본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공과대학생의 핵심역량 분석과 비교과 활동의 활용

Analysis of Core Competencies in Engineering Students and Utilization of Extracurricular Activities

황순희
한국공학교육학회 (Korean Society for Engineering Education)|2018.11|공학교육연구 (Journal of Engineering Education Research)|제21권 제6호|pp. 63-73|DOI 10.18108/jeer.2018.21.6.63

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Core CompetenciesK-CESAExtracurricular ActivitiesEngineering StudentsGPA(grade point average)Grades in major & liberal arts subject
주제분류학제간연구

초록

This research aims to analyze core competencies of engineering students in Korea as well as to explore the application plans of extracurricular activities(hereafter, ECA) and programs in order to enhance their core competencies. Participation in ECA has long been recognized as having positive benefits and impacts upon students. To achieve the purpose of this study, first, we investigated whether there were differences between core competencies in undergraduates according to majors, gender and grades. ‘Core competencies’, first introduced in management theory as ‘core competency' can be defined as personal attributes or underlining characteristics, capable of delivering a role or job. ‘Core competencies’ has received particular attention in recent years and there has been much related research (domestic and foreign) combined with diverse factors. However, few studies have addressed the question on engineering student’s core competencies as well as the ways of their enhancement. This study was conducted with a total of 286 students, and core competencies have been measured online, through K-CESA. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant differences in undergraduate students’ core competencies by majors. Engineering students scored significantly lower in core competencies overall. Second, there was no significant difference in students’ core competencies by gender and grade. Third, there was a significant correlation among components of core competencies. Finally, there was a significant correlation between core competencies and grades(GPA, grades in major subject & liberal arts subject), rather levels in the correlation were low. Furthermore, the study suggested that the appropriate application of extracurricular activities would enhance core competencies of students.

