본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공과대학생의 팀워크 역량과 사고양식의 관계

Relationships between Teamwork Skills and Thinking Styles in Engineering Students

황순희
한국공학교육학회 (Korean Society for Engineering Education)|2017.03|공학교육연구 (Journal of Engineering Education Research)|제20권 제2호|pp. 39-49|DOI 10.18108/jeer.2017.20.2.39

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Engineering StudentsThinking StylesTeamwork SkillsTeam Activity CompetenceHierarchical Style
주제분류학제간연구

초록

This research aims to explore the relationships between ‘teamwork skills’ (often called team activity competence) and ‘thinking styles’ of engineering students in Korea, and to provide an explanation for the application of team-based environment as well as for the increase of teamwork skills. Teams and team activity are pervasive in today’s organization and there has been relatively much research on teamwork skills and its related factors. However, to date, little attention has been paid to the teamwork skills, essential factor in team-based environment and its relationships with thinking styles. This study was conducted with 383 engineering students at P University, and students’ teamwork skills as well as thinking styles have been measured before and after team-based learning class (hereafter TBL). Our findings show that firstly, there was a significant increase of teamwork skills between before and after TBL class. Second, team activity competence was found to have a higher correlation with most of creativity generating styles (i.e. legislative, judicial, hierarchical and global styles). Third, hierarchical style was found to influence team activity more than other components, and also legislative, external, global and judicial styles contributed to team-based activity. These findings are expected to provide an explanation for the application of thinking styles in team-based environment and will be useful for the improvement of related courses in engineering school.

