본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산연협력성공가능성에 영향을 미치는 공공연구기관 연구자 특성과 협력환경의 결합효과 분석

The Combined Effect of Researcher Characteristics and Cooperative Environment Affecting the Success Possibility of Industry-Public Research Institutes Cooperation

성을현|황경연
대한경영정보학회 (Daehan Academy Of Management Information Systems)|2022.06|경영과 정보연구 (Management & Information Systems Review)|제41권 제2호|pp. 149-173|DOI 10.29214/damis.2022.41.2.009

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

기술사업화역량Technology commercialization capability창의적 자기효능감Creative self-efficacySocial orientation산연협력사회적 지향성산연협력시스템적합성Industry-public research institutes cooperationCooperation system suitability
주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구는 공공연구기관 연구자의 개인 특성과 산연협력환경이 상호작용을 통해 산연협력성공가능성에 미치는 영향을 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 기존 문헌에서 연구자 개인 특성과 협력환경이 산연협력성공가능성에 영향을 미치는 요인을 탐색하고, 이들 요인을 중심으로 개념적 연구모형을 제안하였다. 본 연구에서는 연구자 개인 특성으로 사회적 지향성, 창의적 자기효능감 및 기술사업화역량을 사용하였으며, 협력환경으로 산연협력시스템적합성을 사용하였다. 이 요인들이 결합하여 산연협력성공가능성에 영향을 미치는 관계를 분석하기 위한 자료는 대덕연구개발특구 공공연구기관 연구자를 대상으로 수행된 설문조사를 통해 수집되었다. 설문조사를 통해 분석 가능한 114명의 응답 자료가 회수되었다. 자료분석에는 퍼지집합질적비교분석(fsQCA) 방법이 활용되었다. fsQCA 결과에서 공공연구기관 연구자의 산연협력성공가능성을 결정하는 3개의 솔루션이 도출되었다. 첫 번째 솔루션은 연구자의 사회적 지향성이 높고, 산연협력시스템이 산연협력에 적합할 때 산연협력성공가능성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 두 번째 솔루션은 공공연구기관 연구자가 높은 사회적 지향성과 창의적 자기효능감을 갖고 있고, 높은 기술사업화역량을 보유하고 있을 때 산연협력성공가능성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 세 번째 솔루션은 공공연구기관 연구자의 창의적 자기효능감 및 기술사업화역량이 낮지만 사회적 지향성이 높으면 산연협력성공가능성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 공공연구기관 연구자 관점에서 fsQCA 방법을 통해 연구자 개인 특성과 산연협력시스템적합성이 결합하여 산연협력성공가능성에 미치는 효과를 밝혀 산연협력 촉진을 위한 정책적 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of public research institute researcher characteristics and cooperative environment on the success possibility of cooperation through interaction in industry-public research institutes (I-PRIs) cooperation. The factors that researcher characteristics and cooperative environment have on the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation were explored through the existing literature review, and a conceptual research model was proposed focusing on these factors. In this study, social orientation, creative self-efficacy, and technology commercialization capability were used as the researcher characteristics factors, and cooperation system suitability was used as the cooperative environment factor. Data to analyze the combinatorial relationship between these factors affecting the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation were collected through a survey conducted on researchers from public research institutes in Daedeok Innopolis. In the survey, 114 responses were collected that could be analyzed. A fuzzy set qualitative comparison analysis (fsQCA) method was used for data analysis. From the results of fsQCA, three solutions were derived that determine the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation. The first solution showed a high possibility of success of I-PRIs cooperation when the social orientation of researchers was high and the cooperative system was suitable for cooperation. In the second solution, when researchers have high social orientation and creative self-efficacy, and high technology commercialization capability, the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation is high. The third solution showed that the researcher's creative self-efficacy and technology commercialization capability were low, but the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation was high when the social orientation was high.

