초등학생의 모델 확정 과정에 대한 특징 분석
Analysis of Elementary School Students’ Characteristic about Model Determiantion Process
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of elementary school students' modeling process and obtain implications for modeling learning in elementary school students. The task is a mystery tube, one of the black box activities. The internal structure of the mystery tube composed by the participants viewed as a model and conducted a study on the modeling process for elementary school students. The ‘model determination process’ was defined as the process of determining whether the model generated by participant is appropriate to explain the phenomenon. 22 6th graders of elementary school were deliberately sampled, and the same task was carried out once to four times per participant. There are a total of five characteristics of the model determination process obtained through data analysis: ‘Determine the model at a superficial level’, ‘Determine the model that generated the mechanism to account for the whole phenomenon’, ‘Determine the model that generated the mechanism to account for the whole phenomenon’, ‘After verifying the mechanism through model externalization, the model is determined’, and ‘After integrating models including different mechanisms, the model is determined’. The conclusion is, first, in order to learn practical modeling by elementary school students, the input of tasks that fit the level of individual learners and proper scaffolding are required. Second, it was determined that elementary school students can also use the model as a cognitive tool.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of elementary school students' modeling process and obtain implications for modeling learning in elementary school students. The task is a mystery tube, one of the black box activities. The internal structure of the mystery tube composed by the participants viewed as a model and conducted a study on the modeling process for elementary school students. The ‘model determination process’ was defined as the process of determining whether the model generated by participant is appropriate to explain the phenomenon. 22 6th graders of elementary school were deliberately sampled, and the same task was carried out once to four times per participant. There are a total of five characteristics of the model determination process obtained through data analysis: ‘Determine the model at a superficial level’, ‘Determine the model that generated the mechanism to account for the whole phenomenon’, ‘Determine the model that generated the mechanism to account for the whole phenomenon’, ‘After verifying the mechanism through model externalization, the model is determined’, and ‘After integrating models including different mechanisms, the model is determined’. The conclusion is, first, in order to learn practical modeling by elementary school students, the input of tasks that fit the level of individual learners and proper scaffolding are required. Second, it was determined that elementary school students can also use the model as a cognitive tool.
참고문헌 (39)
- Berland, L. K., "Epistemologies in practice : Making scientific practices meaningful for students", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, pp.1082~1112 (2016)
- Briggs, M., "A more challenging mystery tube for teaching the nature of science", The Physics Teacher, 57, pp.300~303 (2019)
- Brooks, M., "Drawing, visualisation and young children’s exploration of"big ideas"", International Journal of Science Education, 31, pp.319~341 (2009)
- Buckley, B. C., "Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology", International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp.895~935 (2000)
- Buckley, B. C., "Developing Models in Science Education", pp.119~135 (2000), Springer
- Chittleborough, G. D., "Why models are advantageous to learning science", Educación Química, 20, pp.12~17 (2009)
- Chiu, M. H., "Modeling competence in science education", Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, pp.1~11 (2019)
- Clement, J., "Handbook of Creativity", pp.341~381 (1989), Plenum
- Clement, J., "Model based learning as a key research area for science education", International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp.1041~1053 (2000)
- Constantinou, C. P., "Towards a Competence- Based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education", pp.39~58 (2019), Springer
- Giere, R. N., "Understanding Scientific Reasoning", pp.2006, Thomson
- Gilbert, J. K., "Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education", pp.17~40 (2016), Springer
- 하지희, "모델링 활동에 대한 과학고등학교 학생들의 인식", 영재교육연구, 19(1), pp.187~205 (2009), 한국영재학회
- Hestenes, D., "Modeling methodology for physics teachers", AIP conference proceedings, 399(1), pp.935~958 (1997), American Institute of Physics
- Justi, R. S., "Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers", International Journal of Science Education, 24, pp.369~387 (2002)
- Ke, L., "Towards a Competence-based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education", pp.181~199 (2019), Springer
- Krell, M., "Towards a Competence-based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education", pp.147~160 (2019), Springer
- Krell, M., "Testing models: A key aspect to promote teaching activities related to models and modelling in biology lessons?", Journal of Biological Education, 50, pp.160~173 (2016)
- Krell, M., "Modellkompetenz im biologieunterricht. biologiedidaktische" (2016), Schwerpunkte und Forschungsgegenstände
- Lederman, J., "Demystifying nature of science : Two activities help young children understand nature of science", Science and Children, 52, pp.40~ (2014)
- Lehrer, R., "Towards a Competence-based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education", pp.221~236 (2019), Springer
- 임성은, "명시적-반성적 접근을 활용한 모델링 수업이 초등학생들의 메타모델링 지식에 미치는 영향 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 40(2), pp.127~140 (2020), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Louca, L. Τ., "Towards a Competence-Based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education", pp.237~256 (2019), Springer
- Louca, L. T., "In quest of productive modeling based learning discourse in elementary school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, pp.919~951 (2011)
- Miller, S., "Modeling the nature of science with the mystery tube", The Physics Teacher, 52, pp.548~551 (2014)
- Morgan, M. S., "Models as Mediators" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Namdar, B., "Modeling-oriented assessment in K-12 science education : A synthesis of research from 1980 to 2013 and new directions", International Journal of Science Education, 37, pp.993~1023 (2015)
- National Research Council, "A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas" (2012), National Academies Press
- Nersessian, N., "Teaching Scientific Inquiry", pp.57~79 (2008), Brill
- NGSS Lead States, "Next Generation Science Standards : For States, By States" (2013), The National Academies Press
- "PISA 2024 Strategic Vision and Direction for Science" (2020)[URL]
- 오필석, "과학과 과학 교육에서 사용되는 모델에 관한 예비 초등 교사들의 인식", 초등과학교육, 28(4), pp.450~466 (2009), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Schwarz, C. V., "Is there a connection? The role of meta-modeling knowledge in learning with models", Keeping Learning Complex: The Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (2002)
- Schwarz, C. V., "Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling : Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners", Journal of Research in Science Teaching : The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46, pp.632~654 (2009)
- Upmeier zu Belzen, A., "Towards a Competence-Based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education", pp.3~19 (2019), Springer
- Van Someren, M., "The Think Aloud Method : A Practical Approach to Modelling Cognitive" (1994), AcademicPress
- Windschitl, M., "Beyond the scientific method : Model based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations", Science Education, 92, pp.941~967 (2008)
- 윤혜경, "초등 예비교사의 자기 모델 탐구 과정과 과학적 모델에 대한 이해 변화", 초등과학교육, 30(3), pp.353~366 (2011), 한국초등과학교육학회