본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

방송통신 융합서비스에서의 방송과 통신의 법적 개념에 관한 연구

Study on the Legal Ideology of Broadcasting and Telecommunication in the Convergence Service of Broadcasting and Telecommunication

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Technically, the convergence of Broadcasting and Telecommunication means an appearance of a new media or service due to the development of the convergence technology. Since the legislation has to be developed according to the current of the time, a modification of the legislation system is being needed,suitable for the convergence service. The legal system has fundamental rights or ideologies which have to be protected. Freedom for Broadcasting and protection of secrets and freedom for Telecommunication are the constitutional protection ideologies of them. Therefore,to converge these concepts and regulate them by one united legislation, a convergence of both fundamental rights or a creation of a new fundamental right is required. However, converging different fundamental rights is impossible unless these are reiterated, and for creating a new fundamental right, the grounds are insufficient. Therefore, though a technical concept of convergence of Broadcasting and Telecommunication exists, a legal concept of such a convergence does not. But, by regulating the “new” service with the “traditional” regulations would cause vacuum or repetition of the legislation system, for that reasons, the modification of the legal regulation system is necessary. To regulate this “convergence service”, a dividing this service into “Broadcasting Service” and “Telecommunication Service”, and regulating them separately adoptable to their different legal ideologies seems reasonable. For dividing the convergence service separately into “Broadcasting” and “Telecommunication”, “real time” and “selection authority” could be the criteria. Using this criteria, “the freedom for Broadcasting” and “protection of Telecommunication”can be divided without losing their basic ideology. The service provided in “real time” and without “selection authority” is Broadcasting, and the service provided with “selection authority” but not in “real time” is Telecommunication. The modification of the legislation system could be done by using this standard. After the modification of the regulation system, the individual strength of the regulating system each has to be set, and many investigations for the obvious definition of the purpose, ideology and regulation direction have to be accomplished.

Abstract

Technically, the convergence of Broadcasting and Telecommunication means an appearance of a new media or service due to the development of the convergence technology. Since the legislation has to be developed according to the current of the time, a modification of the legislation system is being needed,suitable for the convergence service. The legal system has fundamental rights or ideologies which have to be protected. Freedom for Broadcasting and protection of secrets and freedom for Telecommunication are the constitutional protection ideologies of them. Therefore,to converge these concepts and regulate them by one united legislation, a convergence of both fundamental rights or a creation of a new fundamental right is required. However, converging different fundamental rights is impossible unless these are reiterated, and for creating a new fundamental right, the grounds are insufficient. Therefore, though a technical concept of convergence of Broadcasting and Telecommunication exists, a legal concept of such a convergence does not. But, by regulating the “new” service with the “traditional” regulations would cause vacuum or repetition of the legislation system, for that reasons, the modification of the legal regulation system is necessary. To regulate this “convergence service”, a dividing this service into “Broadcasting Service” and “Telecommunication Service”, and regulating them separately adoptable to their different legal ideologies seems reasonable. For dividing the convergence service separately into “Broadcasting” and “Telecommunication”, “real time” and “selection authority” could be the criteria. Using this criteria, “the freedom for Broadcasting” and “protection of Telecommunication”can be divided without losing their basic ideology. The service provided in “real time” and without “selection authority” is Broadcasting, and the service provided with “selection authority” but not in “real time” is Telecommunication. The modification of the legislation system could be done by using this standard. After the modification of the regulation system, the individual strength of the regulating system each has to be set, and many investigations for the obvious definition of the purpose, ideology and regulation direction have to be accomplished.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2004), 법문사
  2. 계희열, "헌법(상)" (2000), 박영사
  3. 김영임, "방송학 개론" (1997), 나남출판사
  4. 김창곤, "정보통신 서비스 정책" (2004), Jinhan M&B
  5. 김창규, "방송ㆍ통신의 융합과 디지털시대의 정보미디어 법제, 그리고 정책" (2008), 동방문화사
  6. 곽상진, "방송의 자유와 방송제도", 공법연구, 4(1) (2000), 한국공법학회
  7. 김국진, "통신방송의 융합과 방송의 발전방향", 방송공학회지, 17(4) (2002), 한국방송공학회지
  8. 박선영, "헌법 제21조에 대한 개헌 논의", 헌법학연구, 12(4) (2006)
  9. 성낙인, "통신에서의 기본권보호", 공법연구, 30(2) (2001), 한국공법학회
  10. 성선제, "방송통신융합의 기본원리와 법적 규제", 토지공법연구, 33, pp.385~406 (2006), 한국토지공법학회
  11. 정책기획위원회, "소통과 참여의 문화국가(2005년 정책기획과제)" (2007), 대통령자문 정책기획위원회
  12. 주정민, "방송통신 융합에 따른 산업구조의 변화와 공익성", 한국언론정보학보, 36, pp.109~133 (2006), 한국언론정보학회
  13. 지성우, "방송ㆍ통신 융합에 따른 행정기구개편과정의 회고와 전망", 성균관법학, 20(1), pp.35~63 (2008), 법학연구소
  14. 지성우, "미디어 융합시대에 대비한 방송관계법의 개정과제와 전망", 법학논총, 32(1), pp.73~115 (2008), 법학연구소
  15. 최우정, "헌법상 개념으로서의 방송- 독일에서의 논의를 한국적 수용을 중심으로", 공법학연구, 5(3), pp.269~298 (2004), 한국비교공법학회
  16. Thomas F. Baldwin, "Convergence: Its Meaning, Scenarios, Effect on Industry", The 9th KISDI International Conferencd: Convergence of Telecommunication and Broadcasting (1997), KISDI

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)