참고문헌 (75)

  1. 강기찬, "기술지원 정책이 중소기업의 기술역량에 미치는 영향: 산학연 협력의 매개효과", 전략경영연구, 23(2), pp.47~64 (2020), 한국전략경영학회[DOI]
  2. 강석민, "R&D 자원, R&D 협력, 정책지원 및 운영성과의 구조적 관계에 대한 연구 —국내 보건산업 클러스터를 중심으로—", 경영과 정보연구, 38(2), pp.225~240 (2019), 대한경영정보학회[DOI]
  3. 박정민, "기업의 기술과 시장지향성이 기술협력 및 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 경영과 정보연구, 35(2), pp.205~220 (2016), 대한경영정보학회[DOI]
  4. 황경연, "기업과 출연(연)간 관계특성 및 협력성과 결정요인 분석", 경영과 정보연구, 38(2), pp.119~137 (2019), 대한경영정보학회[DOI]
  5. 황경연, "산학연협력을 통한 기업의 혁신성과에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 - 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로 -", 경영과 정보연구, 39(4), pp.61~77 (2020), 대한경영정보학회[DOI]
  6. Mostafa A. Ali, "A Multidimensional View of Intellectual Capital: The Impact on Innovation Performance", Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(4), pp.216~ (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Alpkan, L., "Organizational Support for Intrapreneurship and its Interaction with Human Capital to Enhance Innovative Performance", Management decision, 48(5), pp.732~755 (2010)
  8. Arshed, N., "Spatial Temporal Exploration of Factors Motivating Academia-Industry Collaboration", Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, pp.521~540 (2022)
  9. Arvanitis, S., "University-Industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer in Switzerland : What University Scientists Think about Co-operation with Private Enterprises", Research Policy, 37(10), pp.1865~1883 (2008)
  10. Aupperle, K. E., "An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability", Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), pp.446~463 (1985)
  11. Bandura, A., "The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-Efficacy Theory", Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), pp.359~373 (1986)
  12. Brogaard, L., "The Impact of Innovation Training on Successful Outcomes in Public-Private Partnerships", Public Management Review, 19(8), pp.1184~1205 (2017)
  13. Bronnenmayer, M., "Determinants of Perceived Success in Management Consulting : An Empirical Investigation from the Consultant Perspective", Management Research Review, 39(6), pp.706~738 (2016)
  14. Cabrilo, S., "Study on Human Capital Gaps for Effective Innovation Strategies in the Knowledge Era", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(3), pp.411~429 (2014)
  15. Caerteling, J., "Technology Commercialization in Road Infrastructure : How Government Affects the Variation and Appropriability of Technology", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, pp.143~161 (2008)
  16. Daniel Catalá-Pérez, "The Demola model as a public policy tool boosting collaboration in innovation: A comparative study between Finland and Spain", Technology in Society, 63, pp.101358~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  17. Chen, C. J., "Technology Commercialization, Incubator and Venture Capital, and New Venture Performance", Journal of Business Research, 62(1), pp.93~103 (2009)
  18. Cruz-Ros, S., "Absorptive Capacity and Its Impact on Innovation and Performance : Findings from SEM and fsQCA", Review of Managerial Science, 15, pp.235~249 (2021)
  19. Bojan Ćudić, "Factors impacting university–industry collaboration in European countries", Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1) (2022), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  20. Darzi, M. A., "Personnel Capability and Customer Satisfaction as Predictors of Customer Retention in the Banking Sector : A Mediated-Moderation Study", International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(4), pp.663~679 (2018)
  21. Döring, T., "What Do We Know about Geographical Knowledge Spillovers and Regional Growth? : A Survey of the Literature", Regional Studies, 40(3), pp.375~395 (2006)
  22. Drazin, R., "Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations : A Sensemaking Perspective", Academy of Management Review, 24, pp.286~307 (1999)
  23. Dul, J., "Necessary Condition Analysis(NCA)Logic and Methodology of"Necessary but not Sufficient"Causality", Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), pp.10~52 (2016)
  24. Edvinsson, L., "Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by finding its Hidden Brainpower" (1997), Harper Collins Publishers Inc
  25. Maryann P. Feldman, "Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation", Handbook of The Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1, pp.381~410 (2010), Elsevier[DOI]
  26. Fiss, P. C., "Building better Causal Theories : A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research", The Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), pp.393~420 (2011)
  27. Fornell, C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  28. Franco, M., "UniversityIndustry Cooperation : Researchers’ Motivations and Interaction Channels", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 36, pp.41~51 (2015)
  29. João Augusto Ferreira Freire, "Cooperation in Innovative Efforts: a Systematic Literature Review", Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(4), pp.3364~3400 (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  30. Greenley, G. E., "External Moderation of Association among Stakeholder Orientation and Company Performance", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, pp.51~69 (1988)
  31. Guerrero, M., "Entrepreneurial Universities in two European Regions : A Case Study Comparison", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), pp.415~434 (2014)
  32. Gur, F. A., "Executive Antecedents of Interfirm Cooperation", Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 37(3), pp.300~314 (2020)
  33. Hair, J. F., "Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)" (2017), Sage Publications
  34. Henseler, J., "A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), pp.115~135 (2015)
  35. Hillebrand, B., "The Relationship between Internal and External Cooperation", Journal of Business Research, 56(9), pp.735~743 (2003)
  36. Jiang, W., "Leader Creativity Expectations Motivate Employee Creativity : A Moderated Mediation Examination", The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), pp.724~749 (2017)
  37. Jin, Z., "Empirical Research on Private Entrepreneur Human Capital in China and Enterprises'Growth Performance : A Comparative Analysis between High Tech Enterprises and Traditional Enterprises", Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 2(2), pp.175~195 (2010)
  38. Karaveg, C., "R&D Commercialization Capability Criteria : Implications for Project Selection", Journal of Management Development, 35(3), pp.304~325 (2016)
  39. Kirchberger, M. A., "Technology Commercialization : A Literature Review of Success Factors and Antecedents across Different Contexts", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, pp.1077~1112 (2016)