Abstract

This research aims to analyze core competencies of engineering students in Korea as well as to explore the application plans of extracurricular activities(hereafter, ECA) and programs in order to enhance their core competencies. Participation in ECA has long been recognized as having positive benefits and impacts upon students. To achieve the purpose of this study, first, we investigated whether there were differences between core competencies in undergraduates according to majors, gender and grades. ‘Core competencies’, first introduced in management theory as ‘core competency' can be defined as personal attributes or underlining characteristics, capable of delivering a role or job. ‘Core competencies’ has received particular attention in recent years and there has been much related research (domestic and foreign) combined with diverse factors. However, few studies have addressed the question on engineering student’s core competencies as well as the ways of their enhancement. This study was conducted with a total of 286 students, and core competencies have been measured online, through K-CESA. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant differences in undergraduate students’ core competencies by majors. Engineering students scored significantly lower in core competencies overall. Second, there was no significant difference in students’ core competencies by gender and grade. Third, there was a significant correlation among components of core competencies. Finally, there was a significant correlation between core competencies and grades(GPA, grades in major subject & liberal arts subject), rather levels in the correlation were low. Furthermore, the study suggested that the appropriate application of extracurricular activities would enhance core competencies of students.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 김안나, "대학생들의 핵심능력 개발에 영향을 미치는개인 및 환경 요인 분석", 한국교육, 30(1), pp.367~392 (2003), 한국교육개발원
  2. 김정민, "대학의 비교과 활동에 대한 연구 분석과 시사점", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(17), pp.773~791 (2017), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  3. 남창우, "대학생의 계열 및 학년별 비인지적 핵심역량 차이 분석: 자기관리 역량 및 대인관계 역량을 중심으로", 사고개발, 12(3), pp.91~118 (2016), 대한사고개발학회
  4. 문성동, "대학에서 비교과영역의 만족요인에 관한 연구", 한국경영공학회지, 20(1), pp.147~160 (2015), 한국경영공학회
  5. 백승희, "대학생 역량진단 도구의 성별과 학년에 따른 구인동등성 검증 및 잠재평균분석", 교육방법연구, 27(3), pp.349~373 (2015), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
  6. 백평구, "대학생 핵심역량 수준과 대학생 개인 변인의 관계 및 특성", 교양교육연구, 7(3), pp.349~387 (2013), 한국교양교육학회
  7. 오윤나, "성인학습자의 핵심역량 개발에 대한 인식 및 요구조사", 석사, 교육학, pp.2006
  8. 유지원, "자연과학계열 대학생의 비교과활동 참여와 구성원과의 상호작용이 팀웍역량에 미치는 영향", 교육과학연구, 47(2), pp.153~178 (2016), 교육과학연구소[DOI]
  9. 유현숙, "대학생의 의사소통능력 및 종합적 사고력에 영향을 주는 학습과정 요인 분석", 교육행정학연구, 29(4), pp.319~337 (2011), 한국교육행정학회
  10. 이경희, "공과대학 신입생의 핵심역량 인식수준을 통한 공학교육방향 연구", 공학교육연구, 13(6), pp.57~71 (2010), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  11. 이보경, "쌍방향(In", Out Bound) 국제화를 지향한 대학의 교육실태와 비교과과정에 관한 연구, 2012, pp.6(4), 463~492[DOI]
  12. 이은경, "대학생의 성격유형과 K-CESA 비인지적 핵심역량의 관계 분석", 핵심역량교육연구, 1(1), pp.25~46 (2016)
  13. 이장익, "대학입학 전형제도 유형과 대학생 핵심역량에 대한 연구", 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 44(2), pp.73~96 (2012), 한국농·산업교육학회[DOI]
  14. 이장익, "대학생의 핵심역량과 학업성취도 관계성에 대한 분석연구", 직업교육연구, 31(2), pp.227~246 (2012), 한국직업교육학회[DOI]
  15. 장상필, "비교과 교육을 통한 융합적 사고력 증진 방안 연구: 대학생의 다문화 수용성, 인문학적 소양을 중심으로", 교육종합연구, 13(4), pp.135~156 (2015), 교육종합연구원
  16. 진미석, "대학생 핵심역량 진단체제 구축 방안 연구", 교육행정학연구, 29(4), pp.461~486 (2011), 한국교육행정학회
  17. 최진영, "비교과과정 운영 사례 조사 및 운영방안 도출에 관한 연구", 공학교육연구, 14(4), pp.69~77 (2011), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  18. 한안나, "대구가톨릭대학교 교과-비교과 교육과정 통합관리 시스템 구축 및 운영", 문화와융합, 39(6), pp.171~202 (2017), 한국문화융합학회[DOI]
  19. 한국교육개발원, "한국 대학생의 학습과정 분석연구(I)" (2010), 한국교육개발원
  20. 황순희, "PBL 기반 <토의> 수업 모형의 구현과 평가: 부산대학교 수업개발 사례를 중심으로", 공학교육연구, 14(4), pp.88~96 (2011), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  21. 황순희, "언어사용역을 활용한 공학 텍스트의 탐색과 분석", 인문언어, 20(1), pp.29~55 (2018), 국제언어인문학회[DOI]
  22. 황지원, "공학계열 대학생들의 교과목 성적과 K-CESA 핵심역량의 관계 분석", 공학교육연구, 19(4), pp.35~46 (2016), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  23. 황지원, "대학생들의 개인 배경변인에 따른 핵심역량 차이분석: K-CESA 진단 결과를 중심으로: K-CESA 진단 결과를 중심으로", 핵심역량교육연구, 2(1), pp.107~123 (2017)
  24. Bakoban, R. A., "Extracurricular activities and their effect on the student's grade point average:statistical study", Educational Research and Reviews, 10(2), pp.2737~2744 (2015)
  25. Bartkus, K. R., "Clarifying the meaning of extracurricular activity : A literature review of definitions", American Journal of Business Education, 5(6), pp.693~704 (2012)
  26. Black, S., "The Well-Rounded Student", American School Board Journal, 189(6), pp.33~35 (2002)
  27. Bordogna, J., "Engineering education : Innovation through integration", Journal of engineering education, 82(1), pp.3~8 (1993)
  28. Chee, K. H., "Gender Differences in the Academic Ethic and Academic Achievement", College Student Journal, 39(3), pp.604~618 (2005)
  29. Eccles, J. S., "Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band what kind of extracurricular involvement matters?", Journal of adolescent research, 14(1), pp.10~43 (1999)
  30. Etter, D. E., "Engineering Education for the 21st Century", Proceedings. of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp.33~36 (1994)
  31. Godbey, K. L., "Stress-Management Program : Intervention in Nursing Student Performance Anxiety", Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 8(3), pp.190~ (1994)
  32. Huang, Y. -R., "Academic and cocurricular involvement: Their relationship and the best combinations for student growth", Journal of College Student Development, 45(4), pp.391~406 (2004)
  33. Kedrowicz, A., "Infusing Technical Communication and Teamwork within the ECE Curriculum", Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 14(1), pp.41~53 (2006)
  34. Kuh, G. D., "In their own words : What students learn outside the classroom", American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), pp.277~304 (1993)
  35. Student Learning Outside the Classroom: Transcending Artificial Boundaries, "Kuh, G. D.", ~, pp.ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8 (1994)
  36. Lunenburg, F. C., "Extracurricular activities", Schooling, 1(1), pp.1~4 (2010)
  37. Lunenburg, F. C., "Educational administration: Concepts and practices" (2011), Cengage Learning
  38. MacKinnon-Slaney, F., "Theory to Practice in Co-curricular Activities: A New Model for Student Involvement", College Student Affairs Journal, 12(2), pp.35~40 (1993)
  39. Marsh, H. W., "Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goals?", Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), pp.553~ (1992)
  40. Massoni, E., "Positive effects of extra curricular activities on students", ESSAI, 9(1), pp.84~87 (2011)
  41. OECD(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), "The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary", OECD, ~ (2005)
  42. Pascarella, E. T., "How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research" (2005), Jossey-Bass
  43. Prahalad, C. K., "The core competence of the corporation", pp.41~59 (1999), Knowledge and strategy
  44. Ragheb, M. G., "Campus recreation and perceived academic stress", Journal of College Student Development, 34(1), pp.5~10 (1993)
  45. Schneider, B., "Strategies for success : High school and beyond", Brookings papers on education policy, 6, pp.55~93 (2003)
  46. Terenzini, P. T., "Students' out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development : A literature review", Journal of college student development, 40(5), pp.610~623 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