Abstract

This research aims to explore the relationships between ‘teamwork skills’ (often called team activity competence) and ‘thinking styles’ of engineering students in Korea, and to provide an explanation for the application of team-based environment as well as for the increase of teamwork skills. Teams and team activity are pervasive in today’s organization and there has been relatively much research on teamwork skills and its related factors. However, to date, little attention has been paid to the teamwork skills, essential factor in team-based environment and its relationships with thinking styles. This study was conducted with 383 engineering students at P University, and students’ teamwork skills as well as thinking styles have been measured before and after team-based learning class (hereafter TBL). Our findings show that firstly, there was a significant increase of teamwork skills between before and after TBL class. Second, team activity competence was found to have a higher correlation with most of creativity generating styles (i.e. legislative, judicial, hierarchical and global styles). Third, hierarchical style was found to influence team activity more than other components, and also legislative, external, global and judicial styles contributed to team-based activity. These findings are expected to provide an explanation for the application of thinking styles in team-based environment and will be useful for the improvement of related courses in engineering school.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 강승희, "공학 전공 대학생의 창의성에 나타나는 성차", 한국기계가공학회지, 14(5), pp.50~59 (2015), 한국기계가공학회[DOI]
  2. 정은실, "팀 구성 방식에 따른 학습활동 만족도: 질적 자료 분석에 의한 사례연구", 교육방법연구, 22(3), pp.67~95 (2010), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
  3. 김미종, "간호사의 임상경력과 조직 내 의사소통이 팀워크 역량에 미치는 영향", 디지털융복합연구, 14(2), pp.333~344 (2016), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  4. 김민웅, "창의적 공학 설계 활동에서 팀 규모에 따른 팀 상호작용 분석", 공학교육연구, 19(4), pp.14~23 (2016), 한국공학교육학회
  5. 노혜란, "대학생 학습공동체에서 구성원의 사고양식에 따른 만족도, 협력적 자기조절, 집단응집성 분석", 교육방법연구, 28(3), pp.539~560 (2016), 한국교육방법학회
  6. 안정호, "종합설계과목의 협동학습에서 셀프 리더십과 팀웍간의 관계", 공학교육연구, 11(4), pp.109~114 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
  7. 유정아, "학습자의 학습양식에 따른 선호 교수유형 분석", 한국교원교육연구, 28(2), pp.51~72 (2011), 한국교원교육학회
  8. 윤경미, "대학생의 리더십 특성에 관한 연구 - 성, 학년, 사고양식을 중심으로", 청소년학연구, 15(7), pp.319~345 (2008), 한국청소년학회
  9. 尹美善, "사고양식과 학업성취에 관한 연구 : Sternberg의 정신자치제이론을 중심으로", 석사, 교육학, pp.1998
  10. 윤미선, "사고양식, 성취목표지향성, 성취도, 연령, 성별 특성이 교과흥미에 미치는 영향- 중고생의 과학교과를 대상으로 -", 교육심리연구, 21(3), pp.557~572 (2007), 한국교육심리학회
  11. 윤미선, "중·고생의 학업성취 결정요인으로서 사고양식, 학습동기, 교과흥미, 학습전략간의 관계모형", 교육심리연구, 18(2), pp.161~180 (2004), 한국교육심리학회
  12. 이은경, "토의를 강조한 소집단 활동이 과학고 학생의 탐구 과정에 미치는 영향과 학습양식․사고양식 간의 관계에 대한 사례 연구", 영재와 영재교육, 12(2), pp.115~140 (2013), 한국영재교육학회
  13. 이은철, "대학 학습동아리 활동 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색을 통한 지원 전략 개발 연구", 열린교육연구, 21(4), pp.351~374 (2013), 한국열린교육학회
  14. 이정규, "사고양식과 학업성취간의 관계구조에서 특목고와 일반고의 차이", 교육방법연구, 17(1), pp.1~17 (2005), 한국교육방법학회
  15. 정정호, "창의적 디자인융합인재의 사고양식 유형", 디자인학연구, 27(2), pp.215~229 (2014), 한국디자인학회[DOI]
  16. 한기순, "과학영재와 일반학생들 간의 사고 양식과 지능 및 창의성간의 관계 비교", 교육심리연구, 18(2), pp.49~68 (2004), 한국교육심리학회
  17. 한지영, "공학계열 학생들의 팀웍 스킬과 성격 5요인과의 관계 연구", 공학교육연구, 18(2), pp.43~51 (2015), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
  18. 황순희, "‌팀 기반 스피치 수업의 교육적 효과 분석 ― 창의성 함양을 위한 교육 사례를 중심으로", 교양교육연구, 8(3), pp.287~322 (2014), 한국교양교육학회
  19. 황순희, "공과대학생의 의사소통능력과 사고양식의 관계", 교양교육연구, 10(3), pp.515~548 (2016), 한국교양교육학회
  20. Cheung, C., "Creativity of university students : What is the impact of field and year study?", Journal of creative behavior, 37(1), pp.42~63 (2003)
  21. Cohen, S. G., "What makes teams work : Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite", Journal of management, 23(3), pp.239~290 (1997)
  22. Dai, D. Y., "A validation study of the thinking styles inventory : Implications for gifted education", Roeper Review, 21(4), pp.302~307 (1999)
  23. Hatcher, L., "From individual incentives to an organization‐wide gainsharing plan : Effects on teamwork and product quality", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(3), pp.169~183 (1991)
  24. Jacobson, C. M., "Cognitive styles of creativity:Relations of scores on the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among managers in the USA", Psychological Reports, 72, pp.1131~1138 (1993)
  25. Johnson, D. W., "Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom" (1998), Interaction Book Company
  26. Kim, J, "The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(1), pp.60~74 (1995)
  27. Knight, D. W., "Staying in engineering: Impact of a hands-on, team-based, first-year projects course on student retention", Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition (2003)
  28. "Evaluating Team Work on Student Projects: The Use of Behaviorally Anchored Scales To Evaluate Student Performance" (1998)[URL]
  29. Liu, X., "The effects of cognitive thinking styles, trust, conflict management on online students' learning and virtual team performance", British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), pp.829~846 (2008)
  30. Michaelsen, L. K., "A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making", Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), pp.834~ (1989)
  31. Michaelsen, L. K., "Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups" (2002), Greenwood publishing group
  32. O’Shei, T., "Engineers are Taught How to be True Team Players", Business First, 14(41), pp.31~33 (1998)
  33. Pun, K. F., "Teaching new product development in universities : an action learning approach", European journal of engineering education, 28(3), pp.339~352 (2003)
  34. Resta, P, "Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning", Educational Psychology Review, 19, pp.65~83 (2007)
  35. Sadler-Smith, E., "Cognitive style and instructional preferences", Instructional science, 27(5), pp.355~371 (1999)
  36. Salas, E., "Is there a"Big Five"in teamwork?", Small group research, 36(5), pp.555~599 (2005)
  37. Salas, E., "On teams, teamwork, and team performance : Discoveries and developments", Human Factors : The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), pp.540~547 (2008)
  38. Smith, K. A., "Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty", pp.71~ (1996), Jossey-Bass
  39. Sternberg, R. J., "Mental self-government : A theory of intellectual styles and their development", Human development, 31(4), pp.197~224 (1988)
  40. Sternberg, R. J., "Allowing for thinking styles", Educational leadership, 52(3), pp.36~40 (1994)
  41. Sternberg, R. J., "Thinking styles" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  42. Sternberg, R.J, "MSG thinking styles inventory: Manual", Star Mountain Projects, ~ (1991)
  43. Stevens, M. J., "Staffing work teams : Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings", Journal of Management, 25(2), pp.207~228 (1999)
  44. Valenti, M., "Teaching tomorrow's engineers", Mechanical Engineering, 118(7), pp.64~69 (1996)
  45. Workman, M., "The effects of cognitive style and media richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), pp.199~219 (2003)
  46. Zhang, Li-Fang, "Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government", The Journal of Psychology, 133(2), pp.165~181 (1999)
  47. Zhang, Li-fang, "Thinking styles and personality types revisited", Personality and individual Differences, 31(6), pp.883~894 (2000)
  48. Zhang, Li-fang, "Thinking styles and the five factor model of personality", European Journal of Personality, 15(6), pp.465~476 (2001)
  49. Zhu, Ch, "Thinking styles and conceptions of creativity among university students", Educational Psychology, 31(3), pp.361~375 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

공과대학생의 일상적 창의성이 팀워크 역량에 미치는 영향윤경미, 황순희한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2020 · 제23권 제5호공과대학생의 팀워크역량이 문제해결능력에 미치는 영향: 창의적 인성의 매개효과노수림, 배성아, 옥승용한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2019 · 제22권 제3호공학계열 학생들의 팀웍 스킬과 성격 5요인과의 관계 연구방재현, 한지영한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2015 · 제18권 제2호공과대학생의 사고양식 탐색윤경미, 황순희한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2017 · 제20권 제5호공학계열 학생들의 팀웍 스킬 구성요소 개발방재현, 한지영한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2011 · 제14권 제5호학년 간 비교를 통한 공대생의 팀 활동에 관한 인식 분석이성룡한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2016 · 제19권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

공학계열 교직전공 예비교사의 STEAM교육 이해도 및 인식현황현은령pp. 3-8호주의 공학기사 양성과정(전문학사, 고급 디플로마)의 성격과 운영 비교신동은pp. 9-18An Integrative Literature Review on Gender in Engineering Education허세진, 한경숙, 신준영, 전광일pp. 19-304개 전공/학습내용별 교수법에 따른 학습반응 분석이재경, 안준수pp. 31-38기계공학수학의 현황 분석을 통한 개편안 제시박찬일, 강주석pp. 50-56
원문 보기