공과대학 학생들이 갖추어야 할 실행능력에 대한 공학교수자들의 인식 및 교수활동 실태
Engineering Professors’ Perceptions on the Key Competencies of Engineering Students and Their Instructional Practice
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to investigate engineering professors’ perceptions on the key competencies for engineering students (i.e. creativity, problem solving, designing, field application, etc.) and their instructional efforts to promote the competencies. The guiding research questions included 1) to what extent engineering professors perceived the key competencies as the important qualification that engineering students should obtain in college, 2) to what extent the professors put in a great deal of effort to promote such competencies in their teaching, and 3) how their perceptions on the key competencies correlated with their instructional practice. Two hundred fifteen engineering professors affiliated to diverse fields voluntarily participated in the study and filled out 5 point-Likert scale survey items. In results, despite of some range of variation on their perceptions according to the fields, most of the engineering professors highly valued the four key competencies. However, compared to the perceptions, engineering professors in some engineering fields relatively less focused on promoting the competencies in their teaching practice.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate engineering professors’ perceptions on the key competencies for engineering students (i.e. creativity, problem solving, designing, field application, etc.) and their instructional efforts to promote the competencies. The guiding research questions included 1) to what extent engineering professors perceived the key competencies as the important qualification that engineering students should obtain in college, 2) to what extent the professors put in a great deal of effort to promote such competencies in their teaching, and 3) how their perceptions on the key competencies correlated with their instructional practice. Two hundred fifteen engineering professors affiliated to diverse fields voluntarily participated in the study and filled out 5 point-Likert scale survey items. In results, despite of some range of variation on their perceptions according to the fields, most of the engineering professors highly valued the four key competencies. However, compared to the perceptions, engineering professors in some engineering fields relatively less focused on promoting the competencies in their teaching practice.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강소연, "공학교육인증제도 효과 분석 연구", 공학교육연구, 18(3), pp.59~68 (2015), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 강소연, "공학계열 졸업생의 직무역량에 관한 인식 연구", 공학교육연구, 19(2), pp.102~111 (2016), 한국공학교육학회
- 곽진숙, "공학교육프로그램 인증기준 비교 연구: 초기 Washington Accord 가입국을 중심으로", 교육평가연구, 22(4), pp.1101~1132 (2009), 한국교육평가학회
- 권성호, "해외 공학교육 사례분석을 통한 교수학습 전략 탐색", 공학교육연구, 11(3), pp.12~23 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
- 권오양, "한국공학교육인증원의 성장 2004-2009", 공학교육, 16(3), pp.20~29 (2009)
- 기정훈, "구조방정식을 통한 공학교육인증제도의 성과 분석:공학교육인증 프로그램 졸업생들의 인식조사를 중심으로", 한국정책연구, 11(3), pp.29~45 (2011), 경인행정학회
- 김대영, "공학전문가가 인식하는 공학기초능력의 구성요소에 관한 연구", 공학교육연구, 9(2), pp.34~51 (2006)
- 김윤일, "공학교육 패러다임의 변화와 융복합형 공학설계 프로그램의 역할", 산업기술논문집, 32, pp.157~167 (2015)
- 김진수, "공과대학 교수들의 공학교육 연수실태와 교육요구 분석", 공학교육연구, 11(2), pp.50~64 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
- 국가기술자격제도와 공학교육인증제도 연계 방안 연구, "민동균", 노동부, ~ (2007)
- 박권생, "대학의 교수-학습, 어떻게 정의돼야 하나?", 교육학논총, 32(1), pp.41~53 (2011)
- 인증실효성 확보방안 연구, "송성진", 한국공학교육인증원, ~ (2011)
- 이경희, "공과대학 신입생의 핵심역량 인식수준을 통한 공학교육방향 연구", 공학교육연구, 13(6), pp.57~71 (2010), 한국공학교육학회
- 이현영, "공과대학 교수역량(Teaching Competency) 진단도구 개발연구", 교육공학연구, 28(3), pp.439~469 (2012), 한국교육공학회
- 권성연, "전문대학의 교수ㆍ학습 방법 우수사례 분석 및 시사점", 직업교육연구, 26(1), pp.139~158 (2007), 한국직업교육학회
- 정영학, "지금 공학도에게 필요한 것", 공학교육, 22(3), pp.6~9 (2015)
- 차성운, "설계기술역량 3요수 기반의 공학설계 교육", 공학교육연구, 10(4), pp.5~16 (2007), 한국공학교육학회
- 허돈, "공학교육인증의 학습성과 평가체계의 사례 연구", 공학교육연구, 12(1), pp.57~63 (2009), 한국공학교육학회
- , 1997
- Martilla, J. A., "Importanceperformance analysis", Journal of Marketing, 41(1), pp.77~79 (1977)
- VanTassel-Baska, J., "The William and Mary classroom observation scales revised" (2003), The College of William and Mary