본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공군 군수조직의 관계적⋅과업환경적 요인이 조직 민첩성에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Relational and Task Environmental Factors of Air Force Logistics Organizations on Organizational Agility

백승령|이우창
한국로지스틱스학회 (Korea Logistics Society)|2024.12|로지스틱스연구 (Korean Journal of Logistics)|제32권 제6호|pp. 43-59|DOI 10.15735/kls.2024.32.6.004

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

CollaborationRelational CommitmentInformation SharingOrganizational AgilityFacilitating ConditionRelational Understanding
주제분류경영학

초록

The COVID-19 pandemic and global crises such as the Russia-Ukraine war have greatly increased supply chain risks. In these uncertain and volatile conditions, organizational agility has emerged as a critical capability for ensuring sustainability and competitiveness, as it allows organizations to respond swiftly and effectively to rapid environmental changes. While existing studies have primarily focused on the components of supply chain agility and the role of inter-organizational relationships, relatively little attention has been given to the impact of internal organizational factors. Addressing this gap, this study investigates how relational and task-environmental factors within the Air Force influence collaboration, utilizing the Resource-Based Theory (RBT) framework. A survey conducted with key logistics and transportation practitioners under the Air Force Logistics Command was analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that relational factors, such as relational commitment and relational understanding, and task-environmental factors, such as information sharing and facilitating conditions, positively impact collaboration among members. Furthermore, collaboration was found to have a significant and positive effect on organizational agility. These results suggest that improving internal relationships and task environments strengthens collaboration, ultimately enhancing agility. This contributes to greater stability and responsiveness in rapidly changing crisis situations. In conclusion, strategically reinforcing relational and task-environmental factors is essential for enhancing the Air Force supply chain’s collaborative capabilities and operational efficiency, improving its resilience and adaptability to global disruptions.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and global crises such as the Russia-Ukraine war have greatly increased supply chain risks. In these uncertain and volatile conditions, organizational agility has emerged as a critical capability for ensuring sustainability and competitiveness, as it allows organizations to respond swiftly and effectively to rapid environmental changes. While existing studies have primarily focused on the components of supply chain agility and the role of inter-organizational relationships, relatively little attention has been given to the impact of internal organizational factors. Addressing this gap, this study investigates how relational and task-environmental factors within the Air Force influence collaboration, utilizing the Resource-Based Theory (RBT) framework. A survey conducted with key logistics and transportation practitioners under the Air Force Logistics Command was analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that relational factors, such as relational commitment and relational understanding, and task-environmental factors, such as information sharing and facilitating conditions, positively impact collaboration among members. Furthermore, collaboration was found to have a significant and positive effect on organizational agility. These results suggest that improving internal relationships and task environments strengthens collaboration, ultimately enhancing agility. This contributes to greater stability and responsiveness in rapidly changing crisis situations. In conclusion, strategically reinforcing relational and task-environmental factors is essential for enhancing the Air Force supply chain’s collaborative capabilities and operational efficiency, improving its resilience and adaptability to global disruptions.

참고문헌 (73)

