본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국의 의료분쟁해결에 있어 의료손해감정

Technical Authentication of Medical Malpractice in China

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since reforme and opening up, China has achieved rapid economic development. As economic achievement improves the welfare of Chinese people,the improvement of law system through Chinese society is consequently required. During the 1990s, China had extensively modified law systems, which provided legal basis for medical field. Even though the legal basis in medical field, China is still based on the general provision of Civil Law about the law issues related with civil case. Furthermore, any proper regulation and law to resolve medical dispute over medical malpractice did not exist. It was not until the year of 2009that China legislated Tort Law by which illegal acts are regulated. Tort Law also regulated the liability of damage caused by medical malpractice, and with this, the legal system to resolve medical malpractice could be established. In this analysis, technical authentication of medical malpractice will be discussed, which is in the important position as an objective evidence in order to resolve medical malpractice. Recently, in China the medical malpractice is resolved through the process of either litigation or non-litigation, so-called ADR(alternative dispute resolution). However, the medical dispute would be resolved more frequently by administrative resolution and arbitration than litigation sued by the victim. In this case, of course, technical authentication of medical malpractice is indeed playing an important role to resolve medical dispute. Nevertheless, it still has many problems in terms of the results which are different depending on who authenticates, and the standard of authentication. 656 法學論叢 第36卷 第2號Thus, the analysis will research on the basic understanding of Chinese medical dispute and dispute circumstance, first, and then examine how the process of technical authentication of medical malpractice would go through and what the problems are.

Abstract

Since reforme and opening up, China has achieved rapid economic development. As economic achievement improves the welfare of Chinese people,the improvement of law system through Chinese society is consequently required. During the 1990s, China had extensively modified law systems, which provided legal basis for medical field. Even though the legal basis in medical field, China is still based on the general provision of Civil Law about the law issues related with civil case. Furthermore, any proper regulation and law to resolve medical dispute over medical malpractice did not exist. It was not until the year of 2009that China legislated Tort Law by which illegal acts are regulated. Tort Law also regulated the liability of damage caused by medical malpractice, and with this, the legal system to resolve medical malpractice could be established. In this analysis, technical authentication of medical malpractice will be discussed, which is in the important position as an objective evidence in order to resolve medical malpractice. Recently, in China the medical malpractice is resolved through the process of either litigation or non-litigation, so-called ADR(alternative dispute resolution). However, the medical dispute would be resolved more frequently by administrative resolution and arbitration than litigation sued by the victim. In this case, of course, technical authentication of medical malpractice is indeed playing an important role to resolve medical dispute. Nevertheless, it still has many problems in terms of the results which are different depending on who authenticates, and the standard of authentication. 656 法學論叢 第36卷 第2號Thus, the analysis will research on the basic understanding of Chinese medical dispute and dispute circumstance, first, and then examine how the process of technical authentication of medical malpractice would go through and what the problems are.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 方鹏骞, "中国转型期医疗纠纷非诉讼解决机制研究" (2011), 科学出版社
  2. 梁华仁, "医疗事故的认定与法律处理" (1998), 法律出版社
  3. 徐明永, "医疗损害赔偿纠纷" (2011), 法律出版社
  4. 单国军, "医疗损害" (2010), 中国法制出版社
  5. 孟强, "医疗损害责任" (2010), 法律出版社
  6. 杨立新, "医疗损害责任研究" (2009), 法律出版社
  7. 黄戈, "医疗事故技术鉴定的法律思考", 解放军医院管理杂志, 18(11) (2011)
  8. 陈志华, "医疗会从事医疗损害鉴定之合法性研究", 论据科学, 19(3) (2011)
  9. 方鹏骞, "医疗纠纷处理双轨制对医疗事故技术鉴定结局的影响分析", 中国医院管理, 32(2)통권 : 367 (2012)
  10. 김정진, "중국 의료분쟁에 관한 소송외적 해결시스템 고찰 -협상 해결시스템을 중심으로-", 의료분쟁의 소송외적 해결방안(ADR),원광대학교 법학연구소 의생명과학법센터 추계학술대회 발표논문 (2012)
  11. 김정진, "중국《侵权责", b>b>, 과학기술법연구, pp.2012, 19(3)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (35건)