Validation of the Korean Version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in General Population
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences has been widely translated and commonly used as a measure for psychotic experiences and psychosis proneness in clinical and research environments worldwide. This study aimed to establish the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) and factor structure of a Korean version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (K-CAPE) in the general population.Methods A total of 1,467 healthy participants completed K-CAPE and other psychiatric symptom-related scales (Paranoia scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Dissociative Experiences Scale-II, and Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences) via online survey. K-CAPE’s internal reliability was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to investigate whether the original three-factor model (positive, negative, and depressive) and other hypothesized multidimensional models (including positive and negative subfactors) were suitable for our data. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to explore better alternative factor solutions with a follow-up CFA. To assess convergent and discriminant validity, we examined correlations between KCAPE subscales with other established measures of psychiatric symptoms.Results K-CAPE showed good internal consistency in all original three subscales (all greater than α=0.827). The CFA demonstrated that the multidimensional models exhibited relatively better quality than the original three-dimensional model. Although the model fit indices did not reach their respective optimal thresholds, they were within an acceptable range. Results from the EFA indicated 3–5 factor solutions. In 3-factor solution, “negative-avolition” items were founded to be loaded more consistently with depressive items than with the negative dimension. In 4-factor solution, positive items were divided into two subfactors: “positive-bizarre experiences” and “positive-delusional thoughts,” while negative symptoms were separated into two distinct subfactors in 5-factor solution: “negative-avolition (expressive),” and “negative-social (experiential).” The correlation coefficients between K-CAPE subscales and corresponding measurements were significant (p<0.001), confirming the convergent and discriminant validity.Conclusion Our study provides evidence to support the reliability and validity of the K-CAPE and its use as a measure of psychotic symptoms in the Korean population. Although alternative factor structures did not improve the model fit, our EFA findings implicate the use of subfactors to investigate more specific domains of positive and negative symptoms. Given the heterogeneous nature of psychotic symptoms, this may be useful in capturing their different underlying mechanisms.
Abstract
Objective The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences has been widely translated and commonly used as a measure for psychotic experiences and psychosis proneness in clinical and research environments worldwide. This study aimed to establish the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) and factor structure of a Korean version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (K-CAPE) in the general population.Methods A total of 1,467 healthy participants completed K-CAPE and other psychiatric symptom-related scales (Paranoia scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Dissociative Experiences Scale-II, and Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences) via online survey. K-CAPE’s internal reliability was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to investigate whether the original three-factor model (positive, negative, and depressive) and other hypothesized multidimensional models (including positive and negative subfactors) were suitable for our data. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to explore better alternative factor solutions with a follow-up CFA. To assess convergent and discriminant validity, we examined correlations between KCAPE subscales with other established measures of psychiatric symptoms.Results K-CAPE showed good internal consistency in all original three subscales (all greater than α=0.827). The CFA demonstrated that the multidimensional models exhibited relatively better quality than the original three-dimensional model. Although the model fit indices did not reach their respective optimal thresholds, they were within an acceptable range. Results from the EFA indicated 3–5 factor solutions. In 3-factor solution, “negative-avolition” items were founded to be loaded more consistently with depressive items than with the negative dimension. In 4-factor solution, positive items were divided into two subfactors: “positive-bizarre experiences” and “positive-delusional thoughts,” while negative symptoms were separated into two distinct subfactors in 5-factor solution: “negative-avolition (expressive),” and “negative-social (experiential).” The correlation coefficients between K-CAPE subscales and corresponding measurements were significant (p<0.001), confirming the convergent and discriminant validity.Conclusion Our study provides evidence to support the reliability and validity of the K-CAPE and its use as a measure of psychotic symptoms in the Korean population. Although alternative factor structures did not improve the model fit, our EFA findings implicate the use of subfactors to investigate more specific domains of positive and negative symptoms. Given the heterogeneous nature of psychotic symptoms, this may be useful in capturing their different underlying mechanisms.