공학계열 학생 핵심역량 진단도구 개발 및 타당화 연구김윤영, 윤지영한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2021 · 제24권 제4호공학계열 대학생의 핵심역량 진단(K-CESA) 결과에 따른 차이분석: 계열, 인증여부, 성별, 입학전형을 중심으로송오성, 신동주, 황지원한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2019 · 제22권 제4호공학계열 대학생들의 교과목 성적과 K-CESA 핵심역량의 관계 분석김학진, 송오성, 황지원한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2016 · 제19권 제4호공과대학 학생들이 갖추어야 할 실행능력에 대한 공학교수자들의 인식 및 교수활동 실태이현주, 장지영한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2016 · 제19권 제4호비교과프로그램이 대학핵심역량에 미치는 영향 ― K 대학교를 중심으로박창남, 정원희한국교양교육학회 · 교양교육연구2017 · 제11권 제1호공과대학생의 핵심역량 검사도구 개발 및 타당화권재기, 정미경한국교육방법학회 · 교육방법연구2014 · 제26권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

연계적 공학해석 교육을 위한 워크플로우 기반 시뮬레이션 환경개발 및 활용 고찰채희승, 김한기, 신정훈, 이종숙, 전인호pp. 3-12공과대학 신입생의 자기효능감, 공학흥미, 사회적지지, 대학생활적응 및 학업지속의향 간의 관계이명화, 이정민pp. 13-24융ㆍ복합 교육과정 개발에 대한 탐색적 연구: 건국대학교 힐링바이오공유대학 중심으로송덕근, 이진홍, 권혁pp. 25-34아이디어박스를 활용한 기술인문융합형 캡스톤디자인 모형개발경종수, 최창하pp. 35-43특허 출원서를 활용한 공학 계열 기술적 글쓰기 수업 사례이성학, 전은경pp. 44-53
원문 보기