  1. 강현철, "구조방정식모형에서 적합도지수의 해석과모형적합 전략에 대한 논의", Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 15(2), pp.653~668 (2013)
  2. 권현복, "공급사슬 통합, 역량 및 성과간의 관계 : 목재산업을 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 23(2), pp.111~130 (2015)
  3. 김진완, "고객가치, 공급사슬통합 그리고 기업성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구", 정보시스템연구, 21(2), pp.27~44 (2012)
  4. 나진성, "메타분석 방법을 통한 공급사슬관리 통합과 민첩성간의 관계에 대한 고찰", 로지스틱스연구, 22(2), pp.65~79 (2014)
  5. 민순홍, "성공적인 공급망 관리를 위한 기업 내 기능부서 간 조정에 관한 이론 모형 개발", 로지스틱스 연구, pp.55~83 (2011)
  6. 박상규, "환경 불확실성, 정보공유와 협력적문제해결이 물류성과에 미치는 영향", 산업경제연구, 18(6), pp.2923~2946 (2005)
  7. 박지우, "자동차부품산업의 공급사슬 파트너십 요인이 SCM 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구 : 파트너십 행위요인을 매개로", 대한경영학회지, 34(5), pp.775~806 (2021)
  8. 박찬권, "반응적 공급사슬에서의 민첩성 역량 선행요인, 민첩성 역량, 공급사슬 성과 간의관계에 대한 연구 : 대구 경북지역의 전자 및 통신, 전기 산업을 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 25(4), pp.155~180 (2017)
  9. 신현지, "무용단체의 SNS 활용과 무용단 신뢰,관계몰입 및 충성도와의 구조적 관계", 박사, pp.2016
  10. 임경희, "협력적 문제해결력 증진을 위한 팀 기반소프트웨어 교육 모델 개발", 한국컴퓨터교육학회지, pp.65~76 (2023)
  11. 임동훈, "AMOS 24 구조방정식 모형" (2017), 자유아카데미
  12. 임현민, "제조기업의 공급망 민첩성의 선행요인에 대한 실증연구: 관계적 관점을 기반으로", 한국생산관리학회지, pp.369~397 (2022)
  13. 장활식, "조직간 관계특성이 공급사슬 민첩성에 미치는 영향에 관한연구: 공급업체 관점으로", 한국정보시스템학회, pp.187~214 (2012)
  14. 홍관수, "환경변화속도, 정보공유, 그리고협력이 공급사슬의 성과에 미치는 영향", 중소기업연구, 26(2), pp.77~100 (2004)
  15. Alicke, K., "How COVID-19 is reshaping supply chains" (2021), The Mckinsey & Company
  16. Anderson, J. C., "Structural equation modeling in practice : A review and recommended two-step approach", Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411~ (1988)
  17. Anderson, E., "The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels", Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), pp.18~34 (1992)
  18. Barnes, J., "The effect of individual, network, and collaborative competencies on the supply chain management system", International Journal of Production Economics, 140(2), pp.888~899 (2012)
  19. Barney, J., "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.99~120 (1991)
  20. Blome, C., "Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance : A dynamic capabilities perspective", International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), pp.1295~1318 (2013)
  21. Braunscheidel, M. J., "The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response", Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), pp.119~140 (2009)
  22. Chen, C. C., "Understanding antecedents of new product development speed : A meta-analysis", Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), pp.17~33 (2010)
  23. Choi, T. Y., "The impact of relational commitment on supply chain collaboration : A case of Korean manufacturing firms", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 56(3), pp.45~60 (2020)
  24. Christopher. M, "The Agile Supply Chain : Competing in Volatile Market", Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), pp.33~44 (2000)
  25. Christopher, M., "Logistics & supply chain management" (2016), Pearson UK
  26. Cross, R., "A bridge too far? How boundary spanning networks drive organizational change and effectiveness", Organizational Dynamics, 42(2), pp.81~91 (2013)
  27. DeChurch, L. A., "The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork : A meta-analysis", Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), pp.32~53 (2010)
  28. Doz, Y., "Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal", Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), pp.370~382 (2010)
  29. Dyer, J. H., "Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network : The Toyota case", Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), pp.345~367 (2000)
  30. Dyer. J., "The Relational View : Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(4), pp.660~679 (1998)
  31. Fornell, C., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  32. Gligor, D. M., "Antecedents and consequences of supply chain agility : establishing the link to firm performance", Journal of Business Logistics, 33(4), pp.295~308 (2012)
  33. Gulati, R., "Strategic networks", Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), pp.203~215 (2000)
  34. Gundlach, G. T., "The structure of commitment in exchange", Journal of Marketing, 59(1), pp.78~92 (1995)
  35. Gupta, R., "The role of information sharing in enhancing supply chain agility : A study in the context of emerging markets", Journal of Business Logistics, 43(4), pp.210~228 (2022)
  36. Hohenstein, N. O., "Supply chain risk management in the COVID-19 pandemic : strategies and empirical lessons for improving global logistics service providers’ performance", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(4), pp.1336~1365 (2022)
  37. Hu, L. T., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling : A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999)
  38. Huang, J., "Collaborative practices and supply chain resilience : The mediating role of cooperative orientation", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 27(1), pp.89~105 (2022)
  39. Ivanov, D., "A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic", International Journal of Production Research, 59(8), pp.2431~2442 (2021)
  40. Jeong, M., "Business-to-business social exchange relationship beyond trust and commitment", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 65, pp.115~124 (2017)
  41. Kim, M., "The role of agility in responding to uncertainty : A cognitive perspective", Advances in Production Engineering &Management, 17(1), pp.57~74 (2022)
  42. Kovach, J. V., "The influence of continuous improvement practices on learning : An empirical study", Quality Management Journal, 20(4), pp.6~20 (2013)
  43. Kumar, S., "Facilitating conditions for supply chain collaboration : Technological and cultural aspects", Journal of Operations Management, 68(2), pp.132~150 (2022)
  44. Lambert, D. M., "Issues in supply chain management", Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), pp.65~83 (2000)
  45. Lance, C. E., "The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria : What did they really say?", Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), pp.202~220 (2006)
  46. Lee, H. L., "The triple-A supply chain", Harvard Business Review, 82(10), pp.102~113 (2004)
  47. Lee, H. L., "Creating value through supply chain integration", California Management Review, 63(3), pp.24~50 (2021)
  48. Lee, G., "Toward agile : An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility", MIS Quarterly, 34(1), pp.87~114 (2010)
  49. Li, Z., "Enhancing supply chain agility through strategic relationship management", International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(1), pp.120~140 (2023)
  50. Lin, C. T., "Agility index in the supply chain", International Journal of production economics, 100(2), pp.285~299 (2006)
  51. Marshall, D., "The influence of supply chain management capabilities on supply chain resilience", International Journal of Production Economics, 171, pp.101~113 (2016)
  52. Mithas, S., "How information management capability influences firm performance", MIS Quarterly, 35(1), pp.237~256 (2011)
  53. Nahapiet, J., "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242~266 (1998)
  54. Narayanan, S., "Assessing the contingent effects of collaboration on agility performance in buyer–supplier relationships", Journal of Operations Management, 33, pp.140~154 (2015)
  55. Nonaka, I., "The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation" (1995), Oxford University Press
  56. Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric theory" (1978), McGraw-Hill
  57. O’brien, R. M., "A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors", Quality &Quantity, 41(5), pp.673~690 (2007)
  58. Oliver, R. K., "The roots of logistics", pp.183~194 (2012), Springer
  59. Park, Y., "Internal marketability, external marketability, and career resilience : The mediating role of learning agility", Sustainability, 14(24), pp.16447~ (2022)
  60. Pfeffer, J., "The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective" (1978), Harper & Row
  61. Poon, J. M., "Distributive justice, procedural justice, affective commitment, and turnover intention : a mediation–moderation framework 1", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), pp.1505~1532 (2012)
  62. Priem, R. L., "Is the resource-based"view"a useful perspective for strategic management research?", Academy of management review, 26(1), pp.22~40 (2001)
  63. Riley, J. M., "How internal integration, information sharing, and training affect supply chain risk management capabilities", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(10), pp.953~980 (2016)
  64. Saglam, Y. C., "The role of communication quality, relational commitment, and reciprocity in building supply chain resilience : A social exchange theory perspective", Transportation research part E : Logistics and Transportation review, 167, pp.102936~ (2022)
  65. Swafford, P. M., "The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm : Scale development and model testing", Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), pp.170~188 (2006)
  66. Tan, K., "The moderating role of environmental uncertainty on information sharing and supply chain agility", European Journal of Operational Research, 293(3), pp.1012~1026 (2021)
  67. Tarafdar, M., "Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance : Complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility", International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), pp.925~938 (2017)
  68. Teece, D. J., "Explicating dynamic capabilities : The nature and microfoundations of(sustainable)enterprise performance", Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), pp.1319~1350 (2007)
  69. Venkatesh, V., "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view", MIS quarterly, pp.425~478 (2003)
  70. Wieland, A., "The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(4), pp.300~320 (2013)
  71. Yang, Y., "Digital transformation in supply chain management : A review and future research directions", Journal of Business Research, 142, pp.312~324 (2022)
  72. Yu, W., "Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities in supply chain management : Impact on firm performance", International Journal of Production Economics, 218, pp.150~162 (2019)
  73. Yusuf, Y. Y., "Agile supply chain capabilities : Determinants of competitive objectives", European journal of operational research, 159(2), pp.379~392 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

