본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공급사슬 네트워크 진화 과정과 참여자들의 행동적 편향이 공급사슬 구조와 성과에 미치는 영향

The Impact of Supply Chain Network Evolution and Behavioral Biases of Participants on Supply Chain Structure and Performance

서용원|김정연
한국로지스틱스학회 (Korea Logistics Society)|2024.06|로지스틱스연구 (Korean Journal of Logistics)|제32권 제3호|pp. 75-85|DOI 10.15735/kls.2024.32.3.006

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

behavioral biasessupply chain performancesupply chain network evolutionGeneralized Preferential Attachment (GPA)network Structure and performancecollaborative tendencie
주제분류경영학

초록

This study examines the impact of supply chain network evolution and participants’ behavioral biases on network structure and performance. We simulate supply chain network formation using the Generalized Preferential Attachment(GPA) model, focusing on trading partner preferences. Decision-making models that consider multiple trading partners and participants’ behavioral biases towards cooperation are developed and integrated into a simulation framework. Results show that preferential attachment to highly connected firms leads to more centralized and shorter networks, resulting in decreased overall performance and imbalanced profit distribution. In addition, cooperative tendencies can improve supply chain outcomes, emphasizing the importance of fostering collaborative behavior and trust among participants to enhance supply chain performance.

Abstract

This study examines the impact of supply chain network evolution and participants’ behavioral biases on network structure and performance. We simulate supply chain network formation using the Generalized Preferential Attachment(GPA) model, focusing on trading partner preferences. Decision-making models that consider multiple trading partners and participants’ behavioral biases towards cooperation are developed and integrated into a simulation framework. Results show that preferential attachment to highly connected firms leads to more centralized and shorter networks, resulting in decreased overall performance and imbalanced profit distribution. In addition, cooperative tendencies can improve supply chain outcomes, emphasizing the importance of fostering collaborative behavior and trust among participants to enhance supply chain performance.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 김승범, "용량 할당 의사결정에서 발생하는행동적 편향에 관한 실험적인 연구", 로지스틱스연구, 29(2), pp.57~64 (2022)
  2. 김정연, "다계층 공급사슬 네트워크에서 영향력의 차이를 고려한 공급사슬 조정 방안에 관한 연구", 한국SCM학회지, 24(1), pp.77~86 (2024)
  3. d김종대, "공급사슬의 진화 과정과 기업 범위 결정 요인에 관한 연구", 로지스틱스연구, 14(2), pp.1~21 (2006)
  4. 박시영, "영향력의 차이가 존재하는3자간 공급사슬 거래게임에서 의사결정 편향에 관한 연구", 한국SCM학회지, 23(2), pp.61~72 (2023)
  5. 이정민, "소매상의 비합리성을 고려한 공급사슬의 수익 공유 계약 설계에 대한 연구", 한국경영과학회지, 41(2), pp.101~127 (2016)
  6. 서용원, "공급사슬 네트워크에서 협상력을고려한 의사결정 조정 방안에 관한 연구", 한국경영과학회지, 45(1), pp.1~15 (2020)
  7. 장몽접, "서비스 공급사슬에서 공급자의 비합리성을 고려한 소매상의 의사결정과 공급사슬 성과에 관한 연구", 한국생산관리학회지, 27(2), pp.267~285 (2016)
  8. 정동진, "참여자의 기회주의 성향이공급사슬 풀링 효과에 미치는 영향", 로지스틱스연구, 28(2), pp.1~11 (2020)
  9. Basole, R. C., "Supply Network Structure, Visibility, and Risk Diffusion : A Computational Approach", Decision Sciences, 45(4), pp.753~789 (2014)
  10. Barabási, A. -L., "Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks", Science, 286(5439), pp.509~512 (1999)
  11. Becker-Peth, M., "Designing Buyback Contracts for Irrational but Predictable Newsvendors", Management Science, 59(8), pp.1800~1816 (2013)
  12. Bolton, G. E., "Managers and Students as Newsvendors", Management Science, 58(12), pp.2225~2233 (2012)
  13. Cachon, G. P., "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts : Strengths and Limitations", Management Science, 51(1), pp.30~44 (2005)
  14. Davis, A. M., "Multidimensional Bargaining and Inventory Risk in Supply Chains : An Experimental Study", Management Science, 65(3), pp.1286~1304 (2019)
  15. Davis, A. M., "Contracts and Capacity Investment in Supply Chains", Manufacturing &Service Operations Management, 20(3), pp.403~421 (2018)
  16. Dorogovtsev, S. N., "Structure of Growing Networks with Preferential Linking", Physical Review Letters, 85(21), pp.4633~4636 (2000)
  17. Erdos, P., "On Random Graphs. I", Publicationes Mathematicae, 6, pp.290~297 (1959)
  18. Fang, H., "Network Evolution Model for Supply Chain with Manufactures as the Core", PloS One, 13(1), pp.e0191180~ (2018)
  19. Hearnshaw, E. J. S., "A Complex Network Approach to Supply Chain Network Theory", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(4), pp.442~469 (2013)
  20. Ledwoch, A., "The Moderating Impact of Supply Network Topology on the Effectiveness of Risk Management", International Journal of Production Economics, 197, pp.13~26 (2018)
  21. Lee, Y. S., "Running behavioral operations experiments using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk", Production and Operations Management, 27(5), pp.973~989 (2018)
  22. Katok, E., "Contracting in Supply Chains : A Laboratory Investigation", Management Science, 55(12), pp.1953~1968 (2009)
  23. Kim, Y., "Supply Network Disruption and Resilience : A Network Structural Perspective", Journal of Operations Management, 33, pp.43~59 (2015)
  24. Krapivsky, P. L., "Connectivity of Growing Random Networks", Physical Review Letters, 85(21), pp.4629~4632 (2000)
  25. Nair, A., "Supply Network Topology and Robustness Against Disruptions : An Investigation Using Multi-Agent Model", International Journal of Production Research, 49(5), pp.1391~1404 (2011)
  26. Potter, A., "Exploring Supplier–Supplier Innovations Within the Toyota Supply Network: A Supply Network Perspective", Journal of Operations Management, 66(7–8), pp.797~819 (2020)
  27. Schweitzer, M. E., "Decision Bias in the Newsvendor Problem with a Known Demand Distribution : Experimental Evidence", Management Science, 46(3), pp.404~420 (2000)
  28. Shi, X., "Research on the Robustness of Interdependent Supply Networks with Tunable Parameters", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158, pp.107431~ (2021)
  29. Wang, J., "Risk Transmission in Complex Supply Chain Network with Multi-Drivers", Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 143 (2021)
  30. Wang, J., "A novel supply chain network evolving model under random and targeted disruptions", Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2023 (2023), Elsevier
  31. Watts, D. J., "Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks", Nature, 393(6684), pp.440~442 (1998)
  32. Wiedmer, R., "Structural Characteristics of Complex Supply Chain Networks", Journal of Business Logistics, 42(2), pp.264~290 (2021)
  33. Yoo, S. H., "Effect of Supply Chain Structure and Power Dynamics on R&D and Market Performances", Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(3), pp.487~504 (2017)
  34. Yue, X., "Topological Structure and COVID-19Related Risk Propagation in TFT-LCD Supply Networks", International Journal of Production Research, pp.1~21 (2022)
  35. Xiao, Z., "Using Modified Barabási and Albert Model to Study the Complex Logistic Network in Eco-Industrial Systems", International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), pp.295~304 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

