본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공과대학생의 ‘말하기 능력’에 대한 인식과 평가

Engineering Students' Perception of Speaking Ability and Their Communicative Competence Assessment

황순희
한국공학교육학회 (Korean Society for Engineering Education)|2019.05|공학교육연구 (Journal of Engineering Education Research)|제22권 제3호|pp. 18-31|DOI 10.18108/jeer.2019.22.3.18

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

PerceptionAssessmentCommunicative competenceSpeaking abilityEngineering studentsExtra-curricular activities & programs
주제분류학제간연구

초록

In addition to technical skills and competencies, communication competence has been identified to be important to engineering studentswho will be drivers of innovation in a rapidly changing society. Drawing on the previous studies, this research examines the resultsof an empirical exploration of engineering students’ perception of speaking ability and their communicative competence. To date, therehas been most of the research conducted on ‘writing’ (e.g., its educational process, class designs, ability, etc.) for engineering students. However, relatively little attention has been paid to engineering students’ speaking ability perception and their competence diagnosis. This study relies on quantitative data obtained from one survey questionnaire and one test conducted respectively. The sample consistsof 386 engineering students as well as 481 non-engineering students for the 1st survey. And to measure communicative competence,150 engineering students as well as 136 non-engineering students participated in the test. Our findings show that firstly, there weresignificant differences in perception of speaking ability by majors and gender. Whereas there was no difference in the same surveyby grade. Secondly, there was a close and significant relationship between sub-factors of speaking ability. Thirdly, there were significantdifferences in communicative competence by majors. Whereas there was no difference by gender and grade. Fourthly, there was a closeand significant relationship between sub-factors of communicative competence. These findings are expected to provide an explanationfor the improvement on engineering students' speaking ability and to encourage the participation in extra-curricular activities and programsin engineering school.