제조기업의 공급망 민첩성의 선행요인에 대한 실증연구: 관계적 관점을 기반으로김효진, 민순홍, 임현민, 허대식한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2022 · 제33권 제2호동적역량 관점의 군수조직 디지털 전환 효과: 협업을 통한 군수 민첩성 제고백승령, 염성규한국로지스틱스학회 · 로지스틱스연구2025 · 제33권 제6호반응적 공급사슬에서의 민첩성 역량 선행요인, 민첩성 역량, 공급사슬 성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구 : 대구 경북지역의 전자 및 통신, 전기 산업을 중심으로김채복, 박성민, 박찬권한국로지스틱스학회 · 로지스틱스연구2017 · 제25권 제4호An Empirical Study on the Effect of Trust between Firms in the Supply Chain on Agility and Logistics Performance김수효, 이창준, Ha Byoung-Chun한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2024 · 제22권 제7호Supply Chain Agility: Achieving Robustness and Logistics Performance이창준, 하영규한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2024 · 제22권 제9호공급사슬 지향성, 민첩성 및 성과 간의 관계: 수도권 소재 중소 제조 기업을 대상으로김종영, 박종우, 조동혁한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2015 · 제22권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

전시 수요 형태별 최적 보급수준에 대한 정량적 산출: 육군 유류 공급을 중심으로문성암, 전병희, 임정혁pp. 1-16친환경 포장 물류와 수⋅배송 물류에서 운송거리(Pallet_km) 별 CO2배출량 표 작성과 활용에 관한 연구홍상태, 박석하pp. 17-27경량화 언어 모델 기반 비정형 물류 주문 정보 자동 추출에 관한 연구임현우, 정영철pp. 29-41항공 지상조업서비스의 작업장위험에 관한 연구: 직무위험관리 매트릭스를 중심으로정대규, 이평수, 유호정pp. 61-74Spatial Dynamics of Parcel Lockers in Budapest: A Multi-Provider Analysis of Location Strategies and Urban Co-location Patterns크리스티안 보나, 강상균, 김민지pp. 75-98
원문 보기