본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

확률형 게임아이템의 법률 문제

Legal Issues for Probability-type Game Items

0

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

According to this study, the probability of default of other items incidental toobtain the probability that action type for the item for a review of the legalissues are centered. The biggest problem with the item probability model usingthe Game software on the part of the young people in a manner provided inthe charge, and pay them through the payment of excessive is that you can buy. The probability of early -type items, such as MMORPG mainly consists mainlycame from. In recent years, the spread of mobile Game software Mobile Gamesoftware items in the probability model is the fact that this is a problem. Butthe core of the problem with the item probability model with a minor amountof a payment that is not excessive in itself, equivalent to four gambling orgambling Game software is difficult to see in Game software. Some gambling isregulated in the probability of frame -type items also looking at the opinion thatthe operators will have to consider. Mobile Game software growth probability-type items, including the right partof the model is that charge. Thus, the probability of carrier-type games with theitem that caused the problem, and this negative phenomenon in the legalregulation and self-regulation needs to be examined. Operators as well as gamesin 2008, the probability of self-regulatory approach to establish guidelines for theitem type has one. At that time limit has been limited to online games. Nowthe bigger problem in mobile games to mobile Game software, because theprobability of the establishment of self-regulation for the item type is required. Self-regulatory approach that will fulfill corporate social responsibility. Probabilityof gambling elements form the view that the item itself is difficult, regulators, policy regulation be done when the game operators youth protection and theexterior face of criticism that, as a result, the game industry to expand thenegative frame, and As a result, confidence in the market for the gamesindustry is a view that can hurt.

Abstract

According to this study, the probability of default of other items incidental toobtain the probability that action type for the item for a review of the legalissues are centered. The biggest problem with the item probability model usingthe Game software on the part of the young people in a manner provided inthe charge, and pay them through the payment of excessive is that you can buy. The probability of early -type items, such as MMORPG mainly consists mainlycame from. In recent years, the spread of mobile Game software Mobile Gamesoftware items in the probability model is the fact that this is a problem. Butthe core of the problem with the item probability model with a minor amountof a payment that is not excessive in itself, equivalent to four gambling orgambling Game software is difficult to see in Game software. Some gambling isregulated in the probability of frame -type items also looking at the opinion thatthe operators will have to consider. Mobile Game software growth probability-type items, including the right partof the model is that charge. Thus, the probability of carrier-type games with theitem that caused the problem, and this negative phenomenon in the legalregulation and self-regulation needs to be examined. Operators as well as gamesin 2008, the probability of self-regulatory approach to establish guidelines for theitem type has one. At that time limit has been limited to online games. Nowthe bigger problem in mobile games to mobile Game software, because theprobability of the establishment of self-regulation for the item type is required. Self-regulatory approach that will fulfill corporate social responsibility. Probabilityof gambling elements form the view that the item itself is difficult, regulators, policy regulation be done when the game operators youth protection and theexterior face of criticism that, as a result, the game industry to expand thenegative frame, and As a result, confidence in the market for the gamesindustry is a view that can hurt.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 한국콘텐츠진흥원, "2012 대한민국 게임백서" (2012)
  2. 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2002), 박영사
  3. 권헌영, "인터넷 규제의 법이론적 기초와 쟁점", 구글 개방성포럼 (2013)
  4. 디지털재산법연구, "게임물 등급분류제도의 문제점 및 개선방안", 디지털재산법연구, 9 (2010)
  5. 김윤명, "게임물의 창작활성화를 위한 게임법상 내용규제 검토 - 게임법상 내용수정신고제도 및 이에 대한 게임법 개정안의 검토를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 52(2), pp.531~559 (2011), 법학연구소
  6. 김윤명, "온라인게임에서 미성년자의 행위능력에 관한 소고", 디지털재산법연구, 2(2) (2003)
  7. 김일수, "형법각론" (2007), 박영사
  8. 김정환, "청소년 보호를 위한 게임물(확률형 아이템)의 합리적 규제 방안", 법학연구, 15(3), pp.211~240 (2012), 법학연구소
  9. 김지훈, "1회 1만원 베팅한도 규제에 대한 검토", 게임규제의 기술적 의미와 법률적 검토 세미나 자료집 (2013), 한국컴퓨터게임학회
  10. 문기탁, "비즈니스 모델로서 간접충전 방식이 합법적인 이유", 게임규제의 기술적 의미와 법률적 검토 세미나 자료집 (2013), 한국컴퓨터게임학회
  11. 박균성, "행정법 기본강의" (2010), 박영사
  12. 박종현, "청소년 보호를 목적으로 하는 인터넷 규제의 의의와 한계 ― 최근의 소위 셧다운제 도입문제를 중심으로 ―", 언론과 법, 10(2), pp.111~145 (2011), (사)한국언론법학회
  13. 서혜진, "넥슨코리아 등 모바일게임사 16곳, 청약철회 방해로 6400만원 과태료", 파이낸셜뉴스, ~ (2012)
  14. 유대종, "게임아이템의 청약철회에 관한 소고", 디지털재산법연구, 9 (2010)
  15. 이승훈, "웹보드게임 10만원 규제한도 문제점에 대한 연구", 게임규제의 기술적 의미와 법률적 검토 세미나 자료집 (2013)
  16. 이재상, "형법각론" (2013), 박영사
  17. 이정훈, "게임아이템 거래와 형사법적 문제, 게임법제도의 현황과 과제" (2009), 박영사
  18. 정정원, "온라인게임 아이템의 형사법적 취급", 법학논총, 29(4), pp.473~494 (2012), 법학연구소
  19. 조형근, "웹툰 자율규제 결정과 향후 문화콘텐츠 내용규제의 방향", 이슈와 논점, (446) (2012)
  20. 최경진, "전자계약상 미성년자 보호", e-비즈니스 법제연구 (2002), 한국전산원
  21. 최병선, "정부규제론" (2012), 법문사
  22. 이규호, "인터넷, 그 길을 묻다" (2012), 중앙Books
  23. 허준, "김택진 엔씨 자성…“청소년 사행성 아이템 판매는 문제”", 아이뉴스24, ~ (2013)
  24. 자율규제 확대를 위한 법제개선 연구, "현대호", 법제연구원, ~, pp.연구보고 2009-03 (2009)
  25. 정보재산권의 형사법적 보호와 한계, "홍승희", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)