참고문헌 (56)
- Stefanis NC, "Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population", Psychol Med, 32, pp.347~358 (2002)
- Rössler W, "Psychotic experiences in the general population : a twenty-year prospective community study", Schizophr Res, 92, pp.1~14 (2007)
- Yung AR, "Psychotic-like experiences in nonpsychotic help-seekers : associations with distress, depression, and disability", Schizophr Bull, 32, pp.352~359 (2006)
- Linscott RJ, "An updated and conservative systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence on psychotic experiences in children and adults : on the pathway from proneness to persistence to dimensional expression across mental disorders", Psychol Med, 43, pp.1133~1149 (2013)
- Bourgin J, "Prevalence and correlates of psychotic-like experiences in the general population", Schizophr Res, 215, pp.371~377 (2020)
- Yung AR, "Psychotic-like experiences in a community sample of adolescents : implications for the continuum model of psychosis and prediction of schizophrenia", Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 43, pp.118~128 (2009)
- McGrath JJ, "Psychotic experiences in the general population : a cross-national analysis based on 31 261 respondents from 18 countries", JAMA Psychiatry, 72, pp.697~705 (2015)
- van Os J, "A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum : evidence for a psychosis proneness-persistence-impairment model of psychotic disorder", Psychol Med, 39, pp.179~195 (2009)
- Yung AR, "Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group : psychopathology and clinical features", Schizophr Res, 67, pp.131~142 (2004)
- DeRosse P, "Examining the psychosis continuum", Curr Behav Neurosci Rep, 2, pp.80~89 (2015)
- Kaymaz N, "Do subthreshold psychotic experiences predict clinical outcomes in unselected non-help-seeking population-based samples? A systematic review and meta-analysis, enriched with new results", Psychol Med, 42, pp.2239~2253 (2012)
- van Os J, "Introduction : the extended psychosis phenotype--relationship with schizophrenia and with ultrahigh risk status for psychosis", Schizophr Bull, 38, pp.227~230 (2012)
- Mark W, "Psychometric properties of"Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences" : review and meta-analyses", Schizophr Bull, 42, pp.34~44 (2016)
- Yung AR, "The prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis : past and current conceptualizations", Schizophr Bull, 22, pp.353~370 (1996)
- Yung AR, "Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis", Schizophr Bull, 22, pp.283~303 (1996)
- American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" (2013), American Psychiatric Association
- Joa I, "Primary prevention of psychosis through interventions in the symptomatic prodromal phase, a pragmatic Norwegian Ultra High Risk study", BMC Psychiatry, 15, pp.89~ (2015)
- Power P, "Analysis of the initial treatment phase in first-episode psychosis", Br J Psychiatry Suppl, 172, pp.71~76 (1998)
- Bashir Z, "Recognition and management of depression in early psychosis", BJPsych Bull, 46, pp.83~89 (2022)
- Yung AR, "Mapping the onset of psychosis : the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states", Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 39, pp.964~971 (2005)
- Palmier-Claus JE, "The feasibility and validity of ambulatory self-report of psychotic symptoms using a smartphone software application", BMC Psychiatry, 12, pp.172~ (2012)
- Pignon B, "A latent class analysis of psychotic symptoms in the general population", Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 52, pp.573~584 (2018)
- Varghese D, "Correlates of delusion-like experiences in a non-psychotic community sample", Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 42, pp.505~508 (2008)
- Schlier B, "The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences measures nine clusters of psychosis-like experiences : a validation of the German version of the CAPE", Schizophr Res, 169, pp.274~279 (2015)
- Mark W, "Validation of the Chinese version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences(CAPE)in an adolescent general population", Asian J Psychiatr, 26, pp.58~65 (2017)
- Fonseca-Pedrero E, "Validation of the community assessment psychic experiences-42(CAPE-42)in Spanish college students and patients with psychosis", Actas Esp Psiquiatr, 40, pp.169~176 (2012)
