Approving Communitarianism in view of Justice Focusing on Walzer’s Complex Equality or Egalitarianism and Moral Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Theories of Justice would be understand as a subject that dealt with liberalist view, based on methodological abstraction. But Michael Walzer tried to approach Justice in view of equality in accordance with shared cultural background of certain community. Methodological abstraction of John Rawls has internal difficulties such that the concept of value or properties which is separated from social context of community, and that the hardship of reflecting democratic ideas of the society’s actual members. Thus, Michael Walzer’s Complex Equality or Egalitarianism focuses on multiple ways of various cultures’ various value system and distributive principle that composes their own society. Based on this, Walzer insists that formulation and creation of values takes priority and controls its distribution. According to Walzer, separated values could exclusively occupied but could not shifted other types of values in the Society of Complex Equality. Spheres of Complex Equality defines the range of sharing social communication or meaning, and its fundamentals are free exchange, desert, and need. This principles would be approved as an exclusive rules of each own, or suggested as the same dominant principles side by side. Complex Equality or Egalitarianism could be a logical basis of critical socialization, for it rejects and criticizes tyranny. It also formulates motivation of moral practice for social participation or interpersonal competence, by defining the Domain of Justice and trying to apply the Principle of Distribution which characterizes Complex Equality or Egalitarianism.
Abstract
Theories of Justice would be understand as a subject that dealt with liberalist view, based on methodological abstraction. But Michael Walzer tried to approach Justice in view of equality in accordance with shared cultural background of certain community. Methodological abstraction of John Rawls has internal difficulties such that the concept of value or properties which is separated from social context of community, and that the hardship of reflecting democratic ideas of the society’s actual members. Thus, Michael Walzer’s Complex Equality or Egalitarianism focuses on multiple ways of various cultures’ various value system and distributive principle that composes their own society. Based on this, Walzer insists that formulation and creation of values takes priority and controls its distribution. According to Walzer, separated values could exclusively occupied but could not shifted other types of values in the Society of Complex Equality. Spheres of Complex Equality defines the range of sharing social communication or meaning, and its fundamentals are free exchange, desert, and need. This principles would be approved as an exclusive rules of each own, or suggested as the same dominant principles side by side. Complex Equality or Egalitarianism could be a logical basis of critical socialization, for it rejects and criticizes tyranny. It also formulates motivation of moral practice for social participation or interpersonal competence, by defining the Domain of Justice and trying to apply the Principle of Distribution which characterizes Complex Equality or Egalitarianism.
참고문헌 (52)
- Hong, Sungwoo, "Liberalism and Communitarianism Ethics" (2005), Seonhak Press
- Kim, Miyoung, "Modern Communitarianism" (2006), Korean Studies Information
- Kymlicka, Will, "Contemporary Political Philosophy" (2006), Dongmyung Press
- Mulhall, Stephen, "Liberals and Communitarians" (2001), Hanwool
- Sandel, Michael, "Liberalism and the Limits of Justic" (2012), Melon Press
- Schumaker, Paul, "From Ideologies to Public Philosophies: An Introduction to Political Theory" (2010), Humanitas
- Walzer, Michael, "Spheres of Justice" (1999), Philosophy & Practice
- Hwang, Kyungsik, "Why Liberalism and Communitarianism? Conflicts and establishment between individual rights and common good", Proceedings of Spring Seminar, Research Society of Philosophy, pp.1~18 (1999)
- Research Society of Philosophy, "Liberalism and Communitarianism", Proceeding of SNU Research Society of Philosophy (1999)
- Walzer, Michael, "Beyond Liberalism: Dasan Memorial Philosophy Lecture 3" (2001), Philosophy & Practice
- Walzer, Michael, "On Toleration: The Castle Lectures in Ethics, Politics, and Economics" (2004), Mitto Press
- Walzer, Michael, "Interpretation and Social Criticism" (2007), Philosophy & Practice
- Walzer, Michael, "Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory" (2009), Motive Book