Abstract

In addition to technical skills and competencies, communication competence has been identified to be important to engineering studentswho will be drivers of innovation in a rapidly changing society. Drawing on the previous studies, this research examines the resultsof an empirical exploration of engineering students’ perception of speaking ability and their communicative competence. To date, therehas been most of the research conducted on ‘writing’ (e.g., its educational process, class designs, ability, etc.) for engineering students. However, relatively little attention has been paid to engineering students’ speaking ability perception and their competence diagnosis. This study relies on quantitative data obtained from one survey questionnaire and one test conducted respectively. The sample consistsof 386 engineering students as well as 481 non-engineering students for the 1st survey. And to measure communicative competence,150 engineering students as well as 136 non-engineering students participated in the test. Our findings show that firstly, there weresignificant differences in perception of speaking ability by majors and gender. Whereas there was no difference in the same surveyby grade. Secondly, there was a close and significant relationship between sub-factors of speaking ability. Thirdly, there were significantdifferences in communicative competence by majors. Whereas there was no difference by gender and grade. Fourthly, there was a closeand significant relationship between sub-factors of communicative competence. These findings are expected to provide an explanationfor the improvement on engineering students' speaking ability and to encourage the participation in extra-curricular activities and programsin engineering school.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 김소희, "대학교육에서 온라인학습의 활용 동향과 교수 . 학습적 함의", 평생학습사회, 14(4), pp.51~78 (2018), 미래원격교육연구원[DOI]
  2. 김안나, "대학생들의 핵심능력 개발에 영향을 미치는개인 및 환경 요인 분석", 한국교육, 30(1), pp.367~392 (2003), 한국교육개발원
  3. 김옥분, "학습동아리 교수․학습 방법 적용에 따른 대학생의 문제해결 능력과 의사소통능력 차이 분석", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 8(11), pp.799~807 (2018), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]
  4. 김은주, "협동학습에서 의사소통 불안 수준이 학업성취도와 수업만족도에 미치는 영향", 교육심리연구, 17(2) (2003), 한국교육심리학회
  5. 김지심, "공과대학생의 학습양식에 따른 의사소통 불안인식 분석 연구", 공학교육연구, 13(6), pp.3~13 (2010), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  6. 김현우, "대학생 핵심역량 제고를 위한비교과 교육프로그램 사례", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(2), pp.337~357 (2018), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  7. 안선경, "개인의 성격과 의사소통 능력 간의 관계", 한국언론학보, 48(2), pp.321~345 (2004), 한국언론학회
  8. 유현숙, "대학생의 의사소통능력 및 종합적 사고력에 영향을 주는 학습과정 요인 분석", 교육행정학연구, 29(4), pp.319~337 (2011), 한국교육행정학회
  9. 이효영, "스피치 능력에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 탐색적 연구 : 초등학생 대상 스피치 교육자 심층 인터뷰를 중심으로", 석사, 언론매체, pp.2011
  10. 장선영, "프로젝트 중심학습에서 학습자의 의사소통능력, 리더십, 비판적 사고력, 정보활용능력이 반성적 사고에 미치는 영향", 교육방법연구, 26(3), pp.391~407 (2014), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
  11. 전영미, "공과대학생들의 학습 과정 분석에 기초한 학습지원 방안 연구 : 수도권 S대 사례를 중심으로", 공학교육연구, 18(1), pp.61~73 (2015), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  12. 진미석, "대학생 핵심역량 진단체제 구축 방안 연구", 교육행정학연구, 29(4), pp.461~486 (2011), 한국교육행정학회
  13. 최정윤, "대학생의 학습성과에 대한 영향 요인 탐색: 대학의 효과 분석을 중심으로", 교육행정학연구, 27(1), pp.199~222 (2009), 한국교육행정학회
  14. 한상우, "대학생의 의사소통역량이 정보활용능력에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국문헌정보학회지, 50(1), pp.377~394 (2016), 한국문헌정보학회[DOI]
  15. 함승연, "공대 졸업생들의 공학기초능력 수준과 교육 요구 분석", 대한공업교육학회지, 34(1), pp.196~209 (2009), 대한공업교육학회
  16. 허경호, "포괄적 대인 의사소통 능력 척도개발 및 타당성 검증", 한국언론학보, 47(6), pp.380~408 (2003), 한국언론학회
  17. 황순희, "공학인의 스피치 불안과 상관요소 분석- 인구사회학적 변인, 자기효능감, 스피치 능력을 중심으로 -", 수사학, (17), pp.199~223 (2012), 한국수사학회
  18. 황순희, "대학생의 리더십, 의사소통 불안, 의사소통 성향의 관계 연구 —성, 전공, 학년 변인을 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, (48), pp.345~380 (2013), 국어교육학회[DOI]
  19. 황순희, "공과대학생의 팀워크 역량과 사고양식의 관계", 공학교육연구, 20(2), pp.39~49 (2017), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  20. 황순희, "공과대학생의 핵심역량 분석과 비교과 활동의 활용", 공학교육연구, 21(6), pp.63~73 (2018), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  21. 황순희, "공과대학생의 의사소통능력과 사고양식의 관계", 교양교육연구, 10(3), pp.515~548 (2016), 한국교양교육학회
  22. 황순희, "‘동아리’ 참가 대학생의 메타인지와 진로적응성 탐색", 교양교육연구, 13(1), pp.293~320 (2019), 한국교양교육학회
  23. Bartkus, K.R., "Clarifying the meaning of extracurricular activity: A literature review of definitions", American Journal of Business Education, 5(6), pp.693~704 (2012)
  24. Binkely, M., "Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills", pp.17~66 (2012), Springer
  25. Clark, G., "‘It’s everything else you do…’: Alumni views on extracurricular activities and employability", Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(2), pp.133~147 (2015)
  26. Dalrymple, O., "The role of extracurricular activities in the education of engineers", International Conference on Engineering Education, pp.24~30 (2006)
  27. de Freitas, C.C.S., "Inclusion of extracurricular activities and student competitions in the curriculum structure for engineering education: Experience based on the Brazilian reality", 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp.793~800 (2013)
  28. Eccles, J.S., "Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band what kind of extracurricular involvement matters?", Journal of adolescent research, 14(1), pp.10~43 (1999)
  29. Furrer, C., "Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance", Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), pp.148~162 (2003)
  30. Hoegl, M., "Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence", Organization Science, 12(4), pp.435~499 (2001)
  31. Student Learning Outside the Classroom: Transcending Artificial Boundaries, "Kuh, G.D.", ~, pp.ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8 (1994)
  32. Lee, W., "Communication apprehension in undergraduate engineering students: The influence of the performing arts and related activities", Proceedings 2007 ASEE Conference, pp.1~10 (2007), ASEE
  33. Lew, M., "Components of cooperative learning: Effects of collaborative skills and academic group contingencies on academic achievement and mainstreaming", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(2), pp.229~239 (1986)
  34. Lunenburg, F.C., "Extracurricular activities", Schooling, 1(1), pp.1~4 (2010)
  35. Lunenburg, F.C., "Educational administration: Concepts and practices" (2011), Cengage Learning
  36. Mann, L.M.W., "The Development of a Tailored Systems Engineering Process for Extracurricular Student Design Projects", DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, pp.645~646 (2003)
  37. McCroskey, J.C., "An introduction to rhetorical communication" (1993), Prentice Hall
  38. Marsh, H.W., "Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goals?", Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), pp.553~ (1992)
  39. Prahalad, C.K., "Knowledge and strategy", pp.41~59 (1999)
  40. Prahalad, C.K., "Strategische unternehmungsplanung—strategische unternehmungsführung", pp.275~292 (2006), Springer
  41. P'Rayan, A., "Developing engineering students' communication skills by reducing their communication apprehension", English for Specific Purposes World, 4(20), pp.1~24 (2008)
  42. Reevy, G.M., "Identifying Collaboration, Teamwork, and Leadership Practices on Campus", Currents in Teaching & Learning, 6(1) (2013)
  43. Richmond, V.P., "Communication: apprehension, avoidance and effectiveness" (1985), Gorsuch Scarisbrick
  44. Rugarcia, A., "The Future of Engineering Education I. A Vision for a New Century", Chem. Engr. Education, 34(1), pp.16~25 (2000)
  45. Wentzel, "Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment", Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, pp.195~203 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

