필연적 연결과 경험주의
Necessary Connection and Empricism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 논문에서 필자는 법칙, 인과, 설명에 관한 다양한 형태의 흄적 이론들이 반흄적 이론들에 비해서 경험론 친화적이라는 철학계에 널리 퍼진 생각에 문제가 있다는 것을 논증한다. 필자의 논증에 따르면, 우리가 매우 강한 형태의 경험론 친화성 기준을 사용할 경우 흄적 이론들과 반흄적 이론들은 같은 정도로 경험론 친화적이지 않으며, 반대로 우리가 충분히 너그러운 형태의 경험론 친화성 기준을 사용할 경우 흄적 이론들보다 반흄적 이론들이 더 경험론 친화적이게 된다. 이를 통해 필자는 합리적인 경험론자라면 흄적 이론들보다 반흄적 이론들을 선호해야한다고 주장한다.
Abstract
In this paper, I challenge the widespread idea that Humean theories concerning laws, causation, and explanation are more empiricism-friendly than anti-Humean theories. According to my argument, if we use a very strong criterion of empiricism affinity, neither Humeans theories nor anti-Humean theories are empiricism-friendly to the same degree, whereas if we use a sufficiently generous criterion, anti-Humean theories are more empiricism-friendly than Humean theories. On this basis, I argue that rational empiricists should prefer anti-Humean theories over Humean theories.
참고문헌 (35)
- 이재호, "흄적 설명이론들, 그리고 이들의 형이상학적 전제", 철학사상, (49), pp.207~236 (2013), 철학사상연구소[DOI]
- 이재호, "아리스토텔레스, 두헴, 밀, 그리고 설명에 관한 네 번째 길", 철학사상, (53), pp.165~201 (2014), 철학사상연구소[DOI]
- 이재호, "기술적 법칙 이론과 존재론적 경제성 논증", 철학적 분석, (43), pp.1~31 (2020), 한국분석철학회
- Armstrong, D. M, "What is a law of nature" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Bird, A, "Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties" (2007), Oxford University Press
- BonJour, L, "In defense of pure reason : a rationalist account of a priori justification" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Carroll, J. W, "Laws of nature" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Chalmers, D. J, "Constructing the World" (2012)
- Ellis, B. D, "Scientific essentialism" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Freeland, C. A, "Aristotle's Physics : a collection of essays" (1991), Oxford University Press
- Hempel, C. a. P. O, "Studies in the Logic of Explanation", hilosophy of Science, 15, pp.135~175 (1948)
- Hume, D, "A treatise of human nature" (1978), Oxford University Press
- Kim, J, "Hempel, explanation, metaphysics", Philosophical Studies, 94(1-2), pp.1~20 (1999)
- Kitcher, P, "Scientific explanation", pp.410~505 (1989), University of Minnesota Press
- Ladyman, J, "Understanding philosophy of science" (2002), Routledge
- Ladyman, J, "A defence of Van Fraassen's critique of abductive inference: Reply to Psillos", Philosophical Quarterly, 47(188), pp.305~321 (1997)
- Lee, J, "The Intelligibility of Necessary Connection and Conceivability"
- Lewis, D, "Counterfactuals" (1973), Blackwell
- Lewis, D, "New Work for a Theory of Universals", Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61(4), pp.343~377 (1983)
- Lewis, D, "Philosophical Papers Vol. II", pp.214~240 (1986), Oxford University Press
- Lewis, D, "On the plurality of worlds" (1986), Blackwell
- Lewis, D, "Philosophical papers (Vol. 2)" (1986), Oxford University Press
- Lewis, D, "Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism", pp.203~222 (2009), MIT Press
- Mill, J. S, "A System of Logic" (1963), University of Toronto Press
- Orenstein, A, "W. v. quine" (2002), Princeton University Press
- Psillos, S, "Causation and explanation" (2002), McGill-Queen's University Press
- Quine, W. V, "Two Dogmas of Empricism", Philosophical Review, 60(1), pp.20~43 (1951)
- Quine, W. V, "Metaphysics - An Anthology", pp.4~12 (1999), Blackwell
- Railton, P, "Scientific explanation", pp.220~252 (1989), University of Minnesota Press
- Ruben, D.-H, "Explaining explanation" (1990), Routledge
- Russell, B, "The problems of philosophy" (1990), Hackett Pub. Co
- Salmon, W. C, "Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world" (1984), Princeton University Press
- Salmon, W. C, "Scientific explanation", pp.3~219 (1989), University of Minnesota Press
- Shoemaker, S, "Time and cause : essays presented to Richard Taylor", pp.109~135 (1980), Reidel Pub. Co
- Strevens, M, "Bayesian Confirmation Theory: Inductive Logic, or Mere Inductive Framework", Synthese, 141, pp.365~379 (2004)