- Konings M, "Validity and reliability of the CAPE : a self-report instrument for the measurement of psychotic experiences in the general population", Acta Psychiatr Scand, 114, pp.55~61 (2006)
- Stip E, "Psychotic symptoms as a continuum between normality and pathology", Can J Psychiatry, 54, pp.140~151 (2009)
- Sung-Wan Kim, "Validation of the Korean Version of the 15-Item Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in a College Population", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 17(4), pp.306~311 (2020), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Yung AR, "The initial prodrome in psychosis : descriptive and qualitative aspects", Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 30, pp.587~599 (1996)
- Gourzis P, "Symptomatology of the initial prodromal phase in schizophrenia", Schizophr Bull, 28, pp.415~429 (2002)
- Shioiri T, "Early prodromal symptoms and diagnoses before first psychotic episode in 219 inpatients with schizophrenia", Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 61, pp.348~354 (2007)
- Carlson EB, "An update on the dissociative experiences scale", Dissociation : Prog Dissociative Disord, 6, pp.16~27 (1993)
- Oh HY, "Reliability and validity of the Dissociative Experiences Scale among South Korean patients with schizophrenia", J Trauma Dissociation, 16, pp.577~591 (2015)
- Fenigstein A, "Paranoia and self-consciousness", J Pers Soc Psychol, 62, pp.129~138 (1992)
- Lee HJ, "A study of the reliability and the validity of the paranoia scale", Korean J Clin Psychol, 14, pp.83~94 (1995)
- Kroenke K, "The PHQ-9 : validity of a brief depression severity measure", J Gen Intern Med, 16, pp.606~613 (2001)
- 박승진, "한글판 우울증 선별도구(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)의 신뢰도와 타당도", 대한불안의학회지, 6(2), pp.119~124 (2010), 대한불안의학회
- Rosseel Y, "lavaan : an R package for structural equation modeling", J Stat Softw, 48, pp.1~36 (2012)
- Capra C, "Brief screening for psychosislike experiences", Schizophr Res, 149, pp.104~107 (2013)
- Wigman JT, "Replication of the five-dimensional structure of positive psychotic experiences in young adulthood", Psychiatry Res, 197, pp.353~355 (2012)
- "Measuring model fit"[URL]
- Xia Y, "RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data : the story they tell depends on the estimation methods", Behav Res Methods, 51, pp.409~428 (2019)
- Kenny DA, "The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom", Sociol Methods Res, 44, pp.486~507 (2015)
- George D, "IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: a simple guide and reference" (2019), Routledge
- Brenner K, "Validation of the English and French versions of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences(CAPE)with a Montreal community sample", Schizophr Res, 95, pp.86~95 (2007)
- Vleeschouwer M, "Does assessment type matter? A measurement invariance analysis of online and paper and pencil assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE)", PLoS One, 9, pp.e84011~ (2014)
- Krynicki CR, "The relationship between negative symptoms and depression in schizophrenia : a systematic review", Acta Psychiatr Scand, 137, pp.380~390 (2018)
- Murali T, "Symptoms of depression in schizophrenia", Indian J Med Res, 127, pp.516~518 (2008)
- Sax KW, "Relationships among negative, positive, and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia and psychotic depression", Br J Psychiatry, 168, pp.68~71 (1996)
- Richter J, "Measurement of negative and depressive symptoms : discriminatory relevance of affect and expression", Eur Psychiatry, 55, pp.23~28 (2019)
- Orth U, "Low self-esteem is a risk factor for depressive symptoms from young adulthood to old age", J Abnorm Psychol, 118, pp.472~478 (2009)
- Orth U, "Understanding the link between low self-esteem and depression", Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 22, pp.455~460 (2013)
- Jaya ES, "Confirmatory factor analysis of the Indonesian version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences", Makara Hum Behav Stud Asia, 21, pp.1~12 (2017)
- Vermeiden M, "Cultural differences in positive psychotic experiences assessed with the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-42(CAPE-42) : a comparison of student populations in the Netherlands, Nigeria and Norway", BMC Psychiatry, 19, pp.244~ (2019)
- Ragazzi TCC, "Validation of the Portuguese version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences and characterization of psychotic experiences in a Brazilian sample", Braz J Psychiatry, 42, pp.389~397 (2020)