본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Critical Review on Civic Friendship andthe Liberal Theory of Justice : AnExploration of Self Identity and the Basis of Fair Share

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Within modern liberal political philosophy, discussions on justice have been centered upon an individualism-based distributive justice and the ‘fair share’ due to each person. According to the liberal theory of justice, the individual is an entity of rational reason and moral autonomy and considers the interests of others and of the community from a viewpoint that is focused on one’s own interests. As practical principles of justice, the principle of desert has attempted to separate the individual’s natural and inherent abilities (merit) from the individual’s intentional efforts (desert); while the principle of needs has transmuted into a set of minimum exclusivity rights to protect the individual’s autonomy from serious harm and injury. Procedural justice theorists such as Rawls have attempted to invalidate the merit of the individual in an attempt to establish the identity of individuals whom are independent of the community, in the effort to promote their ideas on how to mitigate the social inequality that results from natural arbitrariness. The requirement to finalize this logical process is astrong moral reason equipped individual with the capacity of rational action. However, paradoxically, the logic of excessive reason has created an individual who isexclusive-rights-empowered but becomes ‘isolated and selfish’. The issues resulting from this situation are, first, the rational individual who is equipped with moral autonomynow becomes hidden behind a system-guaranteed set of exclusive rights; and second, the individual who should have been a rational actor and actively participating in cooperation and reciprocal relationships, does not find it easy to overcome the temptations of becoming a strategically located but passive and selfish actor within the mass market order. The result is that individuals easily relinquish their moral autonomy and exhibit a tendency to focus on personal gain. This has resulted in an increase in the polarization of society, and an increase of conflict between classes; and has engendered a crisis in the common good of the family and the political community. The true ‘good life’ and the ‘well-ordered community’ cannot be obtained by individuals who are only interested in their ‘share’, but requires ‘good citizens’ who are concerned about the happiness of others and of the society. When we are able to understand that the rational and selfish individual is necessarily non-self-sufficient; and acknowledge that there is a need for mutual philia with others, we will then be able to overcome rational reason and embrace civic friendship. The good citizen of a healthy community that is based on civic friendship, is an individual who has assimilated the virtue of justice, and will be able to aid inovercoming the limitations of modern liberalism, assist in the resolution of the pressing societal and individualistic crises and contribute to theestablishment of a ‘well-ordered community’.

