Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in nonhelp- seeking university students. Methods Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. An exploratory modified version of the questionnaire (mKPQ-16), to which three items from the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory were added, was also used to compensate for items on thought and cognitive problems. Results Seventeen subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was highest for the mKPQ-16 total score (AUROC=0.831, p<0.001). The use of cutoff total scores of 7 for the mKPQ- 16 and 6 for the KPQ-16 resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (76.5% and 64.7%, respectively) and specificity (75.4% and 71.2%, respectively). Conclusion The Korean versions of the PQ-16 are good instruments for screening for psychosis risk in university students. This validation of a questionnaire version with a small number of items may make it feasible to screen large numbers of young adults in the community.
Abstract
Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in nonhelp- seeking university students. Methods Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. An exploratory modified version of the questionnaire (mKPQ-16), to which three items from the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory were added, was also used to compensate for items on thought and cognitive problems. Results Seventeen subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was highest for the mKPQ-16 total score (AUROC=0.831, p<0.001). The use of cutoff total scores of 7 for the mKPQ- 16 and 6 for the KPQ-16 resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (76.5% and 64.7%, respectively) and specificity (75.4% and 71.2%, respectively). Conclusion The Korean versions of the PQ-16 are good instruments for screening for psychosis risk in university students. This validation of a questionnaire version with a small number of items may make it feasible to screen large numbers of young adults in the community.
참고문헌 (40)
- McGorry PD, "Early intervention in psychotic disorders: detection and treatment of the first episode and the critical early stages", Med J Aust, 187(7 Suppl), pp.S8~S10 (2007)
- Addington J, "Duration of untreated psychosis in community treatment settings in the United States", Psychiatr Serv, 66, pp.753~756 (2015)[DOI]
- 김성완, "Effects of Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Young Patients in the Early Stage of Psychosis", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 14(5), pp.609~617 (2017), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Schimmelmann BG, "Impact of duration of untreated psychosis on pre-treatment, baseline, and outcome characteristics in an epidemiological first-episode psychosis cohort", J Psychiatr Res, 42, pp.982~990 (2008)[DOI]
- Kane JM, "Comprehensive versus usual community care for firstepisode psychosis: 2-year outcomes from the NIMH RAISE early treatment program", Am J Psychiatry, 173, pp.362~372 (2016)[DOI]
- 김성완, "Design and Methodology of the Korean Early Psychosis Cohort Study", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 14(1), pp.93~99 (2017), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Yoo J, "A study of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) for first episode psychosis", Ment Health, 2, pp.12~16 (2011)
- Hutton P, "Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Psychol Med, 44, pp.449~468 (2014)[DOI]
- Amminger GP, "Predictors of treatment response in young people at ultra-high risk for psychosis who received long-chain omega-3 fatty acids", Transl Psychiatry, 5, pp.e495~ (2015)[DOI]
- Yung AR, "Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis", Schizophr Bull, 22, pp.283~303 (1996)[DOI]
- Kim SW, "Relationship between erythrocyte fatty acid composition and psychopathology in the vienna omega-3 study", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0151417~ (2016)[DOI]
- Kim SW, "Relationship between membrane fatty acids and cognitive symptoms and information processing in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis", Schizophr Res, 158, pp.39~44 (2014)[DOI]
- Nelson B, "Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk (prodromal) for psychosis: the PACE 400 study", JAMA Psychiatry, 70, pp.793~802 (2013)[DOI]
- American Psychiatric-Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder. 5th Ed." (2013), American Psychiatric Publishing
- Yung AR, "Mapping the onset of psychosis: the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states", Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 39, pp.964~971 (2005)[DOI]
- Fusar-Poli P, "Towards a standard psychometric diagnostic interview for subjects at ultra high risk of psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS", Psychiatry J, 2016, pp.7146341~ (2016)
- Miller TJ, "Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability", Schizophr Bull, 29, pp.703~715 (2003)[DOI]
- Addington J, "Screening tools for clinical high risk for psychosis", Early Interv Psychiatry, 9, pp.345~356 (2015)[DOI]
- Chung YC, "Validation of the Korean version of the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory as a screening measure to detect adolescents at ultra-high risk for psychosis", Early Interv Psychiatry, 7, pp.71~79 (2013)[DOI]
- Ising HK, "The validity of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population", Schizophr Bull, 38, pp.1288~1296 (2012)[DOI]
- Loewy RL, "The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes", Schizophr Res, 79, pp.117~125 (2005)[DOI]
- Mass R, "Introducing the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (ESI) as a psychometric method for schizotypy research", Pers Individ Dif, 42, pp.525~534 (2007)[DOI]
- Loewy RL, "Prodromal psychosis screening in adolescent psychiatry clinics", Early Interv Psychiatry, 6, pp.69~75 (2012)[DOI]
- Sheehan DV, "The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10", J Clin Psychiatry, 59(Suppl 20), pp.22~33 (1998)
- Han C, "Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Korean version in the elderly population: the Ansan Geriatric study", Compr Psychiatry, 49, pp.218~223 (2008)[DOI]
- Spitzer RL, "Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire", JAMA, 282, pp.1737~1744 (1999)[DOI]
- Kobayashi H, "A self-reported instrument for prodromal symptoms of psychosis: testing the clinical validity of the PRIME Screen-Revised (PS-R) in a Japanese population", Schizophr Res, 106, pp.356~362 (2008)[DOI]
- Loewy RL, "Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire--brief version (PQ-B)", Schizophr Res, 129, pp.42~46 (2011)[DOI]
- Muller M, "The Self-screen-Prodrome as a short screening tool for pre-psychotic states", Schizophr Res, 123, pp.217~224 (2010)[DOI]
- Owoso A, "Validation of a modified version of the PRIME screen for psychosis-risk symptoms in a non-clinical Kenyan youth sample", Compr Psychiatry, 55, pp.380~387 (2014)[DOI]
- Loewy RL, "Self-report of attenuated psychotic experiences in a college population", Schizophr Res, 93, pp.144~151 (2007)[DOI]
- O'Toole BI, "Screening for low prevalence disorders", Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 34(Suppl), pp.S39~S46 (2000)[DOI]
- Post SG, "Preventing schizophrenia and Alzheimer disease: comparative ethics", Schizophr Res, 51, pp.103~108 (2001)[DOI]
- Kim SW, "Are current labeling terms suitable for people who are at risk of psychosis?", Schizophr Res, 188, pp.172~177 (2017)[DOI]
- Yang LH, "Stigma related to labels and symptoms in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis", Schizophr Res, 168, pp.9~15 (2015)[DOI]
- Escher S, "Independent course of childhood auditory hallucinations: a sequential 3-year follow-up study", Br J Psychiatry Suppl, 43, pp.s10~s18 (2002)
- Schimmelmann BG, "Age matters in the prevalence and clinical significance of ultra-high-risk for psychosis symptoms and criteria in the general population: Findings from the BEAR and BEARS-kid studies", World Psychiatry, 14, pp.189~197 (2015)[DOI]
- McGorry PD, "The prevalence of prodromal features of schizophrenia in adolescence: a preliminary survey", Acta Psychiatr Scand, 92, pp.241~249 (1995)[DOI]
- Fonseca-Pedrero E, "Assessing self-reported clinical high risk symptoms in community-derived adolescents: a psychometric evaluation of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief", Compr Psychiatry, 66, pp.201~208 (2016)[DOI]
- McGorry P, "Why We need a transdiagnostic staging approach to emerging psychopathology, early diagnosis, and treatment", JAMA Psychiatry, 73, pp.191~192 (2016)[DOI]