- Armstrong, Chris, "Complex Eqality: Beyond Eqality and Difference", Feminist Theory, 3, pp.67~82 (2002)
- Arneson, Richard J, "Against ‘Complex Equality’", Public Affairs Quarterly, 4(2), pp.99~110 (1990)
- 변순용, "다문화 사회 및 글로벌 시대에 요구되는 도덕교육의 핵심덕목으로서의 관용에 대한 연구", 도덕윤리과교육, 31(31), pp.133~152 (2010), 한국도덕윤리과교육학회
- Cohen, Joshua, "Review of ‘Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality’ by Michael Walzer", The Journal of Philosophy, pp.457~468 (1986)
- Doppelt, Gerald, "Walzer’s Theory of Morality in International Relations", Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(1), pp.3~26 (1978)
- Gill, Emily R., "Walzer’s Complex Equality: Constraints & The Right to be Wrong", Polity, 20(1), pp.32~56 (1987)
- Green, S. J. D., "Is Equality of Opportunity a False Ideal for Society?", The British Journal of Sociology, 39(1), pp.1~27 (1988)
- 정현철, "왈쩌의 공동체주의적 사회비판의 역동성과 전망", 가톨릭철학, 15(15), pp.185~214 (2010), 한국가톨릭철학회
- Kim, Eunhee, "Comparative analysis on methodology for political philosophy between Rawls and Walzer", Philosophical Forum, 35, pp.271~297 (2007)
- Kim, Hyungryul, "A Study on the possibilities of realizing Distributional Justice in Korean Education Environment: Focusing on Rawls and Walzer", Outstanding Termpapers, 6, pp.39~64 (2008)
- Kim, Minhyuk, "Study on M. Walzers democratic engagement of political philosophy: theory and cases of Walzers social criticism", 석사, pp.2011
- Kim, Yangja, "Suggestions of Walzer's Complex Equality to Korea Education", Research on Social Studies Education, 10, pp.65~87 (2001)
- Lee, Sangho, "M. Walzer's Theory of Complex Equality and Public Administration", 석사, pp.2010
- Lee, Sunghan, "A Study on M. Walzer’s Complex Equality", 석사, pp.2000
- 임의영, "사회적 형평성의 정의론적 논거모색:R. Dworkin의 ‘자원평등론’을 중심으로", 행정논총, 45(3), pp.1~22 (2007), 한국행정연구소
- 임의영, "사회적 형평성의 정의론적 논거 모색: M. Walzer의 ‘다원주의적 정의론’을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 43(2), pp.1~18 (2009), 한국행정학회
- Mayer, Robert, "Michael Walzer, Industrial Democracy, and Complex Equality", Political Theory, 29(2), pp.237~261 (2001)
- 문성훈, "타자에 대한 책임, 관용, 환대 그리고 인정 - 레비나스, 왈쩌, 데리다, 호네트를 중심으로", 사회와 철학, (21), pp.391~418 (2011), 한국사회와철학연구회
- Moon, Sungwon, "The Liberalist View of Justice in the Epoche of Globalization: Liberalism and Justice", Period and Philosophy, 12(2), pp.277~301 (2001)
- Mullenix, Linda S., "The Limits of Complex Equality", Harvard Law Review, 97(7), pp.1801~1811 (1984)
- 남현주, "시민사회와 사회정의의 맥락에서 본 연대성의 위기와 그 극복 - 뒤르깽, 하버마스, 롤즈 그리고 왈쩌의 입장을 중심으로 -", 사회보장연구, 27(4), pp.137~164 (2011), 한국사회보장학회
- Nayak, Pulin B., "On Equality and Distributive Justice", Economic and Political Weekly, 26(11, pp.12) (1991), 583~590
- Oh, Hyunchul, "Walzer's Complex Egalitarianism and Plural Communitarianism", Citizen and World, 6, pp.353~361 (2004)
- Park, Jungsoon, "Michael Walzer’s Communitarianism", Philosophy and Practice, 41, pp.175~198 (1999)
- 박정순, "공동체주의적 사회비판의 가능성", 범한철학, 30(30), pp.211~248 (2003), 범한철학회
- Park, Jungsoon, "The Philosophic Origins of Complex Equality", Researches on Philosophy, 76, pp.93~117 (2007)
- Rosenblum, Nancy L, "Moral Membership in a postliberal State: Reviews on Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. by Michael Walzer", World Politics, 36(4), pp.581~596 (1984)
- Shachar, Ayelet, "Citizenship as Inherited Property", Political Theory, 35(3), pp.253~287 (2007)
- 손철성, "다문화주의와 관련된 몇 가지 쟁점들", 철학연구, 107(2008), pp.1~26 (2008), 대한철학회
- 손철성, "공동체의 성원권과 외국인 노동자의 지위", 윤리교육연구, 29(29), pp.361~380 (2012), 한국윤리교육학회
- Son, Joonjong, "Debates on Distributive Justice for Just Opportunity of Education: Focusing on M.Walzer’s Theory", Sociology of Education, 9(2), pp.121~142 (1999)
- 설한, "마이클 왈쩌(M. Walzer)의 정치철학: 정의(正義)의 영역과 사회비판", 한국정치학회보, 37(3), pp.27~48 (2003), 한국정치학회
- Veen, Robert J. van der, "The Adjudicating Citizen: On Equal Membership in Walzer's Theory of Justice", British Journal of Political Science, 29(2), pp.225~258 (1999)
- Walzer, Michael, "Liberalism and the Art of Separation", Political Theory, 12(3), pp.315~330 (1984)
- Walzer, Michael, "The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism", Political Theory, 18(1), pp.6~23 (1990)
- Walzer, Michael, "Communitarian complementation on Liberalism and Philosophical Guide for Society of Pluralistic Equity", Philosophy & Practice, 45, pp.136~179 (2000)
- Walzer, Michael, "Contemporary Political Theory: A Reader", pp.134~150 (2003), SAGE
- Yi, Kangbin, "A Critical Study on the Conception of Justice in Communitarianism", 석사, pp.2000
- Youn Jinsook, "Michael Walzer's Defense of Pluralistic Justice", Soong Sil Law Review, 17, pp.193~210 (2007)