공과대학생의 인지적·정의적 학습양식 특성 분석
Analysis on the Characteristics of Cognitive & Affective Learning Style of Engineering University Students
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the traits on the cognitive and affective learning style of university students. CALSIU(TheCognitive & Affective Learning Style Inventory for University School Students) by Kim, E. J. was modified for applying to universitystudents and performed with 399 university students from three universities in Daejeon and Chungnam. Statistical analysis done in thisstudy were ANOVA and Scheffe’s test. Findings of the study are as follows : First, the students with high academic achievementshave intuitive perception type, whole processing type, and deep storage & recall type. Secondly, the students with low academic achievementhave strong non-academic learning type. Third, interaction attitude of affective learning styles is the important element to determinetheir academic achievement. The students with independent type get high academic achievements. Therefore, instructor should considerthe learning styles of students, and it should be used to improve their teaching & learning strategy for better academic achievementsof university students.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the traits on the cognitive and affective learning style of university students. CALSIU(TheCognitive & Affective Learning Style Inventory for University School Students) by Kim, E. J. was modified for applying to universitystudents and performed with 399 university students from three universities in Daejeon and Chungnam. Statistical analysis done in thisstudy were ANOVA and Scheffe’s test. Findings of the study are as follows : First, the students with high academic achievementshave intuitive perception type, whole processing type, and deep storage & recall type. Secondly, the students with low academic achievementhave strong non-academic learning type. Third, interaction attitude of affective learning styles is the important element to determinetheir academic achievement. The students with independent type get high academic achievements. Therefore, instructor should considerthe learning styles of students, and it should be used to improve their teaching & learning strategy for better academic achievementsof university students.
참고문헌 (46)
- 김미라, "의과대학생의 학습양식의 특성과 학업성취와의 관계", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 18(2), pp.133~140 (2006), 한국의학교육학회
- 김상현, "Kolb 학습양식 검사지를 이용한 의과대학생의 학습양식분석", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 19(3), pp.197~205 (2007), 한국의학교육학회
- 김은정, "학습양식의 유형 및 구성요소와 교육과정과의 관계에 대한 연구", 박사, 교육학, pp.2000
- 김은정, "학습유형과 학습양식의 체계적 분류를 통한 개념적 모형 정립", 교육학연구, 40(4), pp.6~133 (2002), 한국교육학회
- 김은정, "초등학생용 인지적ㆍ정의적 학습양식 검사도구의 개발 및 타당화", 초등교육연구, 21(2), pp.259~279 (2008), 한국초등교육학회
- 김정하, "초등학교 4, 5, 6학년 학생의 수학 학습 양식과 유형 분석", 수학교육, 50(3), pp.369~384 (2011), 한국수학교육학회
- 김판수, "초등학교 수학 및 과학 영재와 일반아동의 학습양식과 성격유형의 차이 연구", 학교수학, 5(2), pp.3~208 (2003), 대한수학교육학회
- 문경자, "학습자의 학습양식 유형 분류와 지리교육에서의 시사점", 한국지리환경교육학회지, 17(1), pp.1~15 (2009), 한국지리환경교육학회
- 박은숙, "블랜디드러닝 학습모형 개발 : R2D2와 학습양식 중심으로", 교육정보미디어연구, 14(4), pp.85~110 (2008), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- 백희수, "수학학습양식 구성요인 탐색과 수학학습자 유형 분류 연구", 박사, 수학교육학, pp.2009
- 백희수, "중학생의 수학학습양식 선호유형의 범주화와 학습 특성 비교", 학교수학, 15(1), pp.15~35 (2013), 대한수학교육학회
- 안서원, "의예과 학생들의 인지양식과 학습양식의 관계", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(1), pp.7~13 (2010), 한국의학교육학회
- 안정호, "공대생들의 협동학습에서 학습양식유형 및 셀프리더십과 팀 수행", 공학교육연구, 14(3), pp.9~14 (2011), 한국공학교육학회
- 안정호, "공대생들의 협동학습에서 성격특성 및 창의적 문제해결스타일과 팀 창의성", 공학교육연구, 15(6), pp.43~48 (2012), 한국공학교육학회
- 여상희, "일개 의과대학 의학과 학생의 학습양식", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 18(1), pp.31~40 (2006), 한국의학교육학회
