본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현행 준조세 통제규범의 문제점과 개선방안 -부담금, 수수료, 기부금을 중심으로-

A Study on the Legal Improvement Scheme of Quasi-Tax in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The notion of quasi-tax can be variously defined according to lawyers and scholars. However, it is common in that each definition emphasis the compulsive power on the payers as an essential elements. In this aspect, the scope of quasi-tax can cover surcharge, public service fees and even nov-voluntary donations. In modern countries, governments come to pursue diverse resources to meet their demands for the public finance. In the same context, the korean government has also established and operated lots of quasi-tax during last a few decades. Currently, whole amount of the quasi-taxes which has been imposed on payers is equivalent to that of tax. Actually, the system of quasi-tax itself has many merits and benefits. Nevertheless public opinions on the quasi-taxes are not that favorable. It is mainly because operating activities on the quasi-taxes in Korea have not so transparently controlled by law, compared with the controls on taxes. From the process of preparing to administering quasi-tax, normal control on it is not sufficiently applied. For that reason, justification of quasi-tax is getting weak and there are some requests to amende or abolish it. In this situation, endeavors and trials to improve current quasi-tax system are urgently requested. This paper tries to suggest some legislative ideas for the more transparent quasi-tax system. For this purpose it makes an analysis of current quasi-tax system with an angle of the transparency of public finance, and points out some legislative problems regarding imposition, collection and usage of quasi-tax. In conclusion, the paper insists a comprehensive legislation to control whole quasi-tax from imposition through ex-post audit is needed, and proposes several concrete schemes to improve current laws.

Abstract

The notion of quasi-tax can be variously defined according to lawyers and scholars. However, it is common in that each definition emphasis the compulsive power on the payers as an essential elements. In this aspect, the scope of quasi-tax can cover surcharge, public service fees and even nov-voluntary donations. In modern countries, governments come to pursue diverse resources to meet their demands for the public finance. In the same context, the korean government has also established and operated lots of quasi-tax during last a few decades. Currently, whole amount of the quasi-taxes which has been imposed on payers is equivalent to that of tax. Actually, the system of quasi-tax itself has many merits and benefits. Nevertheless public opinions on the quasi-taxes are not that favorable. It is mainly because operating activities on the quasi-taxes in Korea have not so transparently controlled by law, compared with the controls on taxes. From the process of preparing to administering quasi-tax, normal control on it is not sufficiently applied. For that reason, justification of quasi-tax is getting weak and there are some requests to amende or abolish it. In this situation, endeavors and trials to improve current quasi-tax system are urgently requested. This paper tries to suggest some legislative ideas for the more transparent quasi-tax system. For this purpose it makes an analysis of current quasi-tax system with an angle of the transparency of public finance, and points out some legislative problems regarding imposition, collection and usage of quasi-tax. In conclusion, the paper insists a comprehensive legislation to control whole quasi-tax from imposition through ex-post audit is needed, and proposes several concrete schemes to improve current laws.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 감사원, "감사원이 본 민선자치 10년 :성과와 과제", ~ (2006)
  2. 2011년도 부담금운용종합보고서, "기획재정부", ~ (2012)
  3. 김상헌, "준조세의 개념과 규모에 관한 소고: 조세성 부담금과 비조세성 부담금을 중심으로", 공공경제, 10(1), pp.67~91 (2005), 한국재정학회
  4. 김진수, "기업의 기부활동과 조세정책", 재정포럼, 10(9)통권 : 111, pp.56~83 (2005), 한국조세연구원
  5. 손원익, "준조세의 범위와 규모", 稅務士, 24(1)통권 : 108, pp.31~39 (2006), 한국세무사회
  6. 우리나라 준조세의 실태 및 정책방향, "손원익", 한국조세연구원, ~ (2010)
  7. 준조세 운용의 투명성 제고를 위한 법제개선 방안, "신영수", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2007)
  8. 준조세의 실태와 정비 방안, "신종익", 한국경제연구원, ~ (2006)
  9. 조세 외 금전지급의무제도의 투명성 제고를 위한 법제정비방안, "오준근", 한국법제연구원, ~ (1998)
  10. 중소기업의 준조세부담 실태분석, "중소기업중앙회", 중소기업중앙회, ~ (2006)
  11. 樓井敬子, "財政の法學的硏究" (2001), 有斐閣
  12. 日本財政法學會, "財政法の基本課題" (2005), 勁草書房
  13. Allen Schick, "The Federal Budget-Politics, Policy, Process-" (2000), The Brookings Institute
  14. OECD, "Revenue Statistics of OECD Member Countries" (2004), OECD
  15. Richard W. Tresch, "Public Finance(2nd ed.)" (2002), Academic Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)