  40. Konga, S., "A Study of Primary School Students'Interest, Collaboration Attitude, and Programming Empowerment in Computational Thinking Education", Computers and Education, 127, pp.178~189 (2018)
  41. Li, C., "Within-person Relationship between Creative Self-efficacy and Individual Creativity : The Mediator of Creative Process Engagement and the Moderator of Regulatory Focus", Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), pp.63~78 (2021)
  42. Lim, J. -S., "Market Orientation, Innovation Commercialization Capability and Firm Performance Relationships : The Moderating Role of Supply Chain Influence", Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 32(7), pp.913~924 (2017)
  43. Mair, J., "Social Entrepreneurship Research : A Source Of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight", Journal of World Business, 41(1), pp.36~44 (2006)
  44. Marinho, A., "Why Most University-Industry Partnerships Fail to Endure and How to Create Value and Gain Competitive Advantage through Collaboration : A Systematic Review", Quality Innovation Prosperity, 24(2), pp.34~50 (2020)
  45. McCormick, B. W., "Proactive Personality and Proactive Behaviour : Perspectives on Person-situation Interactions", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), pp.30~51 (2019)
  46. Mindruta, D., "Value Creation in University-Firm Research Collaborations : A Matching Approach", Strategic Management Journal, 34, pp.644~665 (2013)
  47. Mitchell, W., "Survival of Businesses Using Collaborative Relationships to Commercialize Complex Goods", Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), pp.169~195 (1996)
  48. Myoken, Y., "The Role of Geographical Proximity in University and Industry Collaboration : Case Study of Japanese Companies in the UK", International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 12(1), pp.43~61 (2013)
  49. Nauta, A., "Social Value Orientation, Organizational Goal Concerns and Interdepartmental Problem-Solving Behavior", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, pp.199~213 (2002)
  50. Nevens, T. M., "Commercializing Technology : What the Best Companies Do", Planning Review, 18(6), pp.20~24 (1990)
  51. Newman, A., "The Effects of Employees' Creative Self-Efficacy on Innovative Behavior : The Role of Entrepreneurial Leadership", Journal of Business Research, 89, pp.1~9 (2018)
  52. Onjewu, A. -K. E., "Universities and Entrepreneurship: Meeting the Educational and Social Challenges(Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, Vol. 11)", pp.199~218 (2021), Emerald Publishing Limited
  53. Ilias O. Pappas, "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing", International Journal of Information Management, 58, pp.102310~ (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  54. Pinto, E. B., "Collaborative R&D the Key Cooperation Domain for University-Industry Partnerships Sustainability : Position Paper", Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp.102~109 (2021)
  55. Pletzer, J. L., "Social Value Orientation, Expectations, and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas : A Meta–Analysis", European Journal of Personality, 32(1), pp.62~83 (2018)
  56. Podsakoff, P. M., "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research : A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp.879~903 (2003)
  57. Ragin, C. C., "Set Relations in Social Research : Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage", Political Analysis, 14(3), pp.291~310 (2006)
  58. Ragin, C. C., "Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond" (2008), University of Chicago Press
  59. "SmartPLS 3, SmartPLS GmbH:Boenningstedt" (2015)[URL]
  60. Rodríguez, M. J., "Innovation in Social Economy Firms", Management Decision, 51(5), pp.986~998 (2013)
  61. Selma C. Rudert, "Stay out of our office (vs. our pub): Target personality and situational context affect ostracism intentions", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, pp.104142~ (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  62. Rybnicek, R., "What makes Industry–University Collaboration Succeed? A Systematic Review of the Literature", Journal of Business Economics, 89, pp.221~250 (2019)
  63. Schneider, M. R., "Mapping the Institutional Capital of High-Tech Firms : A Fuzzy-Set Analysis of Capitalist Variety and Export Performance", Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), pp.246~266 (2010)
  64. Schofield, T., "Critical Success Factors for Knowledge Transfer Collaborations between University and Industry", The Journal of Research Administration, 44, pp.38~56 (2013)
  65. Supriatna, M. D., "The Role of Creative Self-Efficacy to Increase Researcher’s Innovative Behavior", International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(9), pp.846~859 (2019)
  66. Le Tang, "How does leader self-deprecating humor affect creative performance? The role of creative self-efficacy and power distance", Finance Research Letters, 42, pp.102344~ (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  67. Tett, R. P., "A Personality Trait–Based Interactionist Model of Job Performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp.500~517 (2003)
  68. Tierney, P., "Creative Self-Efficacy : Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance", Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp.1137~1148 (2002)
  69. Urueña, A., "Understanding Workers' Adoption of Productivity Mobile Applications : A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis(fsQCA)", Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), pp.967~981 (2018)
  70. Van Andel, C. E. E., "Donor Registration, College Major, and Prosociality : Differences Among Students of Economics, Medicine and Psychology", Personality and Individual Differences, 94, pp.277~283 (2016)
  71. Van Lange, P. A. M., "The Psychology of Social Dilemmas : A Review", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), pp.125~141 (2013)
  72. Woodside, A. G., "Moving beyond Multiple Regression Analysis to Algorithms : Calling for Adoption of a Paradigm Shift from Symmetric to Asymmetric Thinking in Data Analysis and Crafting Theory", Journal of Business Research, 66(4), pp.463~472 (2013)
  73. Yanyan Qi, "Empathy or schadenfreude? Social value orientation and affective responses to gambling results", Personality and Individual Differences, 153, pp.109619~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  74. Zhiyan Zhao, "Individual Differences, Self-Efficacy, and Chinese Scientists’ Industry Engagement", Information, 8(4), pp.160~ (2017), MDPI AG[DOI]
  75. Zheng, L., "Qualitative Comparative Analysis : Configurational Paths to Innovation Performance", Journal of Business Research, 128, pp.83~93 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

