본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국고보조금의 법적 성격과 집행의 실효성확보 강화방안에 대한 고찰

A Study on the Legal Character of Government Subsidies and the Institutional Tools for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Subsidized Programs

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Government subsidies are a form of fiscal grants that are allocated to specific administrative tasks or programs of private sector or local government entities. The budget of government subsidies for FY 2011 amount to KRW 43.7 trillion, or 14.1% of the government budget(KRW 309.1 trillion), and the ratio of government subsidies has grown every year. On the other hand, subsidized programs are implemented by private or local government entities, leading to a significant number of illegally or in appropriately executed subsidy programs according to the Board of Audit and Inspection. Therefore, ensuring the effectiveness of subsidized programs as become a key task in order to ensure the efficient management of budgetary funds and achievement of allocation objectives. Until now, discussions on government subsidies have been conducted in terms of public administration and fiscal management from the perspective of intergovernmental transfer of funds. In this regard, this study aims to review the current Framework Act on the Budget and Management of Government Subsidies, and the proposed revision bill submitted by the government to the National Assembly, to identify the institutional tools for ensuring effectiveness as well as current limitations. The study will also seek to propose the introduction of additional measures to enhance the effectiveness of government subsidies. This study reviews the possible introduction of additional charges and public release of lists that contain unlawful concessionaires. Firstly, when subsidized programs are cancelled due to illegal or inappropriate execution, mandatory collection of cancelled subsidies is legally enforced. However, there are no legal stipulations on the collection of interest for delayed return of subsidies. As a result, this may lead to an inappropriate situation where unethical concessionaires can gain profits. Therefore, there is a need to include a legal basis for the collection of additional charges in the Framework Act on Government Subsidies. Furthermore, the central government entity has limitations in monitoring and overseeing more than 1,100 programs implemented by subsidized concessionaires in the private sector. Therefore, there is a need for the introduction of a system under which a list of unlawful concessionaires that have violated orders in the past is kept and managed. While administrative actions through subsidies are inevitable, and the amount of subsidies is increasing due to rising social welfare and regional development programs, the reality presents frequent unlawful and inappropriate execution of subsidies. In this regard, it is of utmost importance to ensure the effectiveness of government subsidies to achieve the intended objectives and maximize fiscal efficiency. Through additional measures for ensuring effectiveness, fiscal democracy could also be strengthened.

Abstract

Government subsidies are a form of fiscal grants that are allocated to specific administrative tasks or programs of private sector or local government entities. The budget of government subsidies for FY 2011 amount to KRW 43.7 trillion, or 14.1% of the government budget(KRW 309.1 trillion), and the ratio of government subsidies has grown every year. On the other hand, subsidized programs are implemented by private or local government entities, leading to a significant number of illegally or in appropriately executed subsidy programs according to the Board of Audit and Inspection. Therefore, ensuring the effectiveness of subsidized programs as become a key task in order to ensure the efficient management of budgetary funds and achievement of allocation objectives. Until now, discussions on government subsidies have been conducted in terms of public administration and fiscal management from the perspective of intergovernmental transfer of funds. In this regard, this study aims to review the current Framework Act on the Budget and Management of Government Subsidies, and the proposed revision bill submitted by the government to the National Assembly, to identify the institutional tools for ensuring effectiveness as well as current limitations. The study will also seek to propose the introduction of additional measures to enhance the effectiveness of government subsidies. This study reviews the possible introduction of additional charges and public release of lists that contain unlawful concessionaires. Firstly, when subsidized programs are cancelled due to illegal or inappropriate execution, mandatory collection of cancelled subsidies is legally enforced. However, there are no legal stipulations on the collection of interest for delayed return of subsidies. As a result, this may lead to an inappropriate situation where unethical concessionaires can gain profits. Therefore, there is a need to include a legal basis for the collection of additional charges in the Framework Act on Government Subsidies. Furthermore, the central government entity has limitations in monitoring and overseeing more than 1,100 programs implemented by subsidized concessionaires in the private sector. Therefore, there is a need for the introduction of a system under which a list of unlawful concessionaires that have violated orders in the past is kept and managed. While administrative actions through subsidies are inevitable, and the amount of subsidies is increasing due to rising social welfare and regional development programs, the reality presents frequent unlawful and inappropriate execution of subsidies. In this regard, it is of utmost importance to ensure the effectiveness of government subsidies to achieve the intended objectives and maximize fiscal efficiency. Through additional measures for ensuring effectiveness, fiscal democracy could also be strengthened.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 강구철, "강의행정법(Ⅰ)" (1993), 학연사
  2. 권오성, "주요국 지방재정지원제도 분석" (2006), 행정연구원
  3. 김동희, "행정법(Ⅰ)" (2009), 박영사
  4. 김정훈, "국고보조금제도 개선방안" (2008), 한국조세연구원
  5. 김철수, "헌법학신론" (2008), 박영사
  6. 김치환, "행정집행법제의 개선방안 연구" (2004), 한국법제연구원
  7. 김해룡, "국세징수법상 관허사업제한제도에 관한 입법 평가" (2008), 한국법제연구원
  8. 박균성, "행정법강의" (2004), 박영사
  9. 이상규, "신행정법론(하)" (1994), 법문사
  10. 정남철, "지방재정지원제도에 관한 법제연구(Ⅱ)-보조금" (2008), 한국법제연구원
  11. 정하중, "행정법총론" (2005), 법문사
  12. 지원림, "민법강의" (2010), 박영사
  13. 김병기, "보조금의 법적 성질과 보조금교부결정 취소사유 - ‘대법원 2007. 3. 30. 선고 2006두16984 판결’을 중심으로", 토지공법연구, 43(1), pp.593~614 (2009), 한국토지공법학회
  14. 김용섭, "행정행위의 부관에 관한 법리", 행정법연구, (2) (1998), 행정법이론실무학회
  15. 김용섭, "보조금교부결정취소를 둘러싼 법적 문제", JURIST, (408) (2004), 판례월보사
  16. 한건우, "보조금의 예산 및 관리에 관한 법률상의 보조금행정", 저스티스, 31(2) (1998), 한국법학원
  17. 경제기획원, "보조금의 예산 및 관리에 관한 법률해설", ~ (1989)
  18. 행정안전부, "2009년 지자체 예산개요", ~ (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)