侵权责任法与医疗过错民事责任
Civil liability of medical malpractice of Tort liability law
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In civil case,although medical dispute case has no majority, it has great social influence and has high degree of public concern. how to deal with medical dispute case objectively and fairly is a hotpot and difficult problem to be urgent need to solve in civil law. Since 1st September 2002, the implementation of “regulations on handling of medical accident”, for medical dispute, china has been continuing to apply the two element system of law. It obviously violate unification of legal system and result in greater social contradiction. So “Tort liability law” executed from 1st July 2010 regulate medical liability of damage in medical chapter and systematically specify medical cases from the aspect of law system, thus it end the two element system of law application. “Tort liability law” unify the main points of a case of application of medical damage liability in the courts and regulate new medical damage liability relief rules and initially establish a unified medical damage relief system. But there are many deficiencies in “Tort liability law”. For example, the relevant provisions of the burden of proof for medical damage compensation is not clear, the regulation of providing medical record is not reasonable, it can’t reflect the particularity of the medical damage compensation in application of personal injury compensation standards, Determination of the “medical level of the time” is difficult, The distribution of the burden of proof is unfair and it doesn’t regulate relevant system about sharing responsibility of medical damage and so on. If we wouldn’t pay enough attention to these problems, it will not be conducive to resolve the contradiction between doctors and patients. Basing on the relevant regulation of medical damage civil liability of “Tort liability law”, this paper would discuss the success and failure of this relevant regulation mainly on principle of imputation and burden of proof and judgment standard of malpractice and the scope of medical damage compensation responsibility, introduce academic insights, reveal the position of this paper.
Abstract
In civil case,although medical dispute case has no majority, it has great social influence and has high degree of public concern. how to deal with medical dispute case objectively and fairly is a hotpot and difficult problem to be urgent need to solve in civil law. Since 1st September 2002, the implementation of “regulations on handling of medical accident”, for medical dispute, china has been continuing to apply the two element system of law. It obviously violate unification of legal system and result in greater social contradiction. So “Tort liability law” executed from 1st July 2010 regulate medical liability of damage in medical chapter and systematically specify medical cases from the aspect of law system, thus it end the two element system of law application. “Tort liability law” unify the main points of a case of application of medical damage liability in the courts and regulate new medical damage liability relief rules and initially establish a unified medical damage relief system. But there are many deficiencies in “Tort liability law”. For example, the relevant provisions of the burden of proof for medical damage compensation is not clear, the regulation of providing medical record is not reasonable, it can’t reflect the particularity of the medical damage compensation in application of personal injury compensation standards, Determination of the “medical level of the time” is difficult, The distribution of the burden of proof is unfair and it doesn’t regulate relevant system about sharing responsibility of medical damage and so on. If we wouldn’t pay enough attention to these problems, it will not be conducive to resolve the contradiction between doctors and patients. Basing on the relevant regulation of medical damage civil liability of “Tort liability law”, this paper would discuss the success and failure of this relevant regulation mainly on principle of imputation and burden of proof and judgment standard of malpractice and the scope of medical damage compensation responsibility, introduce academic insights, reveal the position of this paper.
참고문헌 (29)
- 杨立新, "医疗损害责任概念研究", 政治与法律, 3, pp.77~ (2009)
- 郑雪倩, "医疗侵权的归责与举证", 中国医院, 7, pp.2~ (2009)
- 杨立新, "上揭论文", ~
- 郑雪倩, "医疗侵权的归责于举证", 中国医院, 13, pp.3~ (2009)
- 金洁, "论我国医疗纠纷案件中过错要件的举证责任分配", 现代商贸工业, 16, pp.301~302 (2010)
- 梁慧星, "论《侵权责任法》中的医疗损害责任", 中国检察官, 1, pp.77~ (2011)
- "侵权责任法 第55条", ~
- "侵权责任法 第58条", ~
- "侵权责任法 第60条", ~
- 郑雪倩, "前揭论文", 3~
- "韩国大法院93다52402判决", ~
- 梁慧星, "论侵权责任法中的医疗损害责任", 中国检察官, 1, pp.77~ (2011)
- 相同见解, "杨立新 中华人民共和国侵权责任法 条文释解与司法适用", pp.413~ (2010), 人民法院出版社
- 王胜明, "中华人民共和国侵权责任法 条文解释与立法背景", pp.226~ (2010), 人民法院出版社
- 郑雪倩, "正确理解侵权责任法之医疗损害责任, In 侵权法背景下的民事侵权与知识产权实务", pp.108~ (2010), 北京大学出版社
- 郑雪倩, "前揭论文", pp.107~
- 杨立新, "侵权责任法改革医疗损害制度的成功与不足", 10~
- "侵权责任法第42条", ~
- 王丹青, "关于医疗产品损害责任的完善建议", 中国卫生法制, 18, pp.43~45 (2010)
- "侵权责任法 第57条:关于诊疗义务的规定"[URL]
- "论《侵权责任法》的解释"[URL]
- 王胜明, "中华人民共和国侵权责任法解读", pp.283~ (2010), 中国法制出版社
- 艾尔肯, "论医疗过失的判断标准", 辽宁师范大学学报, 3, pp.28~ (2007)
- 强美英, "论医疗过失的认定", 法学杂志, 8, pp.50~ (2010)
- "潭中民一终字第263号民事判决书", ~ (2010)
- 上海市松江区人民法院, "松民一(民)初字第3235号民事判决书", ~ (2011)
- "侵权责任法 第37条", ~
- "医疗事故处理条例 第49条", ~
- 朱祖飞, "前揭论文", ~
