Reconsidering Rawls’ Liberalism, and GreeningDemocracy: A Critical Assessment of Liberalism's Ability to Address Climate Crisis
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores the intricate relationship between the climate crisis and classical liberalism, specifically through the lens of John Rawls' political philosophy. In the context of the climate crisis, we assess the applicability of Rawls' principles, with a particular focus on the so-called 'circumstances of justice.' Rawls' philosophy is not without its limitations, primarily due to its normative nature and anthropocentric perspective. Furthermore, the climate crisis doesn't neatly fit into what Rawls defines as 'the circumstances of justice'—the conditions from which principles of justice are derived. To address these challenges, we propose a post-human liberalism, a framework that broadens the concept of 'human' to include all members of the ecosystem. This approach advocates for global democracy and international cooperation, placing a strong emphasis on the fundamental principle of coexistence. In conclusion, this paper underscores the pressing need for posthuman liberalism in the face of the climate crisis. Such a philosophy would redefine the relationship between humans and nature, adopting a holistic ecosystem perspective and promoting the crucial value of coexistence as we strive to address this critical global challenge.
Abstract
This paper explores the intricate relationship between the climate crisis and classical liberalism, specifically through the lens of John Rawls' political philosophy. In the context of the climate crisis, we assess the applicability of Rawls' principles, with a particular focus on the so-called 'circumstances of justice.' Rawls' philosophy is not without its limitations, primarily due to its normative nature and anthropocentric perspective. Furthermore, the climate crisis doesn't neatly fit into what Rawls defines as 'the circumstances of justice'—the conditions from which principles of justice are derived. To address these challenges, we propose a post-human liberalism, a framework that broadens the concept of 'human' to include all members of the ecosystem. This approach advocates for global democracy and international cooperation, placing a strong emphasis on the fundamental principle of coexistence. In conclusion, this paper underscores the pressing need for posthuman liberalism in the face of the climate crisis. Such a philosophy would redefine the relationship between humans and nature, adopting a holistic ecosystem perspective and promoting the crucial value of coexistence as we strive to address this critical global challenge.
참고문헌 (32)
- Andina, Tiziana, "Global Climate Justice: Theory and Practice" (2023), E-International Relations Publishing
- Baldwin, G., "Rawls and Animal Moral Personality", Animals, 13(7), pp.1~12 (2023)
- Berkowitz, P., "John Rawls and the Liberal Faith", The Wilson Quarterly, 26(2), pp.60~69 (2002)
- Brooks, T., "Climate Change Justice", PS : Political Science and Politics, 46, pp.9~12 (2013)
- Brooks, T., "Climate Change Ethics for an Endangered World" (2022), Routledge
- Burchett, K., "Anthropocentrism and Nature. An Attempt at Reconciliation", Teoria, 34(2), pp.119~137 (2014)
- Carter, D. M., "The Demos in Greek Tragedy", The Cambridge Classical Journal, 56, pp.47~94 (2010)
- Choptiany, L., "A Critique of John Rawls’Principles of Justice", Ethics, 83(2), pp.146~150 (1973)
- Clements, P., "Rawlsian Ethics of Climate Change", Critical Criminology, 23(4), pp.461~471 (2015)
- Dedeoğlu, C, "Posthumanism for Sustainability: A Scoping Review", Journal of Posthumanism, 3(1), pp.33~57 (2023)
- Dodson, A., "Justice and the Environment:Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Ferrando, F., "Philosophical Posthumanism" (2019), Bloomsbury Academic
- Gardiner, S. M., "Climate Change and Liberal Priorities" (2013), Routledge
- Hansen, J. E, "Scientific Reticence and Sea Level Rise", Environmental Research Letters, 2(2) (2007)
- Hansen, J, "State of the Wild 2008-2009: A Global Portrait of Wildlife, Wildlands, and Oceans", pp.6~15 (2008), Island Press
- Hume, D., "An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Kempe, F., "The Global Energy Agenda" (2021), Atlantic Council
- Levine, A., "Rawls’ Kantianism", Social Theory and Practice, 3(1), pp.47~63 (1974)
- Lister, A., "Hume and Rawls on the Circumstances and Priority of Justice", History of Political Thought, 26(4), pp.664~695 (2005)
- Manale, P. A., "Environmental justice, climate change, and agriculture", Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 78(2), pp.45A~49A (2023)[DOI]
- Manning, R., "Environmental Ethics and Rawls’Theory of Justice", Environmental Ethics, 3, pp.155~165 (1981)
- Moellendorf, D., "Climate Change Justice", Philosophy Compass, 10(3), pp.173~186 (2015)
- Mylius, B., "Three Types of Anthropocentrism", Environmental Philosophy, 15(2), pp.159~194 (2018)
- Phillips, D., "Posthumanism, Environmental History, and Narratives of Collapse", Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 22(1), pp.63~79 (2015)
- Rawls, J., "Political Liberalism" (1993), Columbia University Press
- Rawls, J., "Political Liberalism" (1996), Columbia University Press
- Rawls, J., "A Theory of Justice : Revised Edition" (1999), Harvard University Press
- Sardo, M. C., "Responsibility for Climate Justice : Political not Moral", European Journal of Political Theory, 22(1), pp.26~50 (2023)
- Sultana, F., "Critical Climate Justice", Geographical Journal, 188(1), pp.118~124 (2022)
- Tebble, A. J., "On the Circumstances of Justice", European Journal of Political Theory, 19(1), pp.3~25 (2020)
- Töns, J., "John Rawls and Environmental Justice : Implementing a Sustainable and Socially Just Future" (2022), Routledge
- Wolf, C., "Intergenerational Justice" (2009), Oxford University Press