Abstract

Within modern liberal political philosophy, discussions on justice have been centered upon an individualism-based distributive justice and the ‘fair share’ due to each person. According to the liberal theory of justice, the individual is an entity of rational reason and moral autonomy and considers the interests of others and of the community from a viewpoint that is focused on one’s own interests. As practical principles of justice, the principle of desert has attempted to separate the individual’s natural and inherent abilities (merit) from the individual’s intentional efforts (desert); while the principle of needs has transmuted into a set of minimum exclusivity rights to protect the individual’s autonomy from serious harm and injury. Procedural justice theorists such as Rawls have attempted to invalidate the merit of the individual in an attempt to establish the identity of individuals whom are independent of the community, in the effort to promote their ideas on how to mitigate the social inequality that results from natural arbitrariness. The requirement to finalize this logical process is astrong moral reason equipped individual with the capacity of rational action. However, paradoxically, the logic of excessive reason has created an individual who isexclusive-rights-empowered but becomes ‘isolated and selfish’. The issues resulting from this situation are, first, the rational individual who is equipped with moral autonomynow becomes hidden behind a system-guaranteed set of exclusive rights; and second, the individual who should have been a rational actor and actively participating in cooperation and reciprocal relationships, does not find it easy to overcome the temptations of becoming a strategically located but passive and selfish actor within the mass market order. The result is that individuals easily relinquish their moral autonomy and exhibit a tendency to focus on personal gain. This has resulted in an increase in the polarization of society, and an increase of conflict between classes; and has engendered a crisis in the common good of the family and the political community. The true ‘good life’ and the ‘well-ordered community’ cannot be obtained by individuals who are only interested in their ‘share’, but requires ‘good citizens’ who are concerned about the happiness of others and of the society. When we are able to understand that the rational and selfish individual is necessarily non-self-sufficient; and acknowledge that there is a need for mutual philia with others, we will then be able to overcome rational reason and embrace civic friendship. The good citizen of a healthy community that is based on civic friendship, is an individual who has assimilated the virtue of justice, and will be able to aid inovercoming the limitations of modern liberalism, assist in the resolution of the pressing societal and individualistic crises and contribute to theestablishment of a ‘well-ordered community’.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics" (2004), The Pennsylvania State University A Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication
  2. Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics" (2008), Ejay Books
  3. Aristotle, "Politics" (1999), Batoche Books
  4. Cicero, Marcus Tullius, "De Legibus" (2007), Hankilsa
  5. Park, Chan-koo, "Ethics by Concept and Subject" (2006), Seokwangsa
  6. Park, Hyo-chong, "State and Authority" (2001), Bakyongsa
  7. Park, Kyu-cheol, "Historical Socrates and the Human Socrates" (2003), Dongkwaseo
  8. Park, Sang-seob, "State and Violence" (2002), Seoul University Press
  9. Plato, "Lysis" (2007), Ejay Books
  10. Plato, "The Republic" (2007), Bakyongsa
  11. Rawls, John, "Theory of Justice" (2003), Ehaksa
  12. Render, Harry, "Understanding Ethical Life" (2006), Human Love
  13. Schmidtz, D, "Elements of Justice" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  14. Smith, N. D., "Plato critical Assessment" (1998), Routeledge
  15. Gerson, L. P., "Aristotle critical Assessment" (1999), Routledge
  16. Adkins, A. W., "'Friendship' and 'Self-Sufficiency' in Homer and Aristotle", Classical Quarterly (1963)
  17. Ahiauzu, N., "Political Obligations and the Duties of Friends", A Journal of Interdisciplinary Normative Studies, 29 (2007), Ludwig von Mises Institute
  18. Annas, J., "Great Political Thinkers Plato. Volume II" (1977), Mind LXXXVI
  19. Bielskis, A., "What can the Philosophes of European Integration learn from Post-Modern Aristotleians", POLIS : The Forum for Political, Social, Legal and Ethical Theory, Spring Seminar (2005), Human Rights & Social Justice Institute
  20. Brand-Ballard, J., "Legal Formalism, Stage-Neutrality, and Comparative Justice", Colloquim at 2005 meeting of American Philosophical Association (2005)
  21. Bryan, Bradley, "Approaching Others : Aristotle on Friendship's Possibility", Political Theory, 37 (2009), Sage Journals
  22. Cam, P., "Vol 4: philosophy, Democracy and Education, publication by APPEND Asia-Pacific Philosophy Education Network for Democracy" (2003), University of New South Wales
  23. Cebi, S. S., "Aristotele's Civic Friendship and Reinvigorating the Notion of Republican Citizenship", 67th Annual Conference (2009), Midwest Political Science Association
  24. Chojnowski, P., "The Virtue of Justice and Its Limitations, Immaculate Conception Academy, U.S.A", Lifeissues.net, 2002
  25. Cooper, J. M., "Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle", pp.212~264 (2010), Cambridge University Press
  26. Dolinko, D., "Some Naive Thoughts About Justice and Mercy", Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 4 (2007)
  27. Goodman, L. E., "Aristotle's Politics Today" (2007), State University of New York Press
  28. Helm, Bennett W, "Love, Friendship and the Self : The Emotional and Interpersonal Grounds of Autonomy" (2007), Oxford University Press
  29. Hurka, T, "Utilitas, Vol. 18 No. 3 International Society for Utilitarian Studies" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  30. The Utility of Affection : Towards a new approach to 'friendship' in ancient Rome, In Actor, Agency, Network, "Koenraad, Verboven, K.", Medieval Friendship Network, ~ (2006)
  31. Lear, G. R., "Review of Lorraine Pangle, Aristotle and the Philosophy of Friendship", Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2003)
  32. Lewis, C. V., "Aristotle's Philia in relation to contemporary theories of human nature", presentation, 62nd Annual Meeting (2004), Midwest Political Science Association
  33. Long, R. T., "The Value of Friendship", Philosophical Investigations, 26(1) (2003), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  34. Ludwig, Paul P., "Classical Friendship and the Postmodern Challenge", paper at annual meeting of American Political Science Association (2006)
  35. Lynch, S., "Vol 4: Philosophy, Democracy and Education, publication by APPEND Asia-Pacific Philosophy Education Network for Democracy" (2003), University of New South Wales
  36. Martin, T. R., "Demos : Classical Athenian Democracy, The Stoa: a consortium for electronic" (2003), the humanities
  37. McWilliams, W. C., "Justice: Ancient and Modern" (2005), Institute for the Study of Civic Values
  38. Mendieta, E., "Templeton Research Lectures 2006-2009 : Trust : Prospects for Science and Religion" (2007), John Templeton Foundation
  39. Moskop, W. W., "Justice as Friendship : An Aristotelian Perspective on Just Caring and Caring Justice in a Global World", “Spatial Justice” International Conference (2008)
  40. Nacol, E. C., "Friendship's Contribution to Politics : The Limits of Justice in Aristotle's Political Thought", paper at Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association (2005)
  41. Pangle, L. S., "Aristotle and the Philosophy of Friendship : Introduction" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  42. Pangle, L.S., "Civic Friendship and Reciprocity in Aristotle's Political Thought", paper at annual meeting of American Political Science Association (2006)
  43. Pangle, L.S., "The Three Kinds of Friendship, in Aristotle and the Philosophy of Friendship", pp.37~56 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  44. Price, A. W., "Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle" (1989), Clarendon Press
  45. Rachlin, H., "Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 25" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  46. Ronald J, "Recovering the Political Aristotle", American Political Science Review, 94(4) (2000)
  47. Schall, J. V., "Justice : The Most Terrible of the Virtues", Journal of Markets & Morality, 7(2) (2004), Acton Institute
  48. Serge-Christophe, K., "Handbook in Economics" (2005), Elsevier Cy
  49. Schwarzenbach, S., "On Civic Friendship", Ethics, 107(1) (1996)
  50. Schwarzenbach, S., "A Global Principle of Fraternity", 9th Congress, Atelier 29 "Friendship in International Relations" (2007), L'Association Francaise de Science Politique
  51. Smith, J. A., "Electronic Classics Series Publication" (2004), Pennsylvania State University
  52. Smith, T. D., "Hobbes On Getting By With Little Help From Friends", 20th Annual Meeting, Eric Voegelin Society Program, Eric Voegelin Institute & 100th Annual Meeting of the APSA, (Panel 3 : The Modern State and Conceptions of Friendship) (2004)
  53. Sulek, M. M., "Aristotle and Civil Society Theory", WIMPS Presentation The Center on Philanthropy (2008), Indiana University-Purdue University
  54. Waggle, J., "Aristotle on Justice : A Defense, Research Notes", Journal of Value Inquiry (2007)
  55. Watt, Allan A., "Returning Friendship to Ethics: a Nietzchean Perspective", An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, 6(1) (2007), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  56. Park, Lim-hee, "A study on Integrated Justice", 박사, Department of National Ethics Education, pp.2010
  57. Park, Lim-hee, "Critical Review on the Requirements and Meaning of ‘Civic Friendship’ for the Political Community", Ethics & Philosophy, 22 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)