and developmental outcomes: The role of feedback characteristics, self-efficacy and importance of feedback dimensions to focal managers’ current role", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(1), pp.51~66 (2006)
- Boswell, W. R., "Superating the developmental and evaluative performance appraisal uses", Journal of Business Psychology, 16(3), pp.391~409 (2000)
- Rater selection in multi-source assessment: Evidence for the use of different strategies, "Brutus, S.", Molson School of Business, Concordia University, ~ (2002)
- Deci, E. L., "Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior" (1985), Plenum
- Dipboye, R. L., "Correlates of employee reaction to performance appraisal systems", Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), pp.248~251 (1981)
- Dobbins, G. H., "A contingency approach to appraisal satisfaction : An initial investigation of the joint effects of organizational variables and appraisal characteristics", Journal of management, 16(3), pp.619~632 (1990)
- Eisenberger, R., "Perceived organizational support", Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), pp.500~507 (1986)
- Facteau, C. L., "Manager’s behavioral responses to subordinate appraisal feedback: Predictors and outcomes", 박사, pp.1996
- Facteau, C. L., "Reactions of leaders to 360-degree feedback from subordinates and peers", Leadership Quarterly, 9(4), pp.427~448 (1998)
- Facteau, C., "Reactions of leaders to 360 degree feedback from subordinates and peers", Leadership Quarterly, 4, pp.427~448 (1998)
- Fulk, J., "Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations", Journal of Business Research, 13(4), pp.301~313 (1985)
- Good, J. S., "Feedback specificity, exploration, and learning", Journal of appled Psychology, 89, pp.248~264 (2004)
- Goodman, J. S., "Feedback specificity. exploration, and learning", Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, pp.248~262 (2004)
- Hedge, J. W., "Exploring the concept of acceptability as a criterion for evaluating performance measures", Group & Organization Management, 25(1), pp.22~44 (2000)
- Holt, K., "Managersdevelopment responses to 360-degree feedback", Paper Presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1996)
- Judge, T. A., "Social context of performance evaluation decisions", Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), pp.80~105 (1993)
- Kluger, A. N., "The effects of feedback interventions on performance : A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory", Psychological Bulletin, 119, pp.254~284 (1996)
- Levy, P. E., "The role of perceived system knowledge inpredicting appraisal reactions, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(1), pp.53~65 (1998)
- London, M., "Empowered self-development and continuous learning", Human Resource Management, 38(1), pp.3~15 (1999)
- Maurer, T. J., "Predictors of attitude toward a 360 degree feedback system and involvement in post feedback management development activity", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, pp.87~107 (2002)
- Podsakoff, P. M., "Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 44, pp.45~67 (1989)
- Roberson, Q. M., "Understanding the motivational effects of procedural and informational justice in feedback process", The British Journal of Psychology, 97, pp.281~298 (2006)
- Roberts, G. E., "Maximizing performance appraisal system acceptance : Perspectives from municipal government personnel administrators", Public Personnel Management, 23(4), pp.525~549 (1994)
- Smither, J. W., "Does performance improve following multisource feedback : A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings", Personne Psychology, 58, pp.33~66 (2005)
- Tornow, W. W., "Perceptions or reality: Is multiple-perspective measurement a means or an end?", Human Resource Management, 32(Summer) (1993)
- Walker, A. G., "A five-year study of upward feedback : What managers do with their results matters", Personnel Psychology, 52, pp.393~423 (1999)
- Westerman, J. W., "Reducing the threat of rater nonparticipation in 360-degree feedback systems : An exploratory examination of antecedents, to participation in upward ratings", Group & Organization Management, 22(2), pp.288~309 (1997)
- Yammarino, F. J., "Do managers see themselves as others see them? Implications of self-other rating agreement for human resource management", Organizational Dynamics, 32(2), pp.231~247 (1997)