본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부산항의 환적화물 유치전략에 관한 연구

A Study on Strategic Plan for Attracting Transshipment Cargo of Busan Port from Global Carriers' Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

부산항의 경쟁항만으로 부상하고 있는 북중국 항만, 즉 상하이(上海), 닝보(寧波), 칭다오(靑島), 텐진(天津)은 물론 다렌(大連)의 대대적인 항만 개발로 인해 이들 항만에 직기항하는 선박의 수도 늘어나고, 이들 항만에서 환적하는 중국내 화물이 증가함에 따라 상대적으로 부산항의 환적물량은 감소하는 현상이 나타나고 있다. 따라서 부산항을 동북아 환적 거점항으로 활용하여 지속적인 환적물량증대를 보이고 있는 ‘A’ 외국적 선사의 실제 사례를 통하여 부산항 환적거점화 전략을 제시하고, 글로벌 대형선사들의 환적 거점항 선정요인을 도출하여 이 요인들이 실제 부산항의 환적물량 증대에 기여여부를 분석하여 환적 화물 증대방안을 제시하고자 하였다.

Abstract

Today, the shipping and port industries have been undergoing difficult situations due to an unprecedented global economic recession since late 2008 and it is, unfortunately, not easy to predict when the industry can get out of the situations. In the meantime, decreased trade volume have been forcing the shipping carriers and major ports to get into tougher competition for survival. Busan Port, therefore, needs to develop a new strategy from a different angle to become a preferred transshipment hub for sustainable growth. As proved by many preceding studies, general competitiveness (hardware aspects) of Busan Port is somewhat similar to those ports in North China in terms of competitive factors except for import/export volume and transshipment cost, which means it can hardly differentiate itself from North China competitors in terms of terminal operational aspects. This study would derive new competitive factors through the case study on a global carrier ‘A’ who shows constant growth in transshipment via Busan Port. The results of the study are summarized as below. it is highlighted that the role and function of the local branch offices or agents of global carriers for the handling of transshipment cargo draw our attention. Basically the selection of transshipment hub ports is made based on each carriers fleet operating strategy and cost management strategy, however, growth of transshipment volume can be greatly influenced by each carrier's branch office or agent in Korea as the volume would be a sort of indicator for the transshipment performance which depends on how the local branch office or agent treats the transshipment as a process owner, i.e. it may closely relate to their will to induce the transshipment cargo to Busan Port.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 부산 북항과 신항의 연계활성화 방안 연구, "김형태", 한국해양수산개발원, 89~93 (2005)
  2. 박영태, "우리나라 환적컨테이너화물 유치전략에 관한 연구", 물류학회지, 13(1), pp.95~121 (2003), 한국물류학회
  3. 백인흠, "ISM&AHP를 이용한 환적항만의 선정", 해운물류연구, (53), pp.43~64 (2007), 한국해운물류학회
  4. 부산항 환적체계 개선방안 연구, "최재선", 한국해양수산개발원, ~ (2006)
  5. 한철환, "정기선 선사의 기항지 선택에 관한 실증연구", 경제학공동학술대회 발표논문집, pp.1~14 (2005), 한국항만경제학회
  6. 북중국 항만 발전이 우리나라 환적화물 유치에 미치는 영향, "한철환", 한국해양수산개발원, 119~128 (2004)
  7. Aiken, L. S., "Multiple Regression: Testing andinterpreting interactions" (1991), Sage
  8. Bart W. Wiegmans, "Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators", Maritime Policy & Management, 35(6), pp.517~534 (2008)
  9. Kim, Yul-Seong, "Review of Theoretical Aspects on the Studies of Port Selection Criteria", Journal of Navigation and Port Research International Edition, 32(4), pp.135~141 (2009)
  10. Development and Improvement of Ports : The establishment of Transshipment Facilities in Developing Countries, "UNCTAD", 7~8 (1990)
  11. Willingale M.C., "The Port Routing Behavior of Short Sea Ship Operator : Theory and Practices", Maritime Policy and Management, 8(2), pp.109~120 (1981)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)