교통법규위반과 죄수(罪數) -한국과 일본의 판례를 중심으로-
Violation of traffic law and counting for crime -A study on the korea and japen’s a leading case-
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Counting for crime is a theoretical field of theory of crime dealing with an issue on criteria about counting on numbers of crime. Violations of traffic laws and regulations mostly consist of several overlaid violative actions in traffic accidents, resulting in uncertainty of the number of violations, or crimes. Therefore, administrative agencies consistently tend to deal with traffic violation cases through relatively light punishments to get rid of disputes related. That being said, it is very important to have an in-depth discussion over the matter in the sense that some clear criteria are necessarily clarified with regard to such cases as driving all the way to Busan from Seoul violating the bus-only lane regulation at the risk of penalties and fines, violating speed limits quite a few times while driving to Daejeon from Seoul and driving under the influence against safety. In that sense, this study aims at contributing to the development of traffic culture in Korea by theoretically establishing a standard for the number of violations, or crimes, against traffic laws and regulations which are closely related with our daily lives.
Abstract
Counting for crime is a theoretical field of theory of crime dealing with an issue on criteria about counting on numbers of crime. Violations of traffic laws and regulations mostly consist of several overlaid violative actions in traffic accidents, resulting in uncertainty of the number of violations, or crimes. Therefore, administrative agencies consistently tend to deal with traffic violation cases through relatively light punishments to get rid of disputes related. That being said, it is very important to have an in-depth discussion over the matter in the sense that some clear criteria are necessarily clarified with regard to such cases as driving all the way to Busan from Seoul violating the bus-only lane regulation at the risk of penalties and fines, violating speed limits quite a few times while driving to Daejeon from Seoul and driving under the influence against safety. In that sense, this study aims at contributing to the development of traffic culture in Korea by theoretically establishing a standard for the number of violations, or crimes, against traffic laws and regulations which are closely related with our daily lives.
참고문헌 (45)
- 김남현, "도로교통법상 처벌규정에 관한 약간의 고찰", 법학연구, 12(3), pp.209~256 (2002), 법학연구원
- 김성돈, "형법총론" (2011), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김성돈, "형법상 죄수론의 구조", 형사법연구, (9) (1997), 한국형사법학회
- 김성돈, "죄수결정의 기준", 법학논고, 14 (1998), 경북대학교 법학연구소
- 김용욱, "경합론의 체계적 구조, In ,『현대형사법의 쟁점과 과제』, 동암 이형국교수 화갑논문집" (1998)
- 김성천, "형법총론" (2012), 소진
- 김일수, "형법총론" (2004), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론(제8판)" (2009), 박영사
- 박광민, "연속범이론의 재검토", 형사법연구, (13) (2000), 한국형사법학회
- 배종대, "형법총론" (2013), 홍문사
- 백형구, "형법상의 일죄의 기준과 분류", 월간고시 (1987)
- 법무부 형사법제과, "독일형법", 법무부, ~ (2008)
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2011), 박영사
- 이정원, "형법총론" (2012), 신론사
- 임웅, "형법총론" (2010), 법문사
- 임웅, "죄수론의 기초, In『현대의 형사법론』박양빈교수 화갑기념논문집" (1996)
- 오영근, "형법총론" (2012), 박영사
- 오영근, "죄수론에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 18 (2001), 한양대학교 법학연구소
- 이경렬, "죄수론의 체계구성에 관한 시론", 비교형사법연구, (2) (2000), 한국비교형사법학회, 법문사
- 이경렬, "죄수결정기준과 법조경합의 본질", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회, 법원사
- 이기헌, "경합범과 상상적 경합, In 『형사판례연구』, 제7권" (1999), 한국형사판례연구회,박영사
- 이기헌, "죄수의 결정, In『형사판례연구』, 제8권" (2000), 한국형사판례연구회
- 윤동호, "공소사실의 동일성 판단기준과 죄수 및 경합론의 관계", 박사, 법학, pp.2005
- 이영란, "형법학" (2011), 형설출판사
- 진계호, "형법총론" (2007), 대왕사
- 정성근, "형법총론" (2011), 삼양사
- 정혜욱, "죄수론의 판단구조에 관한 연구", 원광법학, 28(3), pp.83~110 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김재윤, "새로운 형법총론" (2011), 율곡출판사
- 신동운, "형법총론" (2013), 法文社
- 차용석, "범죄의 경합관계에 관한 일고찰", 법학논총, 4 (1984), 한양대학교 법학연구소
- 本庄武, "危險運轉致死傷罪における危險槪念, In 危險運轉致死傷罪 の綜合的硏究" (2007)
- 伊藤榮樹, "注釋 特別刑法" (1982), 立花書房
- 廷山英雄, "刑法判例百選 I" (1984), 有裵各
- 下村久智, "交通事故判例百選" (1975), 有裵各
- Baumann, "Strafrecht AT" (1995)
- Gropp, "Strafrecht AT" (1997)
- Haft, "Strafrecht AT" (1996)
- Heintschel-Heinegg, "Prüfungstraining Strafrecht" (1992), Methodik der Fallbearbeitung
- Jakobs, "Strafrect AT" (1991)
- Jescheck, "Lehrbuch des Strafrechts" (1996)
- Lackner, "Strafgesetzbuch" (1999)
- Maurach, "Strafrecht AT" (1989)
- Rissing van Saan, "Strafgesetzbuch Leipziger Kommentar" (1978)
- Schmidthäuser, "Strafrecht AT" (1984)
- Wessels, "Strafrechts" (1999)