공급네트워크 구조와 재고 비용 성과의 관계김성학, 박철순한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2017 · 제28권 제1호한국자동차산업 공급네트워크의 진화: SAOM(Stochastic Actor Oriented Model)을 통한 탐색적 연구강아롬, 박철순, 오중산한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2022 · 제33권 제4호네트워크 분석과 메타 분석을 통한 공급사슬통합 연구유승호, 정의범한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2020 · 제31권 제1호참여자의 기회주의 성향이 공급사슬 풀링 효과에 미치는문성암, 정동진, 최진우한국로지스틱스학회 · 로지스틱스연구2020 · 제28권 제2호공급사슬 네트워크에서 노드 수준 척도의 측정에 관한 연구박시영, 서용원한국디지털무역연구소 · 디지털무역리뷰2018 · 제16권 제1호소셜 및 베이지안 네트워크 관점의 공급망 리스크 분석김대수, 정의범한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2023 · 제34권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

컨베이어식 자동 적재 로봇의 의사결정 지원을 위한 3차원 적재 알고리즘 개발류영태, 이상덕, 송병덕pp. 1-17드론과 로봇을 이용한 배달에 대한 의견 분석: 외식업 점주 대상으로김우중, 허성호pp. 19-30코로나19 팬데믹 상황에서 공급망 데이터 분석이 공급망 회복에 미친 영향: Triple-A 역량의 매개효과를 중심으로성현정, 김석수pp. 31-45도심 내 유휴공간을 활용한 MFC 최적입지 분석: Brown-Gibson 모델의 적용조유진, 이승연, 남현정, 강지연pp. 47-62패널회귀분석을 활용한 항공화물의 가격 및 소득 탄력도 분석 연구노장승, 박용남, 박용화pp. 63-73
원문 보기