본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전자소송시대의 ADR의 재조명

The study on ADR in the Era of Electronic Filing

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

With the spread of the Internet, government institutions have been able to take care of many of their affairs with the computer instead of the old-fashioned person communication between people. In the middle of the flow of the times, the Ministry of Justice is trying to introduce an electronic filing system for all kinds of filing procedures in order to promote the convenience and efficiency of judiciary proceedings for people by using information and communication technology. This study set out to reilluminate ADR at a time of a huge transformation of filing procedures themselves. ADR is for the resolution of disputes other than lawsuits. However, even if one of the lawsuit parties used ADR, he or she would try to use filing procedures again if they would be favorable to him or her. One of the realistic issues with ADR is whether it can strike harmony with the right of access to the courts according to the Constitution. If ADR is put to the right use and those who use ADR get satisfaction with the system, ADR can achieve the purpose of its existence even if its harmony with the right of access to the courts remains controversial. The study thus intended to investigate what policy directions ADR should take in the era of electronic filing and focus on electronic filing ADR as the title of the paper suggested. The study would examine whether it would be appropriate to apply ADR with electronic means to ADR with a big possibility of settling a dispute through human contacts rather than substantive truth between the parties and lawsuits and review the aspects of ADR required in this era, electronic filing in other countries, and the current operation of ADR as an electronic means.

Abstract

With the spread of the Internet, government institutions have been able to take care of many of their affairs with the computer instead of the old-fashioned person communication between people. In the middle of the flow of the times, the Ministry of Justice is trying to introduce an electronic filing system for all kinds of filing procedures in order to promote the convenience and efficiency of judiciary proceedings for people by using information and communication technology. This study set out to reilluminate ADR at a time of a huge transformation of filing procedures themselves. ADR is for the resolution of disputes other than lawsuits. However, even if one of the lawsuit parties used ADR, he or she would try to use filing procedures again if they would be favorable to him or her. One of the realistic issues with ADR is whether it can strike harmony with the right of access to the courts according to the Constitution. If ADR is put to the right use and those who use ADR get satisfaction with the system, ADR can achieve the purpose of its existence even if its harmony with the right of access to the courts remains controversial. The study thus intended to investigate what policy directions ADR should take in the era of electronic filing and focus on electronic filing ADR as the title of the paper suggested. The study would examine whether it would be appropriate to apply ADR with electronic means to ADR with a big possibility of settling a dispute through human contacts rather than substantive truth between the parties and lawsuits and review the aspects of ADR required in this era, electronic filing in other countries, and the current operation of ADR as an electronic means.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 전자소송의 추진경과 보고서, "법무부 사법정책실", ~ (2009)
  2. 사법정책실, "전자파일링에 관한 외국법령", ~ (2009)
  3. Jeffrey L. Harrison, "법경제학" (2006), 세창출판사
  4. 양천수, "법률구조 서비스의 내용으로서 법률상담 서비스의 조직화 및 활성화 방안 모색: 법이론의 관점에서", 법과사회, (43), pp.191~219 (2012), 법과사회이론학회
  5. 유병현, "민사소송상 전자문서와 증거", 민사소송, 5 (2002), 한국사법행정학회
  6. 유병현, "우리나라 ADR의 발전방향", 안암법학, (22), pp.293~314 (2006)
  7. 우세나, "민사소송절차의 전자소송화에 대한 고찰 - 민사소송 서류의 전자문서화를 중심으로 -", 민사소송, 13(2), pp.100~124 (2009), 한국민사소송법학회
  8. 이부하, "국민참여재판에 대한 법정책적 조명 - 한국의 국민참여재판과 일본의 재판원재판을 비교하며 -", 공법학연구, 12(4), pp.113~135 (2011), 한국비교공법학회
  9. 이상돈, "현행 분쟁해결제도의 문제점과 개선과제 - 언론중재를 예로 본 법철학적 분석 -", 언론중재, 30(1), pp.8~20 (2010)
  10. 이상돈, "법사회학" (2000), 박영사
  11. 이수종, "ADR의 사회통합적 기능 - 헌법상 재판청구권과의 관계를 중심으로 -", 저스티스, 134(3)통권 : 134-3, pp.225~252 (2013), 한국법학원
  12. 정선주, "ADR통일절차법의 제정에 대한 연구", 민사소송, 11(1), pp.284~311 (2007), 한국민사소송법학회
  13. 전자법원과 전자ADR, "정영수", ~, pp.선진상사법률연구」No.34 (2006)
  14. 최옥환, "민간형 조정제도의 최근 발전동향 연구 -IT발전에의 대응을 중심으로", 한국조정학회 제7회 정기학술대회 발표문 (2011)
  15. 함영주, "법원 조정제도의 발전방향에 관한 소고 - 싱가포르 조정센터(SMC)의 사례를참조하여", 한국 조정학회 제3회 정기학술대회 발표문 (2010)
  16. 신속하고 효율적인 대체적 분쟁해결제도의 활성화를 위한 연구, "함영주", 법무부, ~ (2008)
  17. 황진하, "온라인 ADR의 유형과 법률상의 문제점에 관한 연구", 석사, 국제통상물류, pp.2009
  18. 황찬현, "전자문서의 민사증거법상의 문제", 법조, 48(9) (1999)
  19. 박세일, "법경제학" (2009), 박영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)