본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

가정용 섬유제품 중 기타 제품류의 폼알데하이드 위해성평가 연구

Formaldehyde Risk Assessment in Other Household Textile Products

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: Appropriateness issues have emerged regarding the non-application of hazardous substance safety standards for items classified as ‘other textile products’. Objectives: Testing for formaldehyde (HCHO) and risk assessment were conducted on ‘other textiles products’ to provide reference data for promoting product safety policies. Methods: Testing was conducted on five items (102 products) classified as ‘other textile products’ according to relevant standards (textile products safety standards), and the risk of each product was assessed using the evaluation methodologies of the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) and European Chemical Agency (ECHA). Results: Out of the 102 products tested, HCHO was detected above the quantification limit in five. Based on these results, the screening risk assessment indicated that three products exceeded the criteria. Upon re- assessing the emission and transfer rates of products exceeding the criteria, it was confirmed that there were no instances of exceeding the criteria. Conclusions: Risk assessment results can be used as supporting data for non-application of hazardous substance standards. However, it is deemed necessary to transition towards a management approach based on risks in order to addressing emerging trends such as convergence/new products.

Abstract

Background: Appropriateness issues have emerged regarding the non-application of hazardous substance safety standards for items classified as ‘other textile products’. Objectives: Testing for formaldehyde (HCHO) and risk assessment were conducted on ‘other textiles products’ to provide reference data for promoting product safety policies. Methods: Testing was conducted on five items (102 products) classified as ‘other textile products’ according to relevant standards (textile products safety standards), and the risk of each product was assessed using the evaluation methodologies of the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) and European Chemical Agency (ECHA). Results: Out of the 102 products tested, HCHO was detected above the quantification limit in five. Based on these results, the screening risk assessment indicated that three products exceeded the criteria. Upon re- assessing the emission and transfer rates of products exceeding the criteria, it was confirmed that there were no instances of exceeding the criteria. Conclusions: Risk assessment results can be used as supporting data for non-application of hazardous substance standards. However, it is deemed necessary to transition towards a management approach based on risks in order to addressing emerging trends such as convergence/new products.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Kim BY, "The status and improvement of product safety management law and institution", J Law Econ Regul, 10(1), pp.61~79 (2017)
  2. Ju MJ, "A study on the regional distribution of enrollment cases who reported humidifier disinfectant-related health effects", J Environ Health Sci, 47(4), pp.303~309 (2021)
  3. Park TH, "Health risk assessment on radon exposure in Korea residential environments: based on the risk assessment model provided by US EPA", pp.2019
  4. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (KATS), "Starbucks, initiates voluntary recall of travel bags", Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, ~ (2022)
  5. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), "Safety guidance on concentrations of particular chemicals in certain consumer goods" (2014), ACCC Publication
  6. Japan Environment Association (JEA), "“Household textile products version 3.5” certification criteria. Eco Mark Product Category No. 104", Japan Environment Association, ~ (2022)
  7. Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS), "Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) version 7.0", Global Standard Gemeinnützige GmbH, ~ (2023)
  8. "Global Standard No. 1 (GS1)"[URL]
  9. Park TH, "A pilot study on the standard classification system for effective operation of the product safety management : for children’s products", J Stand Certif Saf, 13(1), pp.35~50 (2023)
  10. Adamović D, "Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and cancer risk assessment in an anatomy laboratory", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(21), pp.11198~ (2021)
  11. Naya M, "Risk assessment of formaldehyde for the general population in Japan", Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 43(3), pp.232~248 (2005)
  12. Trantallidi M, "EPHECT III : health risk assessment of exposure to household consumer products", Sci Total Environ, 536, pp.903~913 (2015)
  13. "Commission Regulation (EU) …/…of XXX amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers"[URL]
  14. Targeted risk assessment, "European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC)", ECETOC, ~, pp.ECETOC technical report No. 93 (2004)
  15. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), "Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.15: consumer exposure assessment. ECHA-16-G-07-EN", ECHA, ~ (2016)
  16. ConsExpo 4.0: consumer exposure and uptake models program manual, "Delmaar JE", RIVM, ~, pp.RIVM report 320104004 (2005), 2005
  17. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), "Korean exposure factors handbook", NIER, ~ (2019)
  18. Korean Institute of Product Safety(KIPS), "Establishment of risk management and risk assessment methods to assist in developing and revising safety standards for new convergence products", Korea Planning & Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology, ~ (2022)
  19. 2013 National transportation survey and DB construction project: automobile usage survey, "Korea Transport Institute (KOTI)", Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, ~ (2013)
  20. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), "Regulations regarding the subject and methods of safety assessment for household chemical products", NIER, ~ (2021)
  21. "Vehicle size classes used in the fuel economy guide"[URL]
  22. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), "NIOSH skin notation profiles: formaldehyde", formalin. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2011-145, 2011
  23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), "Guidance notes on dermal absorption", OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publication, ~ (2011)
  24. Jung JY, "Health risk assessment by exposure to heavy metals in PM2.5 in Ulsan industrial complex area", J Environ Health Sci, 49(2), pp.108~117 (2023)
  25. "Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) - generic tables"[URL]
  26. "Registration dossier - formaldehyde"[URL]
  27. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), "Guidelines for human exposure assessment", Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. EPA, ~ (2020)
  28. Aldag N, "Release and absorption of formaldehyde by textiles", Cellulose, 24, pp.4509~4518 (2017)
  29. de Groot AC, "Formaldehyde-releasers: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Formaldehyde-releasers in clothes: durable press chemical finishes. Part 1", Contact Dermatitis, 62(5), pp.259~271 (2010)
  30. European survey on the release of formaldehyde from textiles, "Piccinini P", European Communities, ~ (2007)
  31. Guo H, "Evaluation of emissions of total volatile organic compounds from carpets in an environmental chamber", Build Environ, 39(2), pp.179~187 (2004)
  32. Delmaar JE, "First tier modeling of consumer dermal exposure to substances in consumer articles under REACH : a quantitative evaluation of the ECETOC TRA for consumers tool", Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 65(1), pp.79~86 (2013)
  33. Zaleski RT, "An assessment of the ECETOC TRA consumer tool performance as a screening level tool", J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 33(6), pp.980~993 (2023)
  34. Kang SH, "Comparison of exposure estimates using consumer exposure assessment models and the Korean exposure algorithm", J Environ Health Sci, 50(1), pp.43~53 (2024)
  35. Huh KO, "Directions and suggestions for consumer safety policy in living", Korean J Hum Ecol, 19(2), pp.311~323 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)