본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Choice Factors of Transshipment Port in Northeast Asia

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류해상운송학

초록

In order to attract more transshipment cargoes, Busan Port Authority (BPA) has, since 2003, adopted the volume incentive policy by which more than US$ 10 million annually have been paid back to shipping lines that were called at the port. However, having been a transshipment port for the Northeast region of China, the port of Busan has come under threat from bold Chinese port development projects, notably Shanghai, as northern Chinese regional ports place more emphasis on building facilities capable of handling growing trade volumes. Undoubtedly this would lead to a decline in transshipment container traffic moved via Busan. The purpose of this paper is to identify some core factors that have been affecting the increase of transshipment cargoes of Busan and further to recommend BPA an improved incentive scheme with which more T/S cargoes can be attracted into the port of Busan. To clarity the reason why T/S cargoes have increased in the port of Busan, several steps are made as follows: The first step is to make a quantitative model for explaining the development of T/S cargoes during the last decade. The second step is to define the dependent and the independent variables for multiple regressions after testing variable significance. For this, data collection and the accuracy of validation have been done by the direct interview with the experienced staffs in shipping companies of both domestic and foreign country. After validating the model with collected data, the final step is to find variables which are explaining the model mostly. In conclusion, 2 variables were clearly identified as core factors that explain well the development of T/S cargoes in the port of Busan: ‘Mohring effect’ and total cost. It is strongly recommended, by an empirical study, that an incentive scheme be changed to a way which more feeder vessels rather than mother vessels can reduce their direct costs to call in the port of Busan.

Abstract

In order to attract more transshipment cargoes, Busan Port Authority (BPA) has, since 2003, adopted the volume incentive policy by which more than US$ 10 million annually have been paid back to shipping lines that were called at the port. However, having been a transshipment port for the Northeast region of China, the port of Busan has come under threat from bold Chinese port development projects, notably Shanghai, as northern Chinese regional ports place more emphasis on building facilities capable of handling growing trade volumes. Undoubtedly this would lead to a decline in transshipment container traffic moved via Busan. The purpose of this paper is to identify some core factors that have been affecting the increase of transshipment cargoes of Busan and further to recommend BPA an improved incentive scheme with which more T/S cargoes can be attracted into the port of Busan. To clarity the reason why T/S cargoes have increased in the port of Busan, several steps are made as follows: The first step is to make a quantitative model for explaining the development of T/S cargoes during the last decade. The second step is to define the dependent and the independent variables for multiple regressions after testing variable significance. For this, data collection and the accuracy of validation have been done by the direct interview with the experienced staffs in shipping companies of both domestic and foreign country. After validating the model with collected data, the final step is to find variables which are explaining the model mostly. In conclusion, 2 variables were clearly identified as core factors that explain well the development of T/S cargoes in the port of Busan: ‘Mohring effect’ and total cost. It is strongly recommended, by an empirical study, that an incentive scheme be changed to a way which more feeder vessels rather than mother vessels can reduce their direct costs to call in the port of Busan.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Bae,Byungtae, "The Devices to Increase Transshipment Cargoes of the Port of Pusan", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 15, pp.179~208 (1999)
  2. Containerisation International, "Year Book 2007", ~ (2007)
  3. Drewry, "Ship Operation Costs Annual Review and Forecast", ~ (2005)
  4. Drewry, "Annual Container Market Review and Forecast 2006", 2007, 2006
  5. Hiroshi Ohashia, "Choice of air cargo transshipment airport: an application to air cargo traffic to", from Northeast Asia, 2005, pp.11, ~
  6. 백인흠, "ISM&AHP를 이용한 환적항만의 선정", 해운물류연구, 54(53), pp.43~64 (2007), 한국해운물류학회
  7. 정태원, "우리나라 항만의 대중국 환적화물 유치방안에 관한 연구", 대한교통학회지, 20(2), pp.7~16 (2002), 대한교통학회
  8. Lirn, T. C, "Transshipment Port Selection and Decision-making Behavior: Analysing the Taiwanese Case", International Journal of Logistics: Research and Application, 6(4), pp.229~244 (2003)
  9. Lirn, T. C, "An Application of AHP on Transshipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(1), pp.70~91 (2004)
  10. Mohring,H, "Optimization and Scale Economies in Urban Bus Transportation", American Economic Review, pp.591~604 (1972)
  11. Ng,K.Y.A, "Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transshipment Market: An Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8, pp.234~250 (2006)
  12. Ocean Shipping Consultants, "Container Port Strategy, Emerging issues", ~ (2007)
  13. Ocean Shipping Consultants, "Marketing of Container Terminals, 2004", ~ (2007)
  14. 박병인, "컨테이너항만의 환적항 결정요인 분석", 한국항만경제학회지, 24(1), pp.41~60 (2008), 한국항만경제학회
  15. 박영태, "우리나라 환적컨테이너화물 유치전략에 관한 연구", 물류학회지, 13(1), pp.95~121 (2003), 한국물류학회
  16. Van Reeven, Peran, "Subsidisation of Urban Public Transport and the Mohring Effect", Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 42(2) (2008)
  17. Veldman S, "A Model on Container Port Competition, An application for the West European Container Hub-ports", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5(2) (2003)
  18. Veldman S, "River Depth and Container Port Market Shares: The Impact of Deepening the Scheldt River on the West European Container Hub-Port. Market Shares", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 7(4) (2005)
  19. Veldman, S, "A model of container port competition: an application for the transshipment market of the Mediterranea", IAME Conference Athens 2007 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)