반환 미군기지의 환경오염 문제에 관한 법적 고찰 - 한ㆍ미 SOFA 환경 규정의 문제점과 개선방안중심 -
Study on environmental pollution in returned American military bases regarding its legal aspects - centered on finding and settling the problems of SOFA environmental provision established between Korea and America -
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A total of 23 U.S. military bases in South Korean cities including Maehyangri, a bomb practicing area, came into the hands of Koreans in 2007 by the American troops with no environmental inspection and purification conducted in 2007. In fact, the amendment of SOFA agreement in 2001 stipulated that American troops should return their bases to Korea after ridding them of environmental pollution, if needed. The US military, however, ignored the Korean provision stipulating the environmental purification and took "return of land" procedure based on SOFA's article 4, " no duty of restoring to the original state" As a result, environmental and citizens' groups demand a retraction of environmentally uninspected and unpurified return of American military bases and that has become Korea's current issue. Therefore, it is urgent to revise and add to the environment-related articles in SOFA in order to solve their controversial interpretation between Korea and the U.S. There is no way to arbitrate and settle if both countries have different views in interpreting and conducting SOFA agreements due to unclear and unspecified articles. In conclusion, diplomatic efforts between the two countries are urgently required both strategically and legally.
Abstract
A total of 23 U.S. military bases in South Korean cities including Maehyangri, a bomb practicing area, came into the hands of Koreans in 2007 by the American troops with no environmental inspection and purification conducted in 2007. In fact, the amendment of SOFA agreement in 2001 stipulated that American troops should return their bases to Korea after ridding them of environmental pollution, if needed. The US military, however, ignored the Korean provision stipulating the environmental purification and took "return of land" procedure based on SOFA's article 4, " no duty of restoring to the original state" As a result, environmental and citizens' groups demand a retraction of environmentally uninspected and unpurified return of American military bases and that has become Korea's current issue. Therefore, it is urgent to revise and add to the environment-related articles in SOFA in order to solve their controversial interpretation between Korea and the U.S. There is no way to arbitrate and settle if both countries have different views in interpreting and conducting SOFA agreements due to unclear and unspecified articles. In conclusion, diplomatic efforts between the two countries are urgently required both strategically and legally.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김형태, "미국민사소송에서의 집중심리제도, 재판자료 65집 353면", ~ (1994)
- 김홍균, "미국 종합환경대응책임법(CERCLA)상의 책임당사자와 토양환경보전법상의 오염원인자", 환경법연구, 24(1) (2002), 한국환경법학회
- 남화선, "군부대가 무서운 민통선 사람들", 함께 사는 길 (2002)
- 문진미, "주한미군,왜 이러나", 함께 사는 길 (2001)
- 박항주, "미군의 매향리 폭격을 지원하는 국방부", 함께 사는 길 (2000)
- 박현철, "미군 사격장 아래 파주 취숙장", 함께 사는 길 (2000)
- 성낙진, "쓰레기로 오염되고 있는 분단의 현장", 환경운동 (1994)
- 손기웅, "환경안보라는 군의 새로운 과제. 한국환경보고서 2000" (2005), 녹색연합
- 여영학, "주한미군의 환경파괴와 SOFA", 함께 사는 길 (2000)
- 오두희, "아직 끝나지 않은 SOFA개정 운동" (2001), 깊은 자유
- 이상백, "폭격은 이제 그만", 함께 사는 길 (2001)
- 이시재, "매향리를 반패권주의 블록의 전초기지로", 함께 사는 길 (2000)
- 이재욱, "미군기지의 환경문제", 공군법률논집, 5 (2001)
- 이장희, "평화통일을 위한 한미군사관계의 국제법적 조명-한미행협개정을 촉구하면서", ~ (1999)
- 이장희, "한-미 주둔군지위협정 연구" (2000), 아시아사회과학연구원
- 이현철, "미군 프롬알데히드 한강 방류사건", 함께 사는 길 (2000)
- 채영근, "오염원인자부담원칙의 적용상의 어려움-CERCLA상의 정화책임을 중심으로-", 환경법연구, 23(2) (2001)
- 최승한, "주한미군기지와 환경오염 : 미국 정부의 국가책임과 피해자의 법적 구제, 끝나지 않은 아픔의 역사-미군범죄" (1999), 개마서원
- 홍성태, "군사공간의 생태적 재생과 문화정치 - 용산 미군기지의 경우", 공간과사회, (14) (2000)
- 홍성태, "미국은 왜 전쟁을 필요로 하는가", 황해문화, (봄) (2002)
- 홍성태, "전쟁국가 미국과 정보전쟁", 2002년 제주인권학술회의 발표논문 (2002), 제주인권학술회
- 황숙희, "한반도의 미군기지", 함께 사는 길 (2001)
- 황희연, "국토의 난개발연풍, 그 실태와 대책", 환경과생명, (가을) (2000)
- Jonathan Harr, "A Civil Action" (1995), Random House
- Jerome Facher, "The View from the Bottomless Pit : Truth, Myth, and Irony in A Civil Action, 23 Seattle U.L.Rev.243", ~ (1999)
- Kevin E. Mohr, "Legal Ethics and A Civil Action, 23 Seattle U. L. Rev. 283", ~ (1999)
- Jan Schlichtmann, "Law and Environment:Reflections on Woburn", 24 Seton Hall Legis.J.265, ~ (2000)
- Linda Silvermann, "Civil Procedure:Theory and Practice", Aspen, ~ (2001)
- Sandra A. Smith, "Polyfurication and the right to a civil jury trial: Litle Grace in the Woburn Case, 25.B.C, Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 649", ~ (1998)
- West Bar Review, "First Year Key Review Civil Procedure", ~ (1997)
- Kakonen, "Green Security dr Militarized Environment", Dartmouth, ~ (1994)
- Romm, "Defining National Security - the Nonmilitary Aspects, The Council on Foreign Relations, Inc", ~ (1993)