퍼지집합 질적 비교분석을 활용한 공공연구기관 연구자의 산연협력 행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석성을현, 황경연대한경영정보학회 · 경영과 정보연구2021 · 제40권 제2호대덕연구개발특구 정부출연연연구기관 연구자의 산연협력 혁신성과 결정요인 분석: 퍼지집합 질적 비교분석 접근성을현, 황경연한국융합학회 · 한국융합학회논문지2021 · 제12권 제7호공공연구기관 연구자의 창업성공가능성에 미치는 영향 요인: PLS와 fsQCA 활용성을현, 황경연한국벤처창업학회 · 벤처창업연구2022 · 제17권 제1호기업과 출연(연)간 관계특성 및 협력성과 결정요인 분석황경연대한경영정보학회 · 경영과 정보연구2019 · 제38권 제2호기업-정부출연(연) 간 협력과 기업성과에 영향을 미치는 요인성을현, 황경연대한경영정보학회 · 경영과 정보연구2018 · 제37권 제3호산연협력 활성화 요인의 상대적 중요도에 관한 연구신현호, 이민규한국혁신학회 · 한국혁신학회지2024 · 제19권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

플랫폼 기반 공유경제 서비스 성과요인의 선행요인에 관한 개념적 접근조휘형pp. 1-19라이브커머스 인플루언서 특성과 구매의도의 관계에 관한 연구 - 중국 소비자를 대상으로 -김형준, 조홍pp. 21-39금융혁신과 거시경제성장김경수, 지상윤pp. 41-62모바일 광고 앱의 인지된 혜택 및 비용이 사용자 만족과 광고태도에 미치는 영향 -광고 앱 유형간 비교를 중심으로-정영수, 정철호, 전중원pp. 63-77서비스산업의 기업성과에 미치는 비기술혁신의 영향에 대한 연구: 성향점수매칭의 적용강석민pp. 79-94
원문 보기