- 이우경, "초등학생의 학습양식 유형과 자기조절 학습능력의 관계", 교사교육연구, 53(1), pp.193~203 (2014), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 유경애, "대학생의 학습양식 차이를 고려한 교양교육의 필요성 연구", 교양교육연구, 7(3), pp.139~170 (2013), 한국교양교육학회
- 이태종, "학습양식에 입각한 교수-학습방법", 창의력개발연구, 7, pp.89~105 (2004)
- 이혜원, "대학생용 정의적․사회적 학습양식 진단도구 개발 및 타당화", 아시아교육연구, 14(3), pp.209~229 (2013), 교육연구소
- 임창재, "학습양식" (1994), 형설출판사
- Biggs, J. B., "Individual and group differences in study processes", British Journal of Psychology, 48, pp.266~279 (1978)
- Biggs, J., "Enhancing learning a matter of style of approach? Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles" (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
- Biggs, J. B, "The process of learning" (1993), Prentice Hall
- Dunn, R., "Learning styles inventory" (1984), Price Systems
- Dunn R., "Understanding the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model and the need for individual diagnosis and prescription", Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6, pp.223~247 (1990)
- Entwistle, N. J., "Learning strategies and learning styles" (1988), Plenum Press
- Felder, R. M, "Learning and teaching styles in Engeneering Education", Engeneering Education, 78(7), pp.674~681 (1988)
- Felder, R. M, "Authors preface:Learning and teaching styles in Engineering Education", Eneneering Education, 78(7), pp.681~ (2002)
- Felder, R. M, "Understanding Student Differences", Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), pp.57~72 (2005)
- "Index of Learning Styles" (1994)[URL]
- Felder, R. M, "Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles", International Journal of Engeneering Education, 21(1), pp.103~112 (2005)
- Goodwin, D. D., "Effects of matching student and instructor learning style preferences on academic achievement in English", Doctor, pp.1995
- The purpose and significance of the NASSP learning style profile, "Keefe, J. W.", ~, pp.ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 283 828 (1987)
- Kolb, D., "Experiential learning : experience as the source of learning and development" (1984), Prentice Hall
- Kolb, D., "Learning Style Inventory, LSI-Ⅱa" (1993), McBer & Company
- Kolb, D., "The Kolb Learning Style Inventory, Version 3" (1999), Hay Group
- Marton, F., "On qualitative differences in learning: Ⅰ- Outcome and process", British Journal of Educational Research, 46, pp.4~11 (1976)
- Marton, F., "On qualitative differences in learning Ⅱ- Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task", British Journal of Educational Research, 46, pp.115~127 (1976)
- Left Mode Techniques, "The 4MAT System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right", pp.1981, McCarthy, B.
- Pask, G., "Styles and strategies of learning", British Journal of Psychology, 46, pp.128~148 (1976)
- Pask, "Learning strategies and individual competence", International Journal of Man-Machine studies, 4, pp.217~253 (1972)
- Plovnick, M., "Primary care career choices and medical student learning styles", Journal of Medical Education, 50, pp.849~855 (1975)
- Reading-Brown, M., "Learning style - liberal arts and technical training: What's the difference?", Psychological Reports, 64, pp.507~518 (1989)
- Richardson, J. T. E., "Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education: a literature survey", Higher Education, 27, pp.449~468 (1994)
- Riechmann, S. W., "A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument", Journal of Psychology, 87, pp.213~223 (1974)
- Kolb's learning style inventory: Review and further study of validity and reliability, "Willcoxson, L.", Reporting results of research undertaken at Monash, University Melbourne, Australia, ~ (1995)