공학커뮤니케이션 수업이 공과대학 학생의 자아효능감 및 의사소통역량에 미치는 영향한지영한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2024 · 제27권 제6호공학커뮤니케이션 교과목 운영을 통한 의사소통 역량의 향상도 분석공명숙, 한지영한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2021 · 제24권 제2호공학인의 스피치 운영 능력과 상관요소 분석- 인구사회학적 변인, 의사소통 성향, 공학 자기효능감을중심으로 -황순희한국수사학회 · 수사학2013 · 제18호공과대학생의 일상적 창의성과 보편적 의사소통능력의 상관관계 탐색윤경미, 황순희한국교양교육학회 · 교양교육연구2015 · 제9권 제3호공학인 대상 ≪공적 말하기≫ 교육의 만족도와 학습자 요구 분석 사례 연구황순희한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2012 · 제15권 제3호공학인 대상 「아카데미 토론」 강의내용 개발과 교육적 효과 분석황순희한국수사학회 · 수사학2012 · 제16호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

공학역량에 대한 산업체의 요구분석이정은pp. 3-104차 산업혁명에 따른 교육 변화에 대한 교원의 인식 분석김영민, 이영주pp. 11-17공과대학생의 팀워크역량이 문제해결능력에 미치는 영향: 창의적 인성의 매개효과노수림, 배성아, 옥승용pp. 32-40대학 교양수학에서 수업시간대와 학업성취도의 관계 연구문은호, 김동호, 심호진, 김재덕, 나광수pp. 41-48공과대학생의 질문태도에 따른 학습자 질문 활성화 전략에 대한 인식 비교성지훈, 정영숙pp. 49-58
원문 보기