확률형 게임아이템에 관한 사행성 규제의 한계

Abstract

Random logic is the decisive factor in one’s fun on game. And in case to gain in economic advantage or damage by random logic, user is absorbed in the game by inclination to gambling. If user is able to change a game-item into cash, to get more deeply inclination to gambling, he may be ready to make ducks and drakes of his money on the game. For the most part, games on game-items obtained by random logic have not the function to change a game-item into cash, but to encourage excessive consumption. So I think that legal policy on inclination to gambling must reflect propriety of game expenses. I hope that we will consider inclination to gambling to inheres in traditional games(a game of slap-match, a game of marbles etc.), almost freely available, in korea. In condition of game industry to be rampant, difficulties on legal policy against inclination to gambling rest in rational uniform standard to be inapplicable to m ultiformity and transmutability of games. So I think that a basis of legal policy on game is not inclination to gambling but propriety of game expenses. This fact is worthy of notice on propriety of game expenses for teens too.