Validation of the Korean Version of the 15-Item Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in a College Population
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-15 item positive scale (CAPE-15) in college students. Methods This study had two stages: initial screening with self-report questionnaires including the CAPE-15, and semi-structured interviews to investigate the instrument’s diagnostic validity. The initial screening involved 1,749 college students. The modified Korean version of Prodromal Questionnaire-16 item (mKPQ-16) was also administered. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis in the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. Results Twelve of the interviewed subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest (0.936) for the CAPE-15 distress score (p<0.001). The use of 6 as the cutoff for the CAPE-15 distress score resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (85.2%), with a favorable positive predictive value of 32.4%. The coefficients of correlation between the CAPE-15 and mKPQ-16 were significant. Conclusion The Korean version of the CAPE-15 is a good instrument for screening for psychosis risk in collegiate settings. The validation of this scale could contribute to the early identification of psychosis in the Korean community.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-15 item positive scale (CAPE-15) in college students. Methods This study had two stages: initial screening with self-report questionnaires including the CAPE-15, and semi-structured interviews to investigate the instrument’s diagnostic validity. The initial screening involved 1,749 college students. The modified Korean version of Prodromal Questionnaire-16 item (mKPQ-16) was also administered. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis in the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. Results Twelve of the interviewed subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest (0.936) for the CAPE-15 distress score (p<0.001). The use of 6 as the cutoff for the CAPE-15 distress score resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (85.2%), with a favorable positive predictive value of 32.4%. The coefficients of correlation between the CAPE-15 and mKPQ-16 were significant. Conclusion The Korean version of the CAPE-15 is a good instrument for screening for psychosis risk in collegiate settings. The validation of this scale could contribute to the early identification of psychosis in the Korean community.
참고문헌 (31)
- Yung AR, "Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis", Schizophr Bull, 22, pp.283~303 (1996)
- American-Psychiatric-Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder" (2013), American Psychiatric Publishing
- Nelson B, "Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk("prodromal")for psychosis : the PACE 400 study", JAMA Psychiatry, 70, pp.793~802 (2013)
- Ju-Yeon Lee, "School Counselors’ Recognition of the Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 15(3), pp.320~324 (2018), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Addington J, "Screening tools for clinical high risk for psychosis", Early Interv Psychiatry, 9, pp.345~356 (2015)
- Chung YC, "Validation of the Korean version of the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory as a screening measure to detect adolescents at ultra-high risk for psychosis", Early Interv Psychiatry, 7, pp.71~79 (2013)
- Sung-Wan Kim, "Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 15(2), pp.111~117 (2018), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Ising HK, "The validity of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire(PQ-16)to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population", Schizophr Bull, 38, pp.1288~1296 (2012)
- Loewy RL, "Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire--brief version(PQB)", Schizophr Res, 129, pp.42~46 (2011)
- Young Eun Jang, "Validation of the Korean Version of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version in Non-Help-Seeking Individuals", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 16(2), pp.109~114 (2019), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Mass R, "Introducing the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory(ESI)as a psychometric method for schizotypy research", Pers Individ Dif, 42, pp.525~534 (2007)
- Capra C, "Brief screening for psychosislike experiences", Schizophr Res, 149, pp.104~107 (2013)
- Fusar-Poli P, "Towards a standard psychometric diagnostic interview for subjects at ultra high risk of psychosis : CAARMS versus SIPS", Psychiatry J, 2016, pp.7146341~ (2016)
- Stefanis NC, "Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population", Psychol Med, 32, pp.347~358 (2002)
- Bukenaite A, "Usefulness of the CAPE-P15 for detecting people at ultra-high risk for psychosis : Psychometric properties and cut-off values", Schizophr Res, 189, pp.69~74 (2017)
- Núñez D, "Internal structure of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-Positive(CAPE-P15)scale : evidence for a general factor", Schizophr Res, 165, pp.236~242 (2015)
- Perez J, "Common mental disorder including psychotic experiences : trailblazing a new recovery pathway within the improving access to psychological therapies programme in England", Early Interv Psychiatry, 12, pp.497~504 (2018)
- Chung YC, "What factors are related to delayed treatment in individuals at high risk for psychosis", Early Interv Psychiatry, 4, pp.124~131 (2010)
- Han C, "Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Korean version in the elderly population : the Ansan Geriatric study", Compr Psychiatry, 49, pp.218~223 (2008)
- Spitzer RL, "Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire", JAMA, 282, pp.1737~1744 (1999)
- O’Toole BI, "Screening for low prevalence disorders", Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 34(Suppl), pp.S39~S46 (2000)
- Owoso A, "Validation of a modified version of the PRIME screen for psychosis-risk symptoms in a non-clinical Kenyan youth sample", Compr Psychiatry, 55, pp.380~387 (2014)
- Loewy RL, "Self-report of attenuated psychotic experiences in a college population", Schizophr Res, 93, pp.144~151 (2007)
- Post SG, "Preventing schizophrenia and Alzheimer disease : comparative ethics", Schizophr Res, 51, pp.103~108 (2001)
- Kim SW, "Are current labeling terms suitable for people who are at risk of psychosis", Schizophr Res, 188, pp.172~177 (2017)
- Moritz S, "Do depressive symptoms predict paranoia or vice versa", J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 56, pp.113~121 (2017)
- Kline ER, "Depression and clinical high-risk states : Baseline presentation of depressed vs. non-depressed participants in the NAPLS-2 cohort", Schizophr Res, 192, pp.357~363 (2018)
- Fusar-Poli P, "Comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders in 509 individuals with an at-risk mental state : impact on psychopathology and transition to psychosis", Schizophr Bull, 40, pp.120~131 (2014)
- Morrison AP, "Cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultra-high risk: randomised controlled trial", Br J Psychiatry, 185, pp.291~297 (2004)
- 김성완, "Effects of Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Young Patients in the Early Stage of Psychosis", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 14(5), pp.609~617 (2017), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Schimmelmann BG, "Age matters in the prevalence and clinical significance of ultra-high-risk for psychosis symptoms and criteria in the general population : Findings from the BEAR and BEARS-kid studies", World Psychiatry, 14, pp.189~197 (2015)