본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Поэтика современной русской литературы: особенности субъектной организации, трансформация жанров и родов

Poetics of the contemporary Russian literature: narrative specificity, transformation of genres, epos and drama

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Contemporary Russian literature is a subject of numerous discussions and philological studies in Russia and abroad. Nevertheless there is still no clear-cut description of its main poetic features and dominant tendencies in the literary process. V. L. Shunikov, an assistant professor of Moscow state university and a visiting professor at Seoul national university in 2008-2010, tries to fill up the gap. He analyzed more then ten novels and stories (‘povesty’), written in 1980-2000s, and basing on it compares the subject and object structure of the latest Russian prose with the literary tradition as a whole. From one hand these works are examined in the light of the classical narratological concept, grew up on the literature of the 19th – the first half of the 20th centuries. On the other hand the latest Russian novels and stories discusses in comparison with the chronologically nearest aesthetics, e. g. postmodern. Thanks to dominant role of the subjective structure in the novels and stories, written in 1980-2000s, Shunikov pays main attention to the characteristics of the narrators and their competence. The global process of the functional unification and voice equalization of all ‘speaking subjects’ (narrators and characters as well) is discovered in the contemporary prose. There are three steps of this process and for each of them the author of the article describes the most frequent techniques of writing. At the same time it is shown how the transformation of the narrative influences on the internal world. A new – narratological – meaning of such terms as ‘event’, ‘plot’ et cetera is explained. At last all these peculiarities eliminate differences between genres and between epic literature and drama. V. L. Shunikov proves the largest part of narrative configurations in the latest prose belongs to the postmodernism, so he corrects commonplace that contemporary Russian literature got over this aesthetics. Author asserts at the same time postmodern writing technique is aimed to manifest not a relativistic postmodern philosophy, but other concepts, then we can talk about POSTpostmodern or neo- (neorealistic, neoromantic, neosentimental…) poetics.

Abstract

Contemporary Russian literature is a subject of numerous discussions and philological studies in Russia and abroad. Nevertheless there is still no clear-cut description of its main poetic features and dominant tendencies in the literary process. V. L. Shunikov, an assistant professor of Moscow state university and a visiting professor at Seoul national university in 2008-2010, tries to fill up the gap. He analyzed more then ten novels and stories (‘povesty’), written in 1980-2000s, and basing on it compares the subject and object structure of the latest Russian prose with the literary tradition as a whole. From one hand these works are examined in the light of the classical narratological concept, grew up on the literature of the 19th – the first half of the 20th centuries. On the other hand the latest Russian novels and stories discusses in comparison with the chronologically nearest aesthetics, e. g. postmodern. Thanks to dominant role of the subjective structure in the novels and stories, written in 1980-2000s, Shunikov pays main attention to the characteristics of the narrators and their competence. The global process of the functional unification and voice equalization of all ‘speaking subjects’ (narrators and characters as well) is discovered in the contemporary prose. There are three steps of this process and for each of them the author of the article describes the most frequent techniques of writing. At the same time it is shown how the transformation of the narrative influences on the internal world. A new – narratological – meaning of such terms as ‘event’, ‘plot’ et cetera is explained. At last all these peculiarities eliminate differences between genres and between epic literature and drama. V. L. Shunikov proves the largest part of narrative configurations in the latest prose belongs to the postmodernism, so he corrects commonplace that contemporary Russian literature got over this aesthetics. Author asserts at the same time postmodern writing technique is aimed to manifest not a relativistic postmodern philosophy, but other concepts, then we can talk about POSTpostmodern or neo- (neorealistic, neoromantic, neosentimental…) poetics.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Brooke-Rose, Chr., "The dissolution of character in the novel, Reconstructing individualism : autonomy, individuality, and the self in western thought" (1986)
  2. Бахтин М. М., "Проблемы ПОЭТИКИ Достоевского" (1972), Художественная литература
  3. Бахтин М. М., "Эпос и роман" (2000), Азбука
  4. Битов А. Г., "Преподаватель симметрии. in: Человек в пейзаже : повесmu u рассказы" (1988), Советский писатель
  5. Гольдштейн А., "Помни о Фаmazуcme" (2004), Новое литературное обозрение
  6. "Дарк О. Смерть в гриме (Загл. с экрана)"[URL]
  7. Деррида Ж., "о zраммаmолоzuu" (2002), Ad marginem
  8. Женетт Ж., "Границы повествовательности. in: Фцzуры. В 2- х тт. Т. 1" (1998), ИЗД-ВО ИМ, Сабашниковых
  9. Кабаков А., "Поздний roctъ. in: Счumаеmся побеz" (2001), Вагриуc
  10. КОНОНОВ H., "Похороны кузнечика. in: РОман в mрuбцаmu семц эпцзобах с пролоzом u эnunоzом" (2000), ИНАПРЕСС
  11. КОНОНОВ H., "Нежныŭ meamp. М", ~ (2004)
  12. Косиков Г. К., "О принципах повествования в романе, Лumераmурные направленuя u сmuлu. М", ~ (1976)
  13. Липовецкий М. Н., "Русскuŭ nосmмобернuзм. Екатеринбург", ~ (1997)
  14. Липовецкий М. Н., "ПМС (постмодернизм сегодня)", Знамя, (5) (2002)
  15. Лотман Ю. М., "Сmрукmура хубожесmвенноzо mексmа. М", ~ (1970)
  16. Маканин В., "АнÒеzраунÒ, uпu zероŭ нашеzо временц" (2001), Вагриус
  17. Ман, Поль де, "Аллеzорцц чmеня. Издательство Уральского университета, - серия: Studia Humanitatis", ~ (1999)
  18. Слаповский А., "Я - не я. in: Первое вmорое npuwecmвце. Анкеmа. Я - не я" (1999), Грантъ
  19. Тамарченко Н. Д., "Теория лиmераmуры: учебное пособuе. В 2 т. Т. 1. Теорuя хуòожесmвенноzо òuскурса. Теореmuческая nоэmuкa", Н. Д. Тамарченко, В. И. Тюпа, C. Н. Бройтман; ПОД ред. Н. Д. Тамарченко. М.: Академия, 2004
  20. Шишкин М., "Взяmuе Измаuла" (2004), Вагриус

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)