장소 특정적 예술에 있어서 장소성의 표현방법에 관한 연구- 에치고츠마리 아트 트리엔날레 작품분석을 중심으로 -
A Study on the Expression of Placeness in Site-specific Art.- Focused on the Analysis of Arts in Echigo-tsumari Art Triennale -
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this thesis is to discuss how placeness is engaged in site-specific arts, and conclusion is as following. 1, although works are situated in the same place, each individual artist chooses different themes, and artists generally prefer a singular subject rather than plural subjects. 2, placeness is divided into “Nature,” “Culture,” and “History.” Many artists understand well enough not only the characteristics in-depth but also the characteristics of places. 3, in terms of form and material, artists tend to use various materials for the same place they use for their art. 4, form structure is mainly divided into faceable style, touchable style, and surroundable style while the subject of how to appreciate art is divided into 7 sections. In the subject of how to appreciate artworks, how the viewer “physically experiences” places is more general than just “seeing” the works. 5, how to visualize placeness is mainly divided into “emphasis,” “examination,” and “visibility.” Any form structure can pertain to each expressing method above, but the most suitable expressing method is different for the form structure. 6, when one thinks about the relationship between placeness and expressing method, it is the most widely used to “emphasize” nature even more to understand the invisible “Nature.” “Culture”which is invisible to eyes but can be recognized through objects can be understood by “emphasizing” and “examining.” “History” which can be understood with the biggest difficulty generally takes the method of “visibility.”
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to discuss how placeness is engaged in site-specific arts, and conclusion is as following. 1, although works are situated in the same place, each individual artist chooses different themes, and artists generally prefer a singular subject rather than plural subjects. 2, placeness is divided into “Nature,” “Culture,” and “History.” Many artists understand well enough not only the characteristics in-depth but also the characteristics of places. 3, in terms of form and material, artists tend to use various materials for the same place they use for their art. 4, form structure is mainly divided into faceable style, touchable style, and surroundable style while the subject of how to appreciate art is divided into 7 sections. In the subject of how to appreciate artworks, how the viewer “physically experiences” places is more general than just “seeing” the works. 5, how to visualize placeness is mainly divided into “emphasis,” “examination,” and “visibility.” Any form structure can pertain to each expressing method above, but the most suitable expressing method is different for the form structure. 6, when one thinks about the relationship between placeness and expressing method, it is the most widely used to “emphasize” nature even more to understand the invisible “Nature.” “Culture”which is invisible to eyes but can be recognized through objects can be understood by “emphasizing” and “examining.” “History” which can be understood with the biggest difficulty generally takes the method of “visibility.”
참고문헌 (17)
- 김성수, "한국 현대건축에 나타난 장소성 표현양상에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회학술발표논문집, 22(1) (2002)
- 남정훈, "현대건축에 있어서 장소성 표현의 유형화에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회학술발표논문집, 20(2) (2010)
- 이승헌, "노베르그 슢츠의 `장소성`이론에 대한 비판적 고찰", 건축역사연구, 12(3) (2003)
- 이은기, "장소 특정적 미술과 현대의 전시", 한국문화공간건축학회논문집, (8), pp.112~120 (2002), 한국문화공간건축학회
- 現代企画室, "大地の芸術祭越後妻有アートトリエンナーレ2009公式ガイドブック大地の芸術祭アートをめぐる旅ガイド", 美術手帖 (2009)
- 大地の芸術祭越後妻有アートトリエンナーレ-2009, "北川フラム", 越後妻有里山協働機構, ~ (2010)
- 大地の芸術祭越後妻有アートトリエンナーレ-2006, "北川フラム", 越後妻有里山協働機構, ~ (2007)
- 大地の芸術祭越後妻有アートトリエンナーレ-2003, "北川フラム", 越後妻有里山協働機構, ~ (2004)
- 大地の芸術祭越後妻有アートトリエナーレ-2000, "北川フラム", 越後妻有里山協働機構, ~ (2001)
- 香山壽夫, "建築意匠講義" (1996), 東京大学出版社
- 土居義岳, "建築キーワード" (1999), 住まいの図書館出版局
- 中村雄次郎, "場所" (1989), 弘文堂
- Schulz, C. N., "ゲニウス・ロキ 建築の現象学をめざして" (1994), 住まいの図書館出版局
- Cohen, S., "物理的コンテクスト/文化的コンテクスト" (1981), 彰国社
- 八田典子, "芸術作品の成立と受容における『場』の関与", 島根毛県立大学総合製作学会論議, (8) (2004)
- 塩崎勝之, "現代建築家における〔場所性〕の文脈とその展開", 本建築学会大会学術講演梗概集 (1992)
- 千葉学, "site specificからsite determinedへ